1 CCR 301-1-7.0 - District and Institute Accountability Processes: Directed Action and Removal of Accreditation
7.1 If a
District or the Institute is Accredited with a Turnaround Plan and the
Department determines that the District or Institute has failed to make
substantial progress under its Turnaround Plan or if the District or Institute
has been on Performance Watch for the full five (5) years, the Commissioner
shall assign the State Review Panel to critically evaluate the District's or
the Institute's performance. The Department shall exclude a District's or the
Institute's Accreditation rating for the 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23 school
years from the calculation of five (5) years. However, if a District or the
Institute submits a request for reconsideration in the fall of 2022 and it is
approved by the Department, the District's or Institute's 2022-23 Accreditation
rating may be factored into the calculation of five (5) years. The State Review
Panel will recommend one or more of the following actions:
(1) If the recommendation applies to a
District:
(A) That the District's
accreditation be removed;
(B) That
the District be reorganized pursuant to Article 30 of this Title 22, which
reorganization may include consolidation;
(C) That a private or public entity, with the
agreement of the District serve as a lead partner in the management of the
District or partially or wholly manage one or more of the District Public
Schools. The Local Board and the Department shall ensure that the private or
public entity uses research-based strategies and has a proven record of success
working with school districts and schools under similar
circumstances;
(D) That one or more
of the District Public Schools be converted to a charter school;
(E) That one or more of the District Public
Schools be granted status as an innovation school pursuant to section
22-32.5-104, C.R.S., or that the
Local Board recognize a group of District Public Schools as an innovation
school zone pursuant to section
22-32.5-104, C.R.S.; or
(F) That one or more of the District Public
Schools be closed.
(2) If
the recommendation applies to the Institute:
(A) That the Institute's Accreditation be
removed;
(B) That the Institute
board be abolished and that the governor appoint a new Institute board pursuant
to section
22-30.5-505, C.R.S.;
(C) That a public or private entity take over
management of the Institute or management of one or more of the Institute
Charter Schools; or
(D) That one or
more of the Institute Charter Schools be closed.
7.2 After critically evaluating the
District's or Institute's performance, the State Review Panel shall submit a
written recommendation to the Commissioner. The Department shall forward the
written recommendation to the State Board Office, the applicable Local Board or
Institute board, and District or Institute staff.
7.3 Following the release of the Department's
initial Accreditation ratings that place a District or the Institute in the
fifth year of Performance Watch, the Department shall provide a copy of a
written recommendation from the Commissioner to the State Board Office
concerning one or more of the actions described in section 7.01 of these rules.
The Department shall send a copy of the written recommendation to the
applicable Local Board or Institute board and District or Institute
staff.
7.4 When a District or the
Institute has been on Performance Watch for five (5) years, the State Board
shall hold a public hearing to consider the recommendations of the State Review
Panel and the Commissioner for a District or the Institute. The public hearing
shall be held between October 1st and February 28th of the academic school year
in which the District or Institute is Accredited with a Priority Improvement
Plan or Turnaround Plan for the fifth year while on Performance Watch.Prior to
the public hearing, the District or Institute shall have the opportunity to
submit to the State Board a written report detailing the District's or
Institute's preferred course of action, based on the available options
described in section 7.01 of these rules and which best addresses the root
cause(s) for persistent low student performance. At the public hearing, the
District or Institute and the Department shall have an opportunity to present
information to the State Board. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the
State Board may ask the District or Institute and the Department to submit
proposed written final determinations for the State Board's consideration at a
subsequent meeting.
7.5 Per section
22-11-209 (3.5), C.R.S., if a
District or the Institute continues to be Accredited with Priority Improvement
or Turnaround Plan after the State Board initially directs action as described
in sections 7.01 - 7.04 of these rules, then the Commissioner may in any year,
but shall every two years, assign the State Review Panel to critically evaluate
the District's or Institute's performance and recommend one or more of the
actions described in section 7.01 of these rules. The State Board shall
consider the State Review Panel's recommendations, the previously-directed
actions, the fidelity with which the District or Institute has implemented the
directed actions, and whether the amount of time to implement the previously
directed actions is reasonably sufficient to achieve results. At its
discretion, the State Board also may consider the District's or Institute's
2022-23 Accreditation rating. The State Board shall require the District or the
Institute either to continue the previously directed actions or to undertake
additional or different actions outlined in section 7.01 of these
rules.
7.6 If the Department
recommends to the Commissioner and State Board that the State Board remove a
District's or the Institute's Accreditation for the reasons outlined in section
22-11-209(1)(c),
C.R.S., concerning budget and financial policies and procedures or accounting
and financial reporting, the District or Institute shall have the right to
appeal to the State Board before the State Board takes action to remove the
District's or the Institute's accreditation. Any such appeal shall proceed as
follows:
(1) Within ten (10) days of receiving
the Department's written recommendation, the District or Institute shall file
with the State Board notice that the District or Institute wishes to appeal the
recommendation.
(2) Within ten (10)
days of receiving the notice of appeal, the State Board Office shall provide a
scheduling notification to the District or Institute in writing. The scheduling
notification shall provide the date of the next regularly scheduled State Board
meeting. After conferring with the District or the Institute, the State Board
Office shall include in the scheduling notification the filing deadlines for
the appeal. The deadlines set forth below in this section 7.03 of these rules
may be modified by agreement between the Department and the District or
Institute with approval of the State Board Office.
(3) Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of
the scheduling notification, the District or Institute shall file a position
statement setting forth the specific grounds for the assertion that the
District or Institute should not have its Accreditation removed. The District
or the Institute shall provide a copy of the position statement to the
Department.
(4) Within fifteen (15)
days of the date the position statement is filed with the State Board, the
Department may file a Response to the position statement and provide a copy of
the position statement to the District or Institute.
(5) The District or Institute shall file all
relevant documents pertaining to the removal of the District's or Institute's
Accreditation, which may include:
(A) Written
documents issued by the Department recommending removal of
Accreditation;
(B) Written
correspondence between the District or Institute concerning Accreditation;
and
(C) Any other documents,
reports, correspondence and other written or electronic materials related to
the matters at issue.
(6)
The State Board shall hold a hearing on the matter at the earliest possible
regularly scheduled board meeting.
(7) The State Board shall issue a written
final determination on the removal of the District's or Institute's
Accreditation within thirty (30) days of the date of the hearing, and provide a
copy to the District or Institute and the Department. The written determination
shall be final.
7.7 If a
District's or the Institute's Accreditation is removed and the District or the
Institute is reorganized and takes any other actions directed by the State
Board, the State Board shall reinstate the District's or the Institute's
Accreditation at the Accreditation category deemed appropriate by the State
Board.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.