Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 2, § 18225.7 - Made at the Behest; Independent Versus Coordinated Expenditures
(a) Application.
(1) The term "made at the behest" is used in
four contexts in the Act:
(i) for
"contributions" and "expenditures" defined in Sections 82015 and
82025;
(ii) for "independent
expenditures" defined in Sections 82031 and 85500, to differentiate between
expenditures that are made in coordination with a candidate or committee versus
those that are made by a person independent of the candidate or
committee;
(iii) for "behested
payments" reports filed by an elected officer or a Public Utilities
Commissioner who solicits funds for charitable, legislative or governmental
purposes as specified in Section 84224; and
(iv) for communications identifying a state
candidate as specified in Section 85310.
(2) The definition of "made at the behest" in
subdivision (b) and Section 82041.3 applies to all uses of that term in the
Act. The provisions in subdivisions (c)-(g) apply for coordinated
expenditures.
(b) Made at
the Behest. "Made at the behest" of a candidate or committee means made under
the control or at the direction of, in cooperation, consultation, coordination,
or concert with, at the request or suggestion of, or with the express, prior
consent of the candidate or committee. Throughout this regulation, the terms
"candidate" and "committee" include their agents, when the agent is acting
within the scope of the agent's authority.
(c) Independent vs Coordinated Expenditures.
For purposes of Sections 82031, 85500 and 85310, an expenditure is made at the
behest of a candidate or committee, and is not considered independent, if the
expenditure funds a communication that is made under any of the following
circumstances:
(1) General Coordination. The
expenditure is made at the request, suggestion, or direction of, or in
cooperation, arrangement, consultation, concert or coordination with, the
candidate or committee on whose behalf, or for whose benefit the expenditure is
made. To be considered coordinated, such prearrangement must occur prior to the
making of a communication.
(2)
Involvement in Communication. The expenditure funds a communication that is
created, produced or disseminated either:
(A)
After the candidate or committee has made or participated in making any
decision regarding the content, timing, location, mode, intended audience,
volume of distribution, or frequency of placing the communication; or
(B) After discussion between a creator,
producer, or distributor of a communication, or the person paying for that
communication, and the candidate or committee, regarding the content, timing,
location, mode, intended audience, volume of distribution or frequency of
placing that communication.
(d) Expenditures Presumed to be
Coordinated/Made at the Behest. For purposes of subdivision (c) of this
regulation, there is a rebuttable presumption that an expenditure funding a
communication is made at the behest of a candidate or committee and not
independent of the candidate or committee on whose behalf, or for whose
benefit, the expenditure is made, under any of the following circumstances:
(1) Campaign Needs. The expenditure is based
on information about the candidate's or committee's campaign needs or plans
that the candidate or committee provided to the expending person directly or
indirectly, such as information concerning campaign messaging, planned
expenditures or polling data.
(2)
Agent. The expenditure is made by or through any agent of the candidate or
committee in the course of the agent's involvement in the current campaign. For
purposes of this regulation, the "current campaign" means
(i) for a candidate, the period beginning 12
months prior to the date of the primary or special election in which the
candidate is on the ballot for an elective office and ending on the date of the
general or special runoff election for that office; or
(ii) for a measure, 12 months prior to the
date of the election in which the measure is on the ballot.
(3) Common Consultants. The person making the
expenditure for a communication relating to a clearly identified candidate or
ballot measure retains the services of a person who provides either the
candidate or the committee supporting or opposing the ballot measure with
professional services related to campaign or fundraising strategy for the
current campaign.
(4)
Republication. The communication relating to a clearly identified candidate or
ballot measure replicates, reproduces, republishes or disseminates, in whole or
in substantial part, a communication, including video footage, designed,
produced, paid for or distributed by the candidate or committee.
(5) Fundraising. The committee making the
expenditure is primarily formed to support the candidate or oppose their
opponent and in the course of the current campaign, the candidate who benefits
from the expenditure solicits funds for or appears as a speaker at a fundraiser
for the committee making the expenditure, thereby participating in the
committee's fundraising strategy.
(6) Former Staff. The person making the
expenditure is established, run, or staffed in a leadership role, by an
individual who previously worked in a senior position or advisory capacity on
the candidate's or officeholder's staff within the current campaign in which
the expenditure is made.
(7)
Candidate's Family. The person making the expenditure is established, run,
staffed in a leadership role, or principally funded by an individual who is an
immediate family member of the candidate.
(e) Expenditures Not Considered
Coordinated/Made at the Behest. An expenditure is not considered to be
coordinated or made at the behest of a candidate or committee based solely on
any of the following circumstances:
(1)
Interview. A person interviews a candidate on issues affecting the person
making the expenditure.
(2)
Photograph or Press Release. The person making the expenditure has obtained a
photograph, biography, position paper or press release from the candidate or
the candidate's agents.
(3) Prior
Contribution. The person making the expenditure has made a contribution to the
candidate or committee.
(4) General
Request for Support. The person making the expenditure is responding to a
general, non-specific request for support by a candidate or committee, provided
that there is no discussion with the candidate or committee prior to the
expenditure relating to details of the expenditure.
(5) Meeting with Members or Employees. The
person making the expenditures has invited the candidate or committee to make
an appearance before the person's members, employees, shareholders, or the
families thereof, provided that there is no discussion with the candidate or
committee prior to the expenditure relating to details of the
expenditure.
(6) Informed after the
Fact. A person informs a candidate or committee that the person has made an
expenditure, provided that there is no other exchange of information, not
otherwise available to the public, relating to details of the
expenditure.
(7) Expenditure
Benefits Another Candidate or Committee. An expenditure is made at the request
or suggestion of the candidate or committee for the benefit of another
candidate or committee.
(8)
Hyperlink. The communication includes a hyperlink to the Internet website or
other social media page of a candidate or measure
committee.
(f) Certain
Committee Communications. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
regulation, if two or more committees exchange information between or among
themselves, subsequent expenditures by each committee are not, merely by reason
of that exchange, considered to be coordinated with or "made at the behest" of
the other committee(s), where the committees are (i) all general purpose
committees, (ii) all committees primarily formed to support or oppose the same
candidate or candidates, or (iii) all committees primarily formed to support or
oppose the same measure or measures.
(g) Coordinated Expenditures are Treated as
Contributions. An expenditure that is made at the behest of or in coordination
with a candidate or committee, is considered a contribution to the candidate or
committee, unless it is otherwise exempted from the definition of
"contribution" by any provision of the Act or its regulations.
Notes
2. Amendment of section and NOTE filed 4-9-2003; operative 4-9-2003 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4 (Register 2003, No. 15).
3. Amendment of section heading, section and NOTE filed 11-9-2015; operative 12-9-2015, pursuant to Title 2, section 18312(e), of the California Code of Regulations. Submitted to OAL for filing and printing only pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements and not subject to procedural or substantive review by OAL) (Register 2015, No. 46).
4. Amendment of subsections (a)(1)-(2) and NOTE filed 7-22-2019; operative 8-21-2019 pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, section 18312(e). Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements and not subject to procedural or substantive review by OAL) (Register 2019, No. 30).
5. Amendment of subsection (b) filed 5-12-2021; operative 6-11-2021 pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, section 18312(e). Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements and not subject to procedural or substantive review by OAL) (Register 2021, No. 20).
6. Amendment of subsection (a)(2) filed 10-20-2022; operative 11-19-2022 pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., title 2, section 18312(e). Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements and not subject to procedural or substantive review by OAL) (Register 2022, No. 42).
Note: Authority cited: Section 83112, Government Code. Reference: Sections 82015, 82025, 82031, 82041.3, 84224, 85310 and 85500, Government Code.
2. Amendment of section and Note filed 4-9-2003; operative 4-9-2003 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(Register 2003, No. 15).
3. Amendment of section heading, section and Note filed 11-9-2015; operative
4. Amendment of subsections (a)(1)-(2) and Note filed 7-22-2019; operative
5. Amendment of subsection (b) filed 5-12-2021; operative
6. Amendment of subsection (a)(2) filed 10-20-2022; operative
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.