Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 2, § 18361.2 - Memorandum Respecting Civil Litigation
(a) If the Executive Director concludes civil
litigation should be initiated, the Executive Director shall submit to the
Commission a written memorandum, which shall be first reviewed by the General
Counsel, or an attorney from the Legal Division, summarizing the facts and the
applicable law of the case and recommending the initiation of a lawsuit. The
memorandum shall include all exculpatory and mitigating information known to
the staff.
(b) The Commission shall
review the memorandum at an executive session. The General Counsel, or an
attorney from the Legal Division, and the Commission Assistant shall be in
attendance. No other member of the staff may be present unless the Commission
meets with a member of the staff for that person to answer questions. The
Commission may not resume its deliberations until the person is no longer
present. Any communication between the Commission and the person during the
executive session shall be recorded. After review of the memorandum, the
Commission may direct the Executive Director to do any of the following:
(1) Initiate civil litigation.
(2) Decide whether probable cause proceedings
should be commenced pursuant to 2 Cal. Code of Regulations Section
18361.4.
(3) Return the matter to the staff for
further investigation.
(4) Take no
further action on the matter or take any other action it deems
appropriate.
(c) If the
Commission decides to initiate civil litigation, the Commission may then permit
other members of the staff to attend the executive session.
(d) If the Executive Director deems it
necessary, the Executive Director may call a special meeting of the Commission
to review a staff memorandum recommending the initiation of civil
litigation.
(e) It is the intent of
the Commission in adopting this section to preserve for the members of the
Commission the authority to decide whether alleged violations should be
adjudicated in administrative hearings or in civil litigation, while at the
same time avoiding the possibility that discussions with members of the staff
might cause members of the Commission to prejudge a case that might be heard by
the Commission under Government Code Section 83116.
Notes
2. Amendment filed 7-18-2007; operative 8-17-2007. Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements) (Register 2007, No. 29).
3. Amendment of subsections (a) and (d) filed 5-12-2021; operative 6-11-2021 pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, section 18312(e). Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements and not subject to procedural or substantive review by OAL) (Register 2021, No. 20).
Note: Authority cited: Section 83112, Government Code. Reference: Sections 83115, 83115.5 and 83116, Government Code.
2. Amendment filed 7-18-2007; operative 8-17-2007. Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements) (Register 2007, No. 29).
3. Amendment of subsections (a) and (d) filed 5-12-2021; operative
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.