Ariz. Admin. Code § R9-17-404.04 - Method Criteria and References for Analyses for Microbial Contaminants
A. To perform
laboratory testing for the microbial contaminants in Table 3.1, a laboratory
shall use an applicable method:
1. Described
in:
a. The Bacteriological Analytical Manual
(BAM), 2019, which is incorporated by reference, includes no future editions or
amendments, and is available at
https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bacteriological-analytical-manual-bam;
or
b. AOAC Official Methods of
Analysis, 21st Edition, 2019, which is incorporated by reference, includes no
future editions or amendments, and is available at
https://www.aoac.org/official-methods-of-analysis-21st-edition-2019;
2. Validated according
to, as applicable:
a. AOAC - Appendix J:
Guidelines for Validation of Microbiological Methods for Food and Environmental
Surfaces, 2012, which is incorporated by reference, includes no future editions
or amendments, and is available at
http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_j.pdf;
b. AOAC - Appendix K: Guidelines for Dietary
Supplements and Botanicals, 2013, which is incorporated by reference, includes
no future editions or amendments, and is available at
http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_k.pdf;
c. ICH - Validation of Analytical Procedures:
Text and Methodology Q2(R1) 2005, which is incorporated by reference, includes
no future editions or amendments, and is available at
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q2_R1__Guide-line.pdf
or
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/q2-r1-validation-analytical-procedures-text-and-methodology;
d. AOAC SMPR® 2019.001 - Standard Method
Performance Requirements (SMPRs®) for Detection of Aspergillus in Can-nabis
and Cannabis Products, which is incorporated by reference, includes no future
editions or amendments, and is available at
https://www.aoac.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/SMPR202019_001.pdf;
or
e. AOAC SMPR® 2020.002 -
Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPRs®) for Detection of
Salmonella species in Cannabis and Cannabis Products, which is incorporated by
reference, includes no future editions or amendments, and is available at
https://www.aoac.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/SMPR-2020_002.pdf;
3. For Escherichia coli testing,
having a limit of quantitation of at least 10 colony forming units per gram;
and
4. If applicable, meeting the
requirements in subsection (I)(2) or (3).
B. A technical laboratory director shall
ensure that all instruments and equipment used for testing medical marijuana or
a marijuana product for microbial contaminants are:
1. Set up, calibrated, and verified according
to:
a. Manufacturer's acceptance criteria;
and
b. Requirements for the
specific method, as specified in subsection (A)(1)(a) or (b), as
applicable;
2. Monitored
and maintained according to AOAC - Guidelines for Laboratories Performing
Microbiological and Chemical Analyses of Food, Dietary Supplements, and
Pharmaceuticals, 6.3: Facilities and Environmental Conditions, 6.4: Equipment,
7.7: Ensuring the Validity of Results, and Appendix A: Equipment, August 2018,
which is incorporated by reference, includes no future editions or amendments,
and is available at
https://www.aoac.org/aoac-accreditation-guidelines-for-laboratories-alacc;
and
3. Applicable for the analytes
to be tested.
C. A
technical laboratory director shall ensure that:
1. The organisms required as controls are
checked, as appropriate for their application:
a. To ensure there is no contamination with
other organisms,
b. For
verification of biochemical or other biological characteristics, and
c. To ascertain the number of organisms;
and
2. Documentation is
maintained of the:
a. Checking required in
subsection (C)(1), and
b.
Traceability of the organisms in subsection (C)(1) from date of
possession.
D.
A technical laboratory director shall ensure that for an initial demonstration
of capability:
1. Before implementing a
method, at least four replicate reference samples for each analyte are:
a. Spiked with control organisms at an amount
allowing for quantitation, and
b.
Taken through the entire sample preparation and analysis process;
2. Whenever a significant change
to instrumentation or to a standard operating procedure occurs, the laboratory
demonstrates, as specified in subsection (D)(1), that acceptable precision and
bias can still be obtained by the changed conditions; and
3. Whenever a new laboratory agent who will
be performing testing on medical marijuana or marijuana products is being
trained, the laboratory agent demonstrates, as specified in subsection (D)(1),
acceptable precision and bias.
E. A technical laboratory director shall
ensure that each batch of media or reagent:
1.
Is examined to ensure it is suitable for use;
2. If externally prepared, has a certificate
of meeting quality control standards, issued by the manufacturer, before the
batch of media or reagent is used;
3. If internally prepared, has documentation
of:
a. Instructions for
preparation;
b. Traceability to
dehydrated media or reagent concentrate;
c. Sterility, including, as applicable:
i. Autoclave records showing the date, run
number, autoclave identifier, nature of the material being autoclaved, time at
desired temperature, and name of the laboratory agent starting the autoclave;
and
ii. For another sterilization
method, records showing the date, type of sterilization method, nature of the
material being sterilized, confirmation of the sterilization as applicable to
the method, and name of the laboratory agent initiating the sterilization
method;
d. Checking for
the following, as applicable, including the name of the laboratory agent who
performed the check and date of the check:
i.
pH,
ii. Appearance,
iii. Fill volumes,
iv. Batch size, and
v. Quantity; and
4. Undergoes quality control
verification, as applicable, including the name of the laboratory agent who
performed the verification and date of verification, for:
a. The ability of media to sustain growth of
the organism for which the media will be used;
b. If applicable, the ability of media to
select for specific organisms or characteristics of an organism;
c. The ability of a reagent to function as
intended; and
d. Sterility of the
media or reagent before use.
F. If test kits or other identification
systems are used for laboratory testing, a technical laboratory director shall
ensure that:
1. Each lot of test kits or
other identification systems undergoes quality control verification before use,
including the name of the laboratory agent who performed the verification and
date of verification, for:
a. Having a
certificate of meeting quality control standards, issued by the manufacturer;
and
b. Passing a visual inspection
of physical characteristics;
2. If an identification system is intended to
speciate organisms, the identification system is tested with at least one
control organism appropriate for the identification system to confirm
acceptability; and
3. For testing
using ELISA:
a. The ELISA testing calibration
curve has at least four standards;
b. The standards in subsection (F)(3)(a)
bracket the maximum allowable contaminants in Table 3.1 for the analyte;
and
c. For linear and non-linear
calibration models, the coefficient of determination
(r2) is greater than or equal to 0.990 with no
rounding.
G. A
technical laboratory director shall ensure that:
1. For testing for
Aspergillus with a plating method:
a. One of the following plating media is
used:
i. Malt extract agar, BAM Media
M182;
ii. Dichloran rose bengal
chloramphenicol agar, BAM Media M183: or
iii. Potato dextrose agar with rose bengal
and chloramphenicol; and
b. PetrifilmTM,
SimplateTM, or another pre-made plate that is
unsuitable for growing spreading molds is not used;
2. For testing for mycotoxins by any method,
at least a 0.5 g sample is tested;
3. For testing for
Aspergillus or Salmonella, the samples are
enriched using a validated AOAC method; and
4. For samples that test "Detected" for
Aspergillus or Salmonella:
a.
A log is maintained identifying the samples, and
b. A sample is only retested when quality
control standards have failed or when recommended by the instrument
manufacturer.
H. A technical laboratory director shall
include in the final report of testing, according to
R9-17-404.06(B)(3)(d)(iii),
the following data qualifier notations if:
1.
The limit of quantitation and the sample results were adjusted to reflect
sample dilution - D1;
2. A
description of the variance is described in the final report of testing
according to
R9-17-404.06(B)(3)(d)(ii)
- N1;
3. Sample integrity was not maintained -
Q1;
4. The sample is heterogeneous,
and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory
practices - Q2; or
5. Testing
result is for informational purposes only and cannot be used to satisfy
dispensary testing requirements in
R9-17-317.01(A) or
labeling requirements in
R9-17-317 - Q3.
I. A technical laboratory director
shall ensure that:
1. The reporting units for
Escherichia coli are colony forming units per gram
(CFU/g);
2. Reporting for
Salmonella is "Detected" or "Not detected" in one
gram;
3. Reporting for
Aspergillus is "Detected" or "Not detected" in one gram;
and
4. Reporting for mycotoxins
includes:
a. Total aflatoxins in units of
micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg), and
b. Ochratoxin A in units of micrograms per
kilogram (µg/kg).
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.