NY Court of Appeals 
LII
 
 Collection home Search  Tell me more   
LII home 

PEOPLE & C., APPELLANT, v. DONALD CALLENDAR, RESPONDENT.

90 N.Y.2d 831, 683 N.E.2d 332, 660 N.Y.S.2d 710 (1997).
June 10, 1997

2 No. 116 [1997 NY Int. 103]
Decided June 10, 1997

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
Seth M. Lieberman, for appellant.
Andrea G. Hirsch, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The People's sole argument is that a prejudice standard, rather than the per se error rule, should apply to Rosario violations raised by CPL 440.10 motions made before defendant's direct appeal is concluded (see also, People v William Machado, No. 117 [decided today]). Having failed to raise this specific issue before the hearing court, the People have not preserved their claim for our review.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Decided June 10, 1997