MARY KATE O'CONNELL, APPELLANT, v. MAX JACOBS, &., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, SETH JACOBS, RESPONDENT

81 N.Y.2d 797, 611 N.E.2d 289, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388 (1993).
February 11, 1993

4 No. 14 [1993 N.Y. Int. 15]
Decided February 11, 1993.

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

Helen Kaney Dempsey, for Appellant.
Neil A. Goldberg, for Respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division (181 AD2d 1064) that the admissible evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Bellacosa and Smith concur.

MARY KATE O'CONNELL, APPELLANT, v. MAX JACOBS, &., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, SETH JACOBS, RESPONDENT

81 N.Y.2d 797, 611 N.E.2d 289, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388 (1993). February 11, 1993

81 N.Y.2d 797, 611 N.E.2d 289, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388 (1993).
February 11, 1993