Current through Reg. 47, No. 249; December 28, 2021
(1) The narrative water quality criteria for
nutrients in paragraphs
62-302.530(47)(a)
and (b), F.A.C., applies to all Class I,
Class II, and Class III waters.
(2)
The narrative water quality criterion for nutrients in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., shall be numerically interpreted for both nutrients and nutrient
response variables in a hierarchical manner as follows:
(a) Where a site specific numeric
interpretation of the criterion in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., has been established by the Department, this numeric interpretation
shall be the primary interpretation. If there are multiple interpretations of
the narrative criterion for a waterbody, the most recent interpretation
established by the Department shall apply. A list of the site specific numeric
interpretations of paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., may be obtained from the Department's internet site at
http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wqssp/swq-docs.htm or by writing to the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Water Quality Standards and
Program, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS #6511, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400.
1. The primary site specific interpretations
are as follows:
a. Total Maximum Daily Loads
(TMDLs) adopted under Chapter 62-304, F.A.C., that interpret the narrative
water quality criterion for nutrients in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., for one or more nutrients or nutrient response variables;
b. Site specific alternative criteria (SSAC)
for one or more nutrients or nutrient response variables as established under
Rule
62-302.800,
F.A.C.;
c. Estuary-specific numeric
interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion established in Rule
62-302.532,
F.A.C.; or
d. Other site specific
interpretations for one or more nutrients or nutrient response variables that
are formally established by rule or final order by the Department, such as a
Reasonable Assurance Demonstration pursuant to Rule
62-303.600,
F.A.C., or Level II Water Quality Based Effluent Limitations (WQBEL)
established pursuant to Rule
62-650.500,
F.A.C. To be recognized as the applicable site specific numeric interpretation
of the narrative nutrient criterion, the interpretation must establish the
total allowable load or ambient concentration for at least one nutrient that
results in attainment of the applicable nutrient response variable that
represents achievement of the narrative nutrient criterion for the waterbody. A
site specific interpretation is also allowable where there are documented
adverse biological effects using one or more Biological Health Assessments, if
information on chlorophyll
a levels, algal mats or blooms,
nuisance macrophyte growth, and changes in algal species composition indicate
there are no imbalances in flora and a stressor identification study
demonstrates that the adverse biological effects are not due to
nutrients.
2. For the
primary site specific interpretations in subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(a) 1.,
F.A.C., the notice of rulemaking or other public notice shall state that the
Department is establishing a site specific interpretation for the receiving
waterbody, and offer an opportunity for a public meeting and public
comment.
(b) If site
specific numeric interpretations, as described in paragraph 62-302.531(2)(a),
F.A.C., above, have not been established for a waterbody, but there is an
established, quantifiable cause-and-effect relationship between one or more
nutrients and nutrient response variables linked to a value that protects
against an imbalance in the natural populations of the aquatic flora or fauna,
then the numeric values for the nutrients or nutrient response variables, set
forth in this paragraph (2)(b), shall be the applicable interpretations. Absent
a numeric interpretation as established in paragraph 62-302.531(2)(a), F.A.C.,
site specific numeric interpretations are established as follows:
1. For lakes, the applicable numeric
interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., for chlorophyll
a are shown in the table below. The
applicable interpretations for TN and TP will vary on an annual basis,
depending on the availability of chlorophyll
a data and the
concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll
a in the lake, as
described below. The applicable numeric interpretations for TN, TP, and
chlorophyll
a shall not be exceeded more than once in any
consecutive three year period.
a. If there
are sufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll
a and the mean does not exceed the chlorophyll
a value for the lake type in the table below, then the TN and
TP numeric interpretations for that calendar year shall be the annual geometric
means of lake TN and TP samples, subject to the minimum and maximum limits in
the table below. However, for lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central
Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 0.49 mg/L TP
streams threshold for the region; or
b. If there are insufficient data to
calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll
a for a given
year or the annual geometric mean chlorophyll
a exceeds the
values in the table below for the lake type, then the applicable numeric
interpretations for TN and TP shall be the minimum values in the table below.
Long Term Geometric Mean Lake Color and
Alkalinity |
Annual Geometric Mean Chlorophyll
a
|
Minimum calculated numeric interpretation
|
Maximum calculated numeric interpretation
|
Annual Geometric Mean Total Phosphorus |
Annual Geometric Mean Total Nitrogen |
Annual Geometric Mean Total Phosphorus |
Annual Geometric Mean Total Nitrogen |
> 40 Platinum Cobalt Units |
20 µg/L |
0.05 mg/L |
1.27 mg/L |
0.16 mg/L1
|
2.23 mg/L |
<= 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and > 20 mg/L
CaCO3
|
20 µg/L |
0.03 mg/L |
1.05 mg/L |
0.09 mg/L |
1.91 mg/L |
<= 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and <= 20 mg/L
CaCO3
|
6 µg/L |
0.01 mg/L |
0.51 mg/L |
0.03 mg/L |
0.93 mg/L |
1 For lakes with color > 40 PCU
in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be
the 0.49 mg/L TP streams threshold for the region.
c. For the purpose of subparagraph
62-302.531(2)(b) 1., F.A.C., color shall be assessed as true color and shall be
free from turbidity. Lake color and alkalinity shall be the long-term geometric
mean of all of the data for the period of record, based on a minimum of ten
data points over at least three years with at least one data point in each
year. If insufficient alkalinity data are available, long-term geometric mean
specific conductance values of all of the data for the period of record shall
be used, with a value of <100 micromhos/cm used to estimate the 20 mg/L
CaCO3 alkalinity concentration until such time that
alkalinity data are available. Long-term geometric mean specific conductance
shall be based on a minimum of ten data points over at least three years with
at least one data point in each year.
2. For spring vents, the applicable numeric
interpretation of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., is 0.35 mg/L of nitrate-nitrite (NO
3 +
NO
2) as an annual geometric mean, not to be exceeded
more than once in any three calendar year period.
(c) For streams, if a site specific
interpretation pursuant to paragraph 62-302.531(2)(a) or (2)(b), F.A.C., has
not been established, biological information shall be used to interpret the
narrative nutrient criterion in combination with Nutrient Thresholds. The
narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., shall be interpreted as being achieved in a stream segment where
information on chlorophyll
a levels, algal mats or blooms,
nuisance macrophyte growth, and changes in algal species composition indicates
there are no imbalances in flora or fauna, and either
:
1. The average score of at least two
temporally independent SCIs performed at representative locations and times is
40 or higher, with neither of the two most recent SCI scores less than 35,
or
2. The nutrient thresholds set
forth in the table below are achieved.
Nutrient Watershed Region
|
Total Phosphorus Nutrient
Threshold1
|
Total Nitrogen Nutrient
Threshold1
|
Panhandle West
|
0.06 mg/L
|
0.67 mg/L
|
Panhandle East
|
0.18 mg/L
|
1.03 mg/L
|
North Central
|
0.30 mg/L
|
1.87 mg/L
|
Peninsular
|
0.12 mg/L
|
1.54 mg/L
|
West Central
|
0.49 mg/L
|
1.65 mg/L
|
South Florida
|
No numeric nutrient threshold. The narrative
criterion in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., applies.
|
No numeric nutrient threshold. The narrative
criterion in paragraph
62-302.530(47)(b),
F.A.C., applies.
|
1These values are annual geometric
mean concentrations not to be exceeded more than once in any three calendar
year period.
(3) Except for data used to establish
historical chlorophyll
a levels, chlorophyll
a data assessed under this chapter shall be measured according
to the DEP document titled "Applicability of Chlorophyll a Methods"
(DEP-SAS-002/10), dated October 24, 2011 (
https://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-06043),
which is incorporated by reference herein. Copies of the chlorophyll
a document may be obtained by writing to the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, Water Quality Standards Program, 2600
Blair Stone Road, MS #6511, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400. Chlorophyll
a data collected after [7-3-12] shall be corrected for or free
from the interference of pheophytin.
(4) The loading of nutrients from a waterbody
shall be limited as necessary to provide for the attainment and maintenance of
water quality standards in downstream waters.
(5) To qualify as temporally independent
samples, each SCI shall be conducted at least three months apart. SCIs
collected at the same location less than three months apart shall be considered
one sample, with the mean value used to represent the sampling
period.
(6) To calculate an annual
geometric mean for TN, TP, or chlorophyll a, there shall be at
least four temporally-independent samples per year with at least one sample
taken between May 1 and September 30 and at least one sample taken during the
other months of the calendar year. To be treated as temporally-independent,
samples must be taken at least one week apart.
(7) The numeric interpretation of the
narrative nutrient criterion shall be applied over a spatial area consistent
with its derivation.
(a) For numeric
interpretations based on paragraph 62-302.531(2)(a), F.A.C., the spatial
application of the numeric interpretation is as defined in the associated order
or rule.
(b) For lakes covered
under subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(b) 1., F.A.C., the numeric interpretation
shall be applied as a lake-wide or lake segment-wide average.
(c) For spring vents covered under
subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(b) 2., F.A.C., the numeric interpretation shall be
applied in the surface water at or above the spring vent.
(d) For streams covered under paragraph
62-302.531(2)(c), F.A.C., the spatial application of the numeric interpretation
shall be determined by relative stream homogeneity and shall be applied to
waterbody segments or aggregations of segments as determined by the
site-specific considerations.
(8) Load-based or percent reduction-based
nutrient TMDLs or Level II Water Quality Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
pursuant to Chapter 62-650, F.A.C., do not need to be converted into
concentration-based nutrient TMDLs or WQBELs to be used as the basis for the
numeric interpretation of the narrative criterion. For percent reduction-based
nutrient TMDLs, the associated allowable load or concentration is the numeric
interpretation of the narrative criterion for the waterbody.
(9) The Commission adopts subsections
62-302.200(4),
62-302.200(16)
-(17),
62-302.200(22)
-(25),
62-302.200(35)
-(37),
62-302.200(39),
Rule 62-302.531, and subsection
62-302.532(3),
F.A.C., to ensure, as a matter of policy, that nutrient pollution is addressed
in Florida in an integrated, comprehensive and consistent manner. Accordingly,
these rules shall be effective only if EPA approves these rules in their
entirety, concludes rulemaking that removes federal numeric nutrient criteria
in response to the approval, and determines, in accordance with
33 U.S.C. §
1313(c)(3), that these rules
sufficiently address EPA's January 14, 2009 determination. If any provision of
these rules is determined to be invalid by EPA or in any administrative or
judicial proceeding, then the entirety of these rules shall not be
implemented.