- Insulation

STATE OF HAWAII CODE AMENDMENT PROPOSAL FORM FOR PUBLIC PROPOSALS TO AMEND THE HAWAII STATE BUILDING CODES
(Form Version 1.0 May 2010)

1)

Name: Karen T. Nakamura

Date: November 21, 2011

Department/Company: Building Industry Association of Hawaii

Submitted on Behalf of: Building Industry Association of Hawaii

Address: P.O. Box 970967

City: Waipahu

State: HI Zip Code: 96797-0967

Phone: 808-847-4666

Ext.

7502

Fax: 808-629-7708

E-mail address: ktn@biahawaii.org, gqm@biahawaii.org

2) Indicate appropriate Model Code(s) and Sections to be amended in Hawaii by this Proposal - 2009 International Energy Conservation Code

CODE AMENDMENT PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS
Please provide all of the following items in your code change proposal.
REQUIRED INFORMATION:

The following items are required to be included in your proposal:

1. The proponent shall clearly state the purpose of the proposed code amendment (e.g., clarify the Code; revise outdated material; substitute new or revised material for current provision of the Code; add new Hawaii requirements to the adopted Code; delete current requirements, etc.). Any proposed revisions or additions to tables or figures must be included.

2. The proponent shall justify amending the current code provisions, stating why the proposal is superior to the current provisi ons of the Model Code. Proposals that add or delete requirements shall be supported by a logical explanation which clearly shows why the current Code provisions are inadequate or overly restrictive, specifies the shortcomings of the current Code provisions in Hawaii, and explains how such proposals will improve the Hawaii State Code.

3. The proponent shall substantiate the proposed code change based on technical information and substantiation. Substantiation provided which is determined as not germane to the technical issues addressed in the proposed code change shall be identified as such, and the proponent shall be notified that the proposal is considered an incomplete proposal and may be held until the deficiencies are corrected.

4. The proponent shall submit a bibliography of any substantiating material submitted with the code change proposal. The proponent shall make the substantiating materials available for review.

5. Per Hawaii Revised Statutes §107-26, the State Building Code Council shall not adopt provisions that relate to administrative, permitting, or enforcement and inspection procedures of each county. Any such code amendments shall be proposed instead to the individual county building officials during the code adoption process of each county.

PROPOSAL FORMATTING:

Show the proposal (see form on page 2) using strikeout, underline format. At the beginning of each section, one of the following instruction lines are also needed:

•Revise as follows
•Add new text as follows
•Delete and substitute as follows
•Delete without substitution

The only formatting that is needed is BOLDING, STRIKEOUT AND UNDERLINING. Please do not provide additional formatting such as tabs, columns etc. DO NOT USE THE TRACKING CHANGES OPTION, AUTOMATIC NUMBERING, OR ANY OTHER ADVANCED FORMATTING TOOLS PROVIDED BY WORD.

This Section For Official Use Only

Date Considered by Building Official Sub-Committee:

____________________

Sub-Committee Action on Proposal: ____________________

____________________

Reason for Sub-Committee ____________________

____________________

Action: ____________________

____________________

Action by State Building Code Council: ____________________

Date: ____________________

HAWAII CODE AMENDMENT PROPOSAL FORM
(See instructions on page 1)

Model Code: IECC-09 (ibc-09, iebc, iecc, ufc, imc,upc, irc, etc)

Code Sections/Tables/Figures/Standard Proposed for Revision; If the proposal is for a new section, indicate proposed section #.

____________________

Proponent: Name/Company/Representing: (DO NOT USE ACRONYMS FOR YOUR COMPANY OR ORGANIZATIONAL NAME)

Karen T. Nakamura/Building Industry Association of Hawaii/Building Industry Association of Hawaii

Revise as follows (include deletion in strikeout, with modified text/proposed addition underlined, affected Code Section(s) in Bold):

Revise Section 402.2.5 as follows:

402.2.5 Steel-frame ceilings, walls, and floors. Steel-frame ceilings, walls and floors shall meet the insulation requirements of Table 402.2.5 or shall meet the U-factor requirements in Table 402.1.3. The calculation of the U-factor for a steel-frame envelope assembly shall use a series parallel path calculation method.

Exceptions: In Climate Zones 1 and 2, Tthe continuous insulation requirements in Table 402.2.4 shall be permitted to be reduced to;

1. R-3 for steel frame wall assemblies with studs spaced at 24 inches (610 mm) on center.

2. R-0 for steel frame wall assemblies of buildings that meet one of the following criteria: 2.1). Exterior walls' paint or surface with an average light reflectance value > 0.64 (garages, trim and other non-wall components are exempted),

2.2). Central AC with a minimum efficiency of SEER 14, or

2.3). High efficacy lamps in a minimum of 90 percent of permanently installed lighting fixtures.

Revise Table 405.5.2(1) as follows:

Cooling Systems g,

i

As proposed

Capacity: sized in accordance with Section M1401.3

of the International Residential Code

As

Proposed

Fuel type: Electric

As proposed

Efficiency: in accordance with prevailing federal

minimum standards

As proposed

Capacity: sized in accordance with Section M1401.3

of the International Residential Code

As proposed

Reason:

When developing the proposed trade-offs, consideration was given to federal law, 42 United States Code 77.6297. This law provides specific guidance to states when addressing federally regulated equipment and appliances in state building codes.

According to this law, the states:

• Cannot require the efficiency of federally regulated equipment to exceed the federal minimum, but can permit the efficiency to exceed the minimum
• May permit prescriptive or performance trade-offs using high efficiency equipment, but only on a 1 to 1 trade-off basis (based on either units of energy or costs)
• Currently must use a 13 SEER unit for the reference home's AC system within the performance path. States may permit builders to receive credit for specifying higher SEER units for the design home, but the state may not require the builder to use a unit with an efficiency greater than SEER 13.

Provide multiple, affordable prescriptive path trade-offs for continuous insulation that result in equivalent or better energy performance.

Permit builders to specify high efficiency central air conditioning equipment to provide equivalent or better energy savings than continuous insulation. Specification of high efficiency equipment is expected to result in lower peak energy requirements and lower electricity use. The State of Florida has adopted similar language to this to encourage builders to specify high efficiency equipment in their hot, humid climate (regions of which are very similar to Hawaii).

High Efficiency Air Conditioners: For both the large and small house, specification of a SEER 14 AC unit achieved equivalent energy savings to the continuous insulation. Based on these simulation results, and because federal law requires the state to do a 1 to 1 trade off when using high efficiency mechanical equipment, it is our opinion that the state is not permitted to require an efficiency higher than 14 SEER.

List of Supporting Information References (attached):

Proposals must be submitted using this form and are to be submitted electronically to Council at state.bcc@hawaii.gov or mailed to the Department of Accounting & General Services, Administrative Services Office, 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 414, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

The following state regulations pages link to this page.