4 CCR 723-3-3617 - Commission Review and Approval of Resource Plans
(a)
Review on the merits. The utility's plan, as developed pursuant to rule 3604,
shall be filed as an application; shall meet the requirements of paragraphs
3002(b) and 3002(c); and shall be administered pursuant to the Commission's
Rules Regulating Practice and Procedure. The Commission may hold a hearing for
the purpose of reviewing, and rendering a decision regarding, the contents of
the utility's filed resource plan.
(b) Basis for Commission decision. Based upon
the evidence of record, the Commission shall issue a written decision
approving, disapproving, or ordering modifications, in whole or in part, to the
utility's plan filed in accordance with rule 3604. If the Commission declines
to approve a plan, either in whole or in part, the utility shall make changes
to the plan in response to the Commission's decision. Within 60 days of the
Commission's rejection of a plan, the utility shall file an amended plan with
the Commission and shall provide the amended plan to all parties who
participated in the application proceeding concerning the utility's plan. All
such parties may participate in any hearings regarding the amended
plan.
(c) Contents of the
Commission decision. The Commission decision approving or denying the plan
shall address the contents of the utility's plan filed in accordance with rule
3604. If the record contains sufficient evidence, the Commission shall
specifically approve or modify: the utility's assessment of need for additional
resources in the resource acquisition period; the utility's plans for acquiring
additional resources through an all-source competitive acquisition process or
through an alternative acquisition process; components of the utility's
proposed RFP, such as the model contracts and the proposed evaluation criteria;
and, the alternate scenarios for assessing the costs and benefits from the
potential acquisition of increasing amounts of renewable energy resources,
demand-side resources, energy storage systems, or Section 123 resources. A
Commission decision pursuant to paragraph 3613(h) shall become part of the
decision approving or modifying a utility's plan developed under rule
3604.
(d) Effect of the Commission
decision. A Commission decision specifically approving the components of a
utility's plan creates a presumption that utility actions consistent with that
approval are prudent.
(I) In a proceeding
concerning the utility's request to recover the investments or expenses
associated with new resources.
(A) The utility
must present prima facie evidence that its actions were consistent with
Commission decisions specifically approving or modifying components of the
plan.
(B) To support a Commission
decision to disallow investments or expenses associated with new resources on
the grounds that the utility's actions were not consistent with a Commission
approved plan, an intervenor must present evidence to overcome the utility's
prima facie evidence that its actions were consistent with Commission decisions
approving or modifying components of the plan. Alternatively, an intervenor may
present evidence that, due to changed circumstances timely known to the utility
or that should have been known to a prudent person, the utility's actions were
not proper.
(II) In a
proceeding concerning the utility's request for a CPCN to meet customer need
specifically approved by the Commission in its decision on the final
cost-effective resource plan, the Commission shall take administrative notice
of its decision on the plan. Any party challenging the Commission's decision
regarding need for additional resources has the burden of proving that, due to
a change in circumstances, the Commission's decision on need is no longer
valid.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.