(a) At closure, the owner or operator shall:
(1) remove or decontaminate all waste
residues, contaminated containment system components (liners, etc.),
contaminated subsoils, and structures and equipment contaminated with waste and
leachate, and manage them as hazardous waste unless section
66261.3(d)
applies; or
(2)
(A) eliminate free liquids by removing liquid
wastes or solidifying the remaining wastes and waste residues;
(B) stabilize remaining wastes to a bearing
capacity sufficient to support final cover; and
(C) cover the surface impoundment with a
final cover designed and constructed to:
1.
prevent the downward entry of water into the closed impoundment throughout a
period of at least 100 years;
2.
function with minimum maintenance;
3. promote drainage and minimize erosion or
abrasion of the final cover;
4.
accommodate settling and subsidence so that the cover's integrity is
maintained; and
5. have a
permeability less than or equal to the permeability of any bottom liner system
or natural subsoils present;
6.
accommodate lateral and vertical shear forces generated by the maximum credible
earthquake so that the integrity of the cover is maintained;
7. preclude ponding of rainfall and surface
run-on over the closed area.
(b) If some waste residues, contaminated
materials or contaminated soils are left in place at final closure, the owner
or operator shall comply with all postclosure requirements contained in
sections
66264.117 through
66264.120, including maintenance
and monitoring throughout the postclosure care period (specified in the permit
under section
66264.117). The owner or operator
shall:
(1) close the facility in a manner that
will minimize any chance of postclosure release of hazardous waste or discarded
hazardous material; facilitate postclosure maintenance, monitoring and
emergency response; and require minimum maintenance of containment structures,
leachate collection systems and surface drainage collection or diversion
systems;
(2) maintain the integrity
and effectiveness of the final cover, including making repairs to the cap as
necessary to correct the effects of settling, subsidence, erosion or other
events;
(3) maintain and monitor
the leachate collection and removal system which also serves as a leak
detection system;
(4) maintain and
monitor the groundwater monitoring system and comply with all other applicable
requirements of article 6 of this chapter;
(5) prevent run-on and run-off from eroding
or otherwise damaging the final cover, and
(6) Maintain and monitor the leak detection
system in accordance with sections
66264.221(c)(2)(D) and
(c)(3) and
66264.226(d), and
comply with all other applicable leak detection system requirements of this
chapter;
(c)
(1) If an owner or operator plans to close a
surface impoundment in accordance with subsection (a)(1) of this section, then:
(A) the closure plan for the impoundment
under section
66264.112 shall include both a
plan for complying with subsection (a)(1) of this section and a contingent plan
for complying with subsection (a)(2) of this section in case not all
contaminated subsoils can be practicably removed at closure; and
(B) the owner or operator shall prepare a
contingent postclosure plan under section
66264.118 for complying with
subsection (b) of this section in case not all contaminated subsoils can be
practicably removed at closure.
(2) The cost estimates calculated under
sections
66264.142 and
66264.144 for closure and
postclosure care of an impoundment subject to this paragraph shall include the
cost of complying with the contingent closure plan and the contingent
postclosure plan.
(d)
During the postclosure care period, if liquids leak into a leak detection
system, the owner or operator shall notify the Department of the leak in
writing within seven (7) days after detecting the leak.
(e) If waste is to remain in a unit after
closure, the owner or operator shall comply with, and plan for compliance with
the following:
(1) The unit shall be
compacted before any portion of the final cover is installed.
(2) (reserved).
(3) (reserved).
(4) A foundation layer shall be provided for
the compacted barrier layer of the final cover. If needed, the foundation layer
shall contain herbicide sufficient to prevent vegetative growth, and shall be
free of decomposable organic matter. The layer shall be compacted at a moisture
content sufficient to achieve the density required to provide adequate support
for the nonearthen membrane.
(5) A
compacted barrier layer of clean earth shall be provided above the foundation
layer, and shall be provided around the unit to a depth as low as the level at
which the owner or operator has deposited waste, to prevent lateral migration
of waste and gas and vapor from the waste. The layer of earth shall be wholly
below the average depth of frost penetration, and shall be compacted at a
moisture content sufficient to achieve a percent compaction that has been
demonstrated, with the specific cover material to be used, to prevent the
downward entry of water into the foundation layer for a period of at least 100
years.
(6) The earthen material
shall contain herbicide sufficient to prevent growth of vegetation. The slope
of the final top surface of the compacted barrier layer shall be sloped after
allowance for settling and subsidence to prevent the build up of hydraulic
head.
(7) the owner or operator may
use nonearthen materials for the barrier layer provided it is demonstrated to
the satisfaction of the Department that a barrier layer of alternative
composition will equally impede movement of fluid and be as durable as a
compacted earthen barrier.
(8) If
hazardous waste is underlain by a liner containing a synthetic membrane, then a
synthetic membrane shall be provided in the final cover above the compacted
barrier layer. The membrane shall be made of material chemically resistant to
the waste at the facility, whether or not contact between the membrane and the
waste is anticipated, and shall have thickness and strength sufficient to
withstand the stresses to which it shall be including shear forces, puncture
from rocks or penetration from roots.
(9) If a synthetic membrane is used in the
final cover system, the owner or operator shall provide a layer of material
above the synthetic membrane of the final cover, and a layer of material below
this synthetic membrane, to protect the membrane from damage.
(10) The owner or operator shall provide a
water drainage layer, blanket or channel above the compacted barrier layer of
the final cover to provide a path for water to exit rapidly.
(11) The owner or operator shall provide a
filter layer above the water drainage layer to prevent soils from clogging the
drainage layer.
(12) The owner or
operator shall provide a layer of top soil of thickness sufficient to support
vegetation for erosion controlled deep enough to prevent root penetration into
the filter layer. The top soil shall have characteristics to protect the
compacted layer against drying that would lead to cracking, to resist erosion
and to support vegetation growth.
(13) Permanent disposal areas shall be graded
at closure so that with allowance for settling and subsidence, the slope of the
land surface above all portions of the cover, shall be sufficient to prevent
ponding of water. Such areas shall be graded to drain precipitation away from
the disposal area. Portions of the land surface above the cover unavoidably
slopes great enough to invite erosion which cannot be readily controlled by
vegetation shall be protected by gunite, riprap or other material sufficient to
provide erosion control.
(14)
Unless vegetation on the cover would pose a significant fire hazard
unacceptable to the fire prevention authority or would interfere with a planned
postclosure use of the site that is acceptable to the Department, the owner or
operator shall provide conditions favorable for hearty growth of vegetation
that will provide erosion control without forming roots that would penetrate
the compacted earth cover, and shall estimate the cost of providing such
conditions and vegetation as part of the cost of closure. Vegetation for closed
disposal areas shall be selected to require minimum watering and maintenance.
Plantings shall not impair the integrity of containment structures or the final
cover.
(15) At and after closure,
permanent disposal areas shall have drainage systems capable of transporting
water from the water drainage layer away from the closed facility and capable
of diverting surface runoff away from or around disposal areas, containment
structures, leachate collection systems and monitoring facilities. Drainage
systems shall be capable of preventing erosion of containment structures.
Drainage system components themselves shall be lined or otherwise protected
against erosion.
(16)
(A) When closing a permanent disposal site,
the owner or which the horizontal location and elevation of the cover and other
containment features, monitoring facilities and drainage features can be
determined throughout the entire postclosure care period. All survey work shall
conform to accepted survey practices and be performed and certified by a
licensed land surveyor or registered professional engineer licensed to practice
surveying.
(B) The owner or
operator shall submit a copy of the surveyor's notes used to establish the
benchmarks described in this subsection in accordance with section
66264.116.
(17) The owner or operator shall provide in
the closure plan predictions of the magnitude of the drops in elevation that
will occur at various portions of the top surface of the final cover as a
result of settling and subsidence. The prediction shall account for compression
of material underlying the liner (or underlying the waste if there is no liner)
and compression of the liner, waste, fill and cover. The prediction of the drop
in elevation due to compression shall account for immediate settlement, primary
consolidation, secondary consolidation and creep, liquefaction and dynamic
consolidation due to earthquake loads.
(18) If the following information has not
already been submitted to the Department and if dikes and hazardous waste will
remain at the site after closure, the owner or operator shall provide in the
closure plan proof that the dikes have sufficient structural integrity to
withstand forces to which they can be exposed during and after closure,
including the following:
(A) descriptions of
topography and site conditions as required by section
66270.14(b)(18);
(B) depiction of the design layout, sections
and details of the impoundment and its components, including cover, dike,
liner, drainage and leak detection system;
(C) a description of, and the results of,
stability analyses for the following conditions:
1. foundation soil bearing failure;
2. failure in the dike slopes; and
3. build-up of hydrostatic pressure due to
failure of drainage system and cover, considering the potential for piping and
erosion;
(D) strength and
compressibility test results pertaining to the dike material;
(E) descriptions of dike construction and
postclosure maintenance procedures with schedules and specifications;
(F) descriptions of subsurface soil
conditions, groundwater levels, bedrock conditions and seismic setting of the
site;
(G) discussion of the
occurrence or nonoccurrence of the following factors and the significance of
those factors to the integrity of the dikes:
1. frost, freezing, wind, rain, temperature
variations, effects of vegetation and animals and activities of
humans;
2. adversely oriented
joints, slickensides or fissured material, faults, seams of soft materials and
weak layers;
3. potential for
liquefaction during earthquakes coincident with existence of saturated
conditions due to failure of drainage system and cover;
(H) a certification by a professional
engineer registered in California that the dikes have sufficient structural
integrity to withstand forces to which they can be exposed during and after
closure, based on analyses, tests and inspections that include the following:
1. a review of all the geologic,
geotechnical, geohydrologic and other pertinent design, construction and
service data;
2. a review of all
climatic data, and special geologic events, such as earthquakes, which occurred
during the entire period the impoundment was in service;
3. a field inspection to detect signs of
settlement, subsidence, cracks, scouring, erosion, slides, holes, piping,
seepage, sloughing, condition of vegetation, etc.; and
4. a determination if the original design was
adequate and a review of possible changes in parameters used in the original
design.
(19)
The owner or operator shall include in the closure plan an explanation of how
the cover, construction procedures and planned postclosure care are designed to
accommodate or avoid the effects of differential settlement and consolidation
without loss of integrity of the cover.
(f) Before installing the compacted barrier
layer of the final cover the owner or operator shall accurately establish the
correlation between the desired permeability and the density at which that
permeability is achieved. To accomplish this the owner or operator shall:
(1) provide a representative foundation area
for a test compacted barrier layer having drainage conditions representative of
the closed facility under the compacted barrier layer;
(2) install a compacted barrier layer over
that test area that has the depth and materials of construction that the
compacted barrier layer for the entire landfill is planned to have, and that is
compacted in the manner planned for the compacted barrier layer for the entire
landfill;
(3) undertake
permeability tests in the test area saturated conditions that represent the
maximum hydraulic could be exerted on the compacted barrier layer of the final
cover. A sufficient number of tests shall be run to verify the results. A
permeability test shall commence after the test apparatus has run for a time
long enough to allow the required daily rate of replenishment water to maintain
constant head or to follow an asymptotic or constant trend. The rate of
evaporation from the test equipment used to determine permeability shall be
established;
(4) undertake a
sufficient number of tests in the test area to determine the average density at
which permeability complying with subsection (e)(5) of this section is
obtained.
(g) The owner
or operator shall comply with the following when installing the compacted
barrier layer of the final cover.
(1) In each
day in which final cover material is compacted, the owner or operator shall
establish a grid on the upper surface of each layer compacted that day and
randomly conduct density tests. A sufficient number of tests shall be conducted
to confirm the effectiveness and uniformity of the compaction.
(2) If the Department indicates areas where
compaction tests will be needed, the owner or operator shall undertake such
tests in those areas.
(3) If the
average of the values of compaction from the tests is lower than the average
density pursuant to subsection (f)(4) of this section, the entire layer
installed on the day represented by the tests shall be removed and replaced
with another layer compacted so that compaction tests taken indicate a density
higher than the average density determined pursuant to subsection (f)(4) of
this section.
(4) An independent,
qualified person registered in California as a professional engineer or
certified in California as an engineering geologist shall supervise the
undertaking of all tests for permeability and percent compaction, shall
supervise the construction of the final cover and shall prepare a report to be
submitted to the Department which bears his or her signature and the date of
the signature, and describes the results of all tests and indicates whether or
not the cover, as installed, complies with the requirements of this
chapter.
(5) Before starting
compaction of earthen material to form the compacted barrier layer of the
cover, the owner or operator shall submit to the Department the results of the
following determinations, on material to be used for the compacted barrier
layer of the final cover:
(A) percent
fines;
(B) plastic limit, liquid
limit, plasticity index and shrinkage factors;
(C) soil classification;
(D) carbon content;
(E) concentration of soluble salts in soil
pore water.
(h)
All slopes shall be designed and constructed to minimize the potential for
failure. Any slope failure occurring within the site shall be promptly
stabilized and the Department and the appropriate regional board shall be
notified immediately by the owner or operator of such failure and the methods
taken for stabilization.
(i)
Adequate facilities shall be provided to ensure for a 100 year period that no
leachate shall be discharged to surface waters or groundwater, except as
authorized by the hazardous waste facility permit.
(j) Hazardous waste and discarded hazardous
material contained in the closed facility shall be protected from washout and
erosion as the result of tides or floods having a predicted frequency of once
in 100 years.
(k) An inspection and
monitoring program shall be established at every closed disposal area wherein
an independent, qualified engineer registered in California shall annually
evaluate and document the condition of all surface improvements, drainage
facilities, erosion control facilities, vegetative cover, gas control
facilities and monitoring facilities. This program shall also document the
presence of any water or leachate flowing from the disposal area. The engineer
shall evaluate the following and the effects of the following:
(1) condition of access control (fences and
gates),
(2) condition of
vegetation,
(3) erosion,
(4) cracking,
(5) disturbance by cold weather,
(6) seepage,
(7) slope stability,
(8) subsidence,
(9) settlement,
(10) monitoring the leak detection system, if
there is one,
(11) operation of the
leachate collection and removal system,
(12) monitoring the groundwater monitoring
system,
(13) condition of run-on
and run-off control systems, and
(14) condition of surveyed benchmarks.
The program shall be continued by the owner or operator of
the disposal area throughout the postclosure care period. A copy of the annual
report containing the above-cited observations shall be filed in a timely
manner with the Department and the appropriate regional
board.
(l)
[Reserved]
(m) All constructed
features which will remain at permanent disposal areas containing hazardous
waste material shall be able to withstand the maximum credible earthquake
without significant damage to foundations, structures, waste containment
features and features which control leachate, surface drainage, erosion and
gas.
(n) (Reserved)
(o) If monitoring equipment or other features
which are required to be operable after closure of the facility pursuant to
this chapter are rendered inoperable, the owner or operator shall render it
operable or replace it with operable equipment or other features.
(p) Postclosure care which the owner or
operator shall provide for shall include the conducting of surveys by a
licensed land surveyor, to determine the horizontal location and elevation of
the cover and other containment features, monitoring facilities and drainage
features, and markers installed at the site pursuant to subsection (e)(16) of
this section. Such surveys shall be taken annually.
(q) The owner or operator shall reconstruct
the closed facility to restore slopes and other conditions to conform to the
requirements of this chapter when movement at the site has caused them not to
comply with such requirements.
(r)
The owner or operator shall submit annual reports to the Department describing
measures undertaken at the site during the postclosure maintenance
period.