The administrative appeal hearing shall consist of a
pre-hearing conference and a hearing date during which testimony is taken and
evidence is received. The appellant or the appellant's authorized
representative shall be prepared to participate at all pre-hearing conferences
and hearings. Hearings shall be recorded; however, any party wishing to have
the proceedings recorded by a certified court reporter may do so at the party's
own expense.
a) Pre-Hearing Conference
The pre-hearing conference shall be convened by telephone
unless the ALJ and the parties agree that the pre-hearing conference shall be
held in person. The ALJ shall place all telephone calls. The cost of telephone
calls will be borne by the Department. The AHU shall arrange for the appellant
to use a telephone at a Department Field Office if the appellant has previously
notified the Department that he/she does not have access to a telephone.
1) At the pre-hearing conference, the ALJ
shall provide the parties with standard admonishments that shall include a
statement of the rights of the parties and the right to have a timely hearing
within the applicable timeframe, as well as the setting of dates for the
administrative appeal hearing.
2)
During the pre-hearing conference, the appellant and the Department should be
prepared to discuss:
A) potential
witnesses;
B) exhibits that might
be offered;
C) timeframes for the
administrative appeal hearing;
D)
any potential motions that could be filed;
E) any other issues that would impact the
timing and length of the administrative appeal hearing, such as, but not
limited to, whether any of the witnesses require a special accommodation or a
translator; and
F) The Department's
legal representative and the appellant and his or her representative have an
affirmative duty to determine if there is, and to report to the ALJ before any
hearing is scheduled, any pending criminal case or juvenile court case
concerning the circumstances that gave rise to the indicated report.
b) The ALJ shall
address the following issues during the pre-hearing conference:
1) If the appellant asserts, at the
pre-hearing conference, that he or she is a child care worker who was not
afforded an Administrator's Teleconference during the child abuse and neglect
investigation (see 89 Ill. Adm. Code
300 (Reports of Child Abuse and Neglect)),
the appellant may request a review of the investigation. The ALJ may request
documentation to validate the child care worker status of the appellant. The
review shall be conducted jointly by the Division of Child Protection and the
Office of Legal Services and shall determine if the case should be unfounded or
if a hearing date will be set. The review must be conducted within 14 days from
the date of the pre-hearing conference in which the appellant claims he or she
is a child care worker who was not afforded an Administrator's Teleconference
during the child abuse and neglect determination. Any time expended for the
review process will be attributed to the appellant and not to the Department
(see Section
336.220(a)(1) or
(2) ).
2) Whether parties have exchanged lists of
the names of persons who may provide testimony during the administrative
hearing.
3) Whether children may
testify or be involved in the hearing.
A)
Either party requesting that a child be subpoenaed to testify or be involved in
the hearing process must demonstrate at the pre-hearing conference that:
i) the child's testimony or involvement is
essential to a determination of an issue on appeal;
ii) the likelihood of inflicting emotional
harm to the particular child involved can be minimized with conditions and
restrictions and the child's testimony is necessary for the interests of
justice; and
iii) no alternatives,
such as stipulations or transcripts from prior court hearings, exist that may
be used as a substitute for the child's testimony.
B) In determining whether a child will
testify, the ALJ must consider, when available, the opinion of the child's
treating clinician regarding the impact on the child if the child is permitted
to testify or not permitted to testify, and how any negative impact could best
be minimized for the particular child.
i) The
ALJ must balance the hardship on the child, taking into account possible
restrictions or modifications described in subsection (c)(3)(B)(ii), against
the interests of justice and the harm to the child if an appeal is improperly
denied or an indicated finding is improperly expunged.
ii) If an ALJ allows a child to testify, the
ALJ may set any conditions or restrictions, and may use any techniques allowed
in any juvenile, civil or criminal court (including but not limited to in
camera interviews, video conferences, questions submitted in writing, exclusion
of parties to the proceeding (including but not limited to the parents), or
change of hearing room or location) that will help minimize any emotional
impact on the child.
4) Whether:
A) the parties agree to hold the hearing by
telephone or video conference;
B)
whether witnesses should be scheduled to testify at specific times;
C) there are any witnesses, such as medical
professionals, that should be permitted to testify telephonically;
and
D) whether there are any
non-professional witnesses who should be allowed to testify
telephonically.
5)
Whether the parties have or will have exchanged records or documents prior to
the administrative hearing.
6)
Whether the parties can agree upon any facts as true.
7) Motions Filed by Any Party
A) Any motions from the appellant or the
Department shall be filed with the ALJ and served upon the AHU and the opposing
party within a reasonable time prior to the hearing.
B) Any motion that is consistent with
administrative practice and procedure and does not infringe upon the Director's
authority may be heard.
C) Motions
filed shall be filed in accordance with any motion practice and timelines
established by the ALJ responsible for hearing the case.
D) If any party believes that a finding in a
juvenile court proceeding is dispositive to an issue on a pending
administrative appeal, he or she may file a motion, with supporting
documentation, requesting the appropriate relief.
8) The need of either party for an
interpreter in his/her preferred language or for communication
assistance.
9) Whether any juvenile
or criminal cases related to the indicated finding on appeal are pending in
circuit court. If the ALJ discovers during the pre-hearing conference that
there is a pending juvenile or criminal case arising from the same set of facts
as the indicated finding, the appeal will be dismissal as premature. The
perpetrator shall be informed orally that, within 60 days after the conclusion
of any criminal court action in the circuit court, or after adjudication in any
juvenile court action concerning the circumstances that give rise to an
indicated report, he or she may again file a request, except that there shall
be no such right to a hearing on the ground of the report's inaccuracy if there
has been a court finding of child abuse or neglect or a criminal finding of
guilt as to the perpetrator. The dismissal order shall also state that the
perpetrator may file an administrative appeal within 60 days after the
conclusion of the criminal court action in circuit court or after adjudication
in any juvenile court action, except that there shall be no right to an
administrative appeal if there has been a court finding of child abuse or
neglect or a criminal finding of guilt as to the perpetrator.
10) Upon notification from the Department's
legal representative or the perpetrator that a criminal or juvenile court
action is pending, based on the same facts or circumstances as the
administrative expungement appeal, the appeal will be dismissed as premature.
The dismissal order shall state that the perpetrator may file an administrative
appeal within 60 days after the conclusion of the criminal court action in
circuit court or after adjudication in any juvenile court action, except that
there shall be no right to an administrative appeal if there has been a court
finding of child abuse or neglect or a criminal finding of guilt as to the
perpetrator.