Anthony Roberts et al.,
Respondents,
v.
General Electric Company,
Appellant,
et al.,
Defendant,
UE&C Catalytic, a Division of
Raytheon Constructors Inc.,
Third-Party Appellant,
et al.,
Third-Party Defendant.
2002 NY Int. 29
MEMORANDUM:
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action dismissed.
This is an action brought pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1). Plaintiff, an employee of an asbestos removal company,
was injured when a piece of asbestos, which had been cut and
deliberately dropped from a chemical tank approximately 12 feet
above ground, fell on him. Plaintiff and his wife brought this
action against General Electric Company, the owner of the
Here, the asbestos that fell on plaintiff was not a material being hoisted or a load that required securing for the purposes of the undertaking at the time it fell, and thus Labor Law § 240(1) does not apply. * * * * This was not a situation where a hoisting or securing device of the kind enumerated in the statute would have been necessary or even expected (Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., , 96 NY2d 259, 268 [2001]). Accordingly, there was no basis for liability pursuant to Labor Law § 1).