1 CCR 301-69.227611-R-3.00 - Selection Criteria
The following criteria shall be used to identify districts and schools that demonstrate a significant achievement gap and thus are eligible to submit an application for funds:
3.01 Of all the districts and schools in the
state with gaps in achievement status on the Colorado Student Achievement
Program (CSAP) between minority and non-minority groups and poverty and
non-poverty groups, the 10% of districts and schools with the highest gap,
based on CSAP data from the previous 2 consecutive years; and
3.02 Of all the districts and schools in the
state with gaps in growth percentiles for performance on the CSAP between
minority and non-minority groups and poverty and non-poverty groups, the 10% of
districts and schools with the highest growth gaps, based on CSAP growth model
data from the previous 2 consecutive years.
3.03 The following criteria shall be utilized
in determining which Eligible Districts and Eligible Schools shall be selected
to participate in the program:
3.01(a)
Consideration of quantitative achievement data, CSAP and formative data, which
are disaggregated by race, socio-economic status (SES), and gender. Gap
analyses, by subgroup, with an indication of those areas of greatest strength
and need;
3.01(b) A description of
the scope and range of achievement disparities, which include a clear
presentation of the proposed intervention.
3.01(c) An identification of the root cause
for performance disparity, broken out by subgroup, over which the school has
control;
3.01(d) A rubric showing
that the proposed plan is aligned with the district strategic plan, state
expectations for academic content, and student achievement results, including
annual goals and interim targets focused on closing the achievement
gap;
3.01(e) Identification of
specific assessments, using disaggregated assessment data results used in
decision-making related to teacher training, and student achievement progress
monitoring by subgroup;
3.01(f)
Inclusion of culturally responsive practices integrated throughout the
plan;
3.01(g) The time sequence of
events must include major implementation activities with expected completion
dates.
3.01(h) Professional
development shall be considered.
3.01(i) A plan detailing the expenditure of
grant funds, including a budget narrative linked to project goals and
activities;
3.01(j) Demonstration
that the proposed project budget is reasonable and sufficient in relation to
objectives, design, and scope of project activities; and
3.01(k) Identification and description of
formative assessment costs which are paid for by the district, the grant, or
any other sources shall be included in the narrative and in the budget
allocations.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.