Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 10, § 1620.10 - Dishonest Dealings and Misleading Statements
(a)
The following constitute dishonest dealings by a program administrator under
Financial Code section
22161.
This list is not exhaustive of all activities that constitute dishonest
dealings by a program administrator.
(1)
Disclosing to a PACE solicitor or PACE solicitor agent the amount of PACE
financing available to a property owner.
(2) Paying a PACE solicitor for work that is
financed through an assessment contract that a program administrator knows or
should have known is unperformed. For purposes of this paragraph, a
determination of whether work is performed shall be consistent with Business
and Professions Code section
7159.5,
paragraph (a)(5).
(3) Making the
final payment on an assessment contract to a PACE solicitor when the program
administrator knows or should have known that a product financed through an
assessment contract is uninstalled.
(A) For
purposes of this paragraph, a warranty shall not constitute an uninstalled
product.
(B) For purposes of this
paragraph, contract terms and services including, but not limited to, a
warranty, operations, maintenance, repairs, and customer service shall not
constitute an uninstalled product.
(4) Paying a PACE solicitor for a product
that is materially higher in price from the product the PACE solicitor installs
on the property, where the program administrator knows or should have known
that the product installed costs materially less than the product financed
through the assessment contract.
(b) The following constitute dishonest
dealings and a program administrator shall create and enforce policies and
procedures to prohibit a PACE solicitor and a PACE solicitor agent from doing
any of the following:
(1) Misrepresenting the
manner that a PACE obligation may be repaid.
(2) Representing to a property owner that the
PACE program is a free, no cost, subsidized, or government program, unless the
program has those characteristics.
(3) Representing to a property owner that the
PACE program is available to the property owner based on the property owner's
age, race, ethnicity, or income status, unless the program has that
criteria.
(4) Representing to a
property owner that the property owner is eligible for PACE financing through
the program administrator prior to the program administrator making that
determination.
(5) Representing to
a property owner that a home improvement meets an energy or water efficiency
standard unless the improvement meets such standard, such as the home
improvement being Energy Star rated or included within title 20 or title 24 of
the California Energy Commission's rules.
(6) Representing to a property owner that a
PACE assessment will result in a tax credit or tax benefit unless the
representation is consistent with written representations, statements, or
opinions of the Internal Revenue Service or applicable state tax agency about
the tax treatment of a PACE assessment.
(7) Failing to complete the scope of work
under a home improvement contract that is financed by the assessment
contract.
(8) Representing to a
property owner that a home improvement that is not an efficiency improvement
may be financed through a PACE assessment, or otherwise provided to a property
owner for free or at a nominal cost, because the property owner enters into an
assessment contract.
(9)
Misrepresenting to a property owner whether the property owner will be
obligated to pay for the efficiency improvements financed through the
assessment contract.
(10) Stating
to the property owner that the assessment contract will transfer to the buyer
upon the sale of the property, unless the property owner is also informed at
the same time that often lenders will require the remaining balance under the
assessment contract to be paid before financing or refinancing a
property.
(11) Representing that an
efficiency improvement will result in an increase in a property's market value,
unless evidence supports the representation and the representation is otherwise
lawful.
(12) Misleading the
property owner about the overall cost of the assessments.
(13) Retaliating against a property owner for
canceling the assessment contract during the three-day or five-day right to
cancel period.
(14) Including home
improvements not eligible for PACE financing in an assessment
contract.
(15) Facilitating a
property owner entering into multiple assessment contracts on the same property
for the same efficiency improvement. This paragraph does not prevent a PACE
solicitor or PACE solicitor agent from assisting a property owner with
obtaining financing offers from more than one program administrator, provided
that the property owner only enters into one assessment contract to finance
each efficiency improvement and the program administrator does not provide the
PACE solicitor or PACE solicitor agent information on the amount of financing
for which the property owner is approved. This paragraph does not prevent a
PACE solicitor or PACE solicitor agent from assisting a property owner entering
into an assessment contract through more than one program administrator on the
same property for different efficiency improvements.
(c)
(1)
Nothing in this rule is intended to limit, impede, or interfere with the
Contractors State License Board's jurisdiction over representations made in the
solicitation of home improvement contract, including representations regarding
a tax or utility credit or rebate for an efficiency improvement.
(2) Nothing in this section authorizes any
representation that is restricted or prohibited under any law.
Notes
Note: Authority cited: Section 22150, Financial Code. Reference: Section 7159.5, Business and Professions Code; Section 22161, Financial Code; and Section 5925, Streets and Highways Code.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.