THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. DAVID L. GATEWOOD, APPELLANT.

91 N.Y.2d 905, 691 N.E.2d 1024, 668 N.Y.S.2d 1000 (1998).
February 11, 1998

CoCt No. 1

[98 NY Int. 0004]
Decided February 11, 1998

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of County Court should be affirmed.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the proffered lay testimony of defendant's wife concerning the alleged effects of the drug Prozac upon defendant (see, People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433).

Defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Decided February 11, 1998

THE PEOPLE &C., RESPONDENT, v. DAVID L. GATEWOOD, APPELLANT.

91 N.Y.2d 905, 691 N.E.2d 1024, 668 N.Y.S.2d 1000 (1998). February 11, 1998

91 N.Y.2d 905, 691 N.E.2d 1024, 668 N.Y.S.2d 1000 (1998).
February 11, 1998