NY Court of Appeals 
LII
 
 Collection home Search  Tell me more   
LII home 

T.D., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

91 N.Y.2d 860, 690 N.E.2d 1259, 668 N.Y.S.2d 153 (1997).
December 22, 1997

1 No. 252

 [97 NY Int. 0236]
Decided December 22, 1997 


This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

Ruth Lowenkron, for appellants.
Lucia M. Valente, for respondents.
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, et al.;
Associated Medical Schools of New York; American College of
Neuropsychopharmacology, et al.; American Psychiatric
Association, et al.; and Greater New York Hospital Association,
amici curiae.

 MEMORANDUM:

 

The appeal should be dismissed without costs.

 In bringing this action, plaintiffs sought to have declared invalid regulations promulgated by defendant New York State Office of Mental Health (OMH), pertaining to experimentalmedical research on patients or residents of OMH facilities deemed incapable of giving consent. Plaintiffs have received the complete relief sought in this litigation. A successful party who has obtained the full relief sought is not aggrieved, and therefore has no grounds for appeal (CPLR 5511; Parochial Bus Sys., Inc. v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539, 544 545; Matter of Bayswater Health Related Facility v Karagheuzoff, 37 NY2d 408, 412 413).

 We note moreover that, once the Appellate Division in its decision below had concluded that the challenged regulations were invalid because OMH lacked statutory authority to promulgate them, it was unnecessary under the circumstances here presented to prospectively declare the regulations invalid on additional common law, statutory, and constitutional grounds. In doing so, the Appellate Division issued an inappropriate advisory opinion ( see, Cuomo v Long Is. Lighting Co., 71 NY2d 349; New York Pub. Interest Res. Group v Carey, 42 NY2d 527; Matter of State Indus. Commn., 224 NY 13).

 Since plaintiffs are not aggrieved, and defendants have not cross appealed, the appeal must be dismissed.

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal dismissed, without costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Decided December 22, 1997