Submitted by Lawrence A. Vogelman, for Appellant.
Submitted by Donna Krone, for Respondent.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. For the reasons stated by the majority at the Appellate Division, we reject defendant's argument that the trial court's inquiry pertaining to his request for new counsel was inadequate. Under the circumstances here, we conclude that no further inquiry was required. Moreover, we find no merit in defendant's contention that his attorney provided inadequate representation. Counsel's decision not to call a witness, whose testimony he assessed as weak, was a strategic legal decision which does not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 150-152). Finally, defendant's arguments concerning the prosecutor's summation are meritless. The statements complained of constituted nothing more than permissible references to the absence of credible testimony supporting defendant's alibi defense (see, People v Allen, 121 AD2d 453, 454, affd 69 NY2d 915).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Bellacosa and Smith concur.