A) It exhibits any of the
characteristics of hazardous waste identified in Subpart C. However, any
mixture of a waste from the extraction, beneficiation, and processing of ores
and minerals excluded pursuant to Section
721.104(b)(7)
and any other solid waste exhibiting a characteristic of hazardous waste
pursuant to Subpart C is a hazardous waste only if it exhibits a characteristic
that would not have been exhibited by the excluded waste alone if such mixture
had not occurred, or if the mixture continues to exhibit any of the
characteristics exhibited by the non-excluded wastes prior to mixture. Further,
for the purposes of applying the toxicity characteristic to such mixtures, the
mixture is also a hazardous waste if it exceeds the maximum concentration for
any contaminant listed in Section
721.124
that would not have been exceeded by the excluded waste alone if the mixture
had not occurred or if it continues to exceed the maximum concentration for any
contaminant exceeded by the nonexempt waste prior to mixture.
D) It is a mixture of
solid waste and one or more hazardous wastes listed in Subpart D and has not
been excluded from this subsection (a)(2) pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code
720.120 and
720.122 or
subsection (g) or (h); however, the following mixtures of solid wastes and
hazardous wastes listed in Subpart D are not hazardous wastes (except by
application of subsection (a)(2)(A) or (a)(2)(B)) if the generator demonstrates
that the mixture consists of wastewater the discharge of which is subject to
regulation under either 35 Ill. Adm. Code
309 or
310 (including wastewater at
facilities that have eliminated the discharge of wastewater) and the following
is true of the waste:
i) It is one or more of
the following solvents listed in Section
721.131:
benzene, carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene or the
scrubber waters derived from the combustion of these spent solvents, provided
that the maximum total weekly usage of these solvents (other than the amounts
that can be demonstrated not to be discharged to wastewater) divided by the
average weekly flow of wastewater into the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment or pretreatment system does not exceed 1 part per million,
or the total measured concentration of these solvents entering the headworks of
the facility's wastewater treatment system (at a facility that is subject to
regulation under the federal Clean Air Act new source performance standards or
national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants of 40 CFR
60,
61, or
63 or at a facility that is subject to an enforceable limit in a federal
operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions) does not exceed 1 part per
million on an average weekly basis. Any facility that uses benzene as a solvent
and claims this exemption must use an aerated biological wastewater treatment
system and must use only lined surface impoundments or tanks prior to secondary
clarification in the wastewater treatment system. A facility that chooses to
measure concentration levels must file a copy of its sampling and analysis plan
with the Agency. A facility must file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis
plan only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the
facility's operations. The sampling and analysis plan must include the
monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology,
and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the
direct monitoring option once it receives confirmation that the sampling and
analysis plan has been received by the Agency. The Agency must reject the
sampling and analysis plan if it determines that the sampling and analysis plan
fails to include the information required by this subsection (a)(2)(D)(i) or
that the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate the weekly
average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Agency rejects the
sampling and analysis plan, or if the Agency determines that the facility is
not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Agency must notify the
facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as
the bases for rejection are corrected;
ii) It is one or more of the following spent
solvents listed in Section 721.131: methylene chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane,
chlorobenzene, o-dichlorobenzene, cresols, cresylic acid, nitrobenzene,
toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, carbon disulfide, isobutanol, pyridine, spent
chlorofluorocarbon solvents, 2-ethoxyethanol, or the scrubber waters
derived-from the combustion of these spent solvents, provided that the maximum
total weekly usage of these solvents (other than the amounts that can be
demonstrated not to be discharged to wastewater) divided by the average weekly
flow of wastewater into the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment or
pretreatment system does not exceed 25 parts per million, or the total measured
concentration of these solvents entering the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system (at a facility that is subject to regulation under
the federal Clean Air Act new source performance standards or national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants of 40 CFR
60,
61, or
63 or at a facility
that is subject to an enforceable limit in a federal operating permit that
minimizes fugitive emissions) does not exceed 25 parts per million on an
average weekly basis. A facility that chooses to measure concentration levels
must file a copy of its sampling and analysis plan with the Agency. A facility
must file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis plan only if the initial
plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the facility's operations. The
sampling and analysis plan must include the monitoring point location
(headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology, and a list of constituents
to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the direct monitoring option once
it receives confirmation that the sampling and analysis plan has been received
by the Agency. The Agency must reject the sampling and analysis plan if it
determines that the sampling and analysis plan fails to include the information
required by this subsection (a)(2)(D)(ii) or that the plan parameters would not
enable the facility to calculate the weekly average concentration of these
chemicals accurately. If the Agency rejects the sampling and analysis plan, or
if the Agency determines that the facility is not following the sampling and
analysis plan, the Agency must notify the facility to cease the use of the
direct monitoring option until such time as the bases for rejection are
corrected;
iii) It is one of the
following wastes listed in Section
721.132,
provided that the wastes are discharged to the refinery oil recovery sewer
before primary oil/water/solids separation: heat exchanger bundle cleaning
sludge from the petroleum refining industry (USEPA hazardous waste number
K050), crude oil storage tank sediment from petroleum refining operations
(USEPA hazardous waste number K169), clarified slurry oil tank sediment or
in-line filter/separation solids from petroleum refining operations (USEPA
hazardous waste number K170), spent hydrotreating catalyst (USEPA hazardous
waste number K171), and spent hydrorefining catalyst (USEPA hazardous waste
number K172);
iv) It is a discarded
hazardous waste, commercial chemical product or chemical intermediate listed in
Section
721.121,
721.132, or 721.133 arising from de minimis losses of these materials. For
purposes of this subsection (a)(2)(D)(iv), "de minimis" losses are inadvertent
releases to a wastewater treatment system, including those from normal material
handling operations (e.g., spills from the unloading or transfer of materials
from bins or other containers, leaks from pipes, valves, or other devices used
to transfer materials); minor leaks of process equipment, storage tanks, or
containers; leaks from well-maintained pump packings and seals; sample
purgings; relief device discharges; discharges from safety showers and rinsing
and cleaning of personal safety equipment; and rinsate from empty containers or
from containers that are rendered empty by that rinsing. Any manufacturing
facility that claims an exemption for de minimis quantities of a waste listed
in Section
721.131
or 721.132, or any nonmanufacturing facility that claims an exemption for de
minimis quantities of wastes listed in Subpart D, must either have eliminated
the discharge of wastewaters or have included in its federal Clean Water Act (
33 USC
1251 et seq.) permit application or
wastewater pretreatment submission to the Agency or the wastewater pretreatment
Control Authority pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code
307 of the constituents for
which each waste was listed (in Appendix G); and the constituents in Table T to
35 Ill. Adm. Code
728 for which each waste has a treatment standard
(i.e
., land disposal restriction constituents). A facility is
eligible to claim the exemption once the Agency or Control Authority has been
notified of possible de minimis releases via the Clean Water Act permit
application or the wastewater pretreatment submission. A copy of the Clean
Water Act permit application or the wastewater pretreatment submission must be
placed in the facility's on-site files;
v) It is wastewater resulting from laboratory
operations containing toxic (T) wastes listed in Subpart D, provided that the
annualized average flow of laboratory wastewater does not exceed one percent of
total wastewater flow into the headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment
or pretreatment system or provided that the wastes' combined annualized average
concentration does not exceed one part per million in the headworks of the
facility's wastewater treatment or pretreatment facility. Toxic (T) wastes used
in laboratories that are demonstrated not to be discharged to wastewater are
not to be included in this calculation;
vi) It is one or more of the following wastes
listed in Section 721.132: wastewaters from the production of carbamates and
carbamoyl oximes (USEPA hazardous waste number K157), provided that the maximum
weekly usage of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and
triethylamine (including all amounts that cannot be demonstrated to be reacted
in the process, destroyed through treatment, or recovered, i.e., what is
discharged or volatilized) divided by the average weekly flow of process
wastewater prior to any dilutions into the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system does not exceed a total of 5 parts per million by
weight, or the total measured concentration of these chemicals entering the
headworks of the facility's wastewater treatment system (at a facility that is
subject to regulation under the federal Clean Air Act new source performance
standards or national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants of 40 CFR
60,
61, or
63 or at a facility that is subject to an enforceable limit in a
federal operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions) does not exceed 5
parts per million on an average weekly basis. A facility that chooses to
measure concentration levels must file a copy of its sampling and analysis plan
with the Agency. A facility must file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis
plan only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the
facility's operations. The sampling and analysis plan must include the
monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology,
and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the
direct monitoring option once it receives confirmation that the sampling and
analysis plan has been received by the Agency. The Agency must reject the
sampling and analysis plan if it determines that the sampling and analysis plan
fails to include the information required by this subsection (a)(2)(D)(vi) or
that the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate the weekly
average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Agency rejects the
sampling and analysis plan, or if the Agency determines that the facility is
not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Agency must notify the
facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as
the bases for rejection are corrected; or
vii) It is wastewater derived from the
treatment of one or more of the following wastes listed in Section 721.132:
organic waste (including heavy ends, still bottoms, light ends, spent solvents,
filtrates, and decantates) from the production of carbamates and carbamoyl
oximes (USEPA hazardous waste number K156), provided that the maximum
concentration of formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and
triethylamine prior to any dilutions into the headworks of the facility's
wastewater treatment system does not exceed a total of 5 milligrams per liter,
or the total measured concentration of these chemicals entering the headworks
of the facility's wastewater treatment system (at a facility that is subject to
regulation under the federal Clean Air Act new source performance standards or
national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants of 40 CFR
60,
61, or
63 or at a facility that is subject to an enforceable limit in a federal
operating permit that minimizes fugitive emissions) does not exceed 5
milligrams per liter on an average weekly basis. A facility that chooses to
measure concentration levels must file a copy of its sampling and analysis plan
with the Agency. A facility must file a copy of a revised sampling and analysis
plan only if the initial plan is rendered inaccurate by changes in the
facility's operations. The sampling and analysis plan must include the
monitoring point location (headworks), the sampling frequency and methodology,
and a list of constituents to be monitored. A facility is eligible for the
direct monitoring option once it receives confirmation that the sampling and
analysis plan has been received by the Agency. The Agency must reject the
sampling and analysis plan if it determines that the sampling and analysis plan
fails to include the information required by this subsection (a)(2)(D)(vii) or
that the plan parameters would not enable the facility to calculate the weekly
average concentration of these chemicals accurately. If the Agency rejects the
sampling and analysis plan, or if the Agency determines that the facility is
not following the sampling and analysis plan, the Agency must notify the
facility to cease the use of the direct monitoring option until such time as
the bases for rejection are corrected.
E) Rebuttable presumption for used oil. Used
oil containing more than 1,000 ppm total halogens is presumed to be a hazardous
waste because it has been mixed with halogenated hazardous waste listed in
Subpart D. Persons may rebut this presumption by demonstrating that the used
oil does not contain hazardous waste (for example, to show that the used oil
does not contain significant concentrations of halogenated hazardous
constituents listed in Appendix H).
i) The
rebuttable presumption does not apply to a metalworking oil or fluid containing
chlorinated paraffins if it is processed through a tolling arrangement, as
described in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
739.124(c),
to reclaim metalworking oils or fluids. The presumption does apply to a
metalworking oil or fluid if such an oil or fluid is recycled in any other
manner, or disposed of.
ii) The
rebuttable presumption does not apply to a used oil contaminated with
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) removed from refrigeration units where the CFCs are
destined for reclamation. The rebuttable presumption does apply to a used oil
contaminated with CFCs that have been mixed with used oil from a source other
than a refrigeration unit.