68 IAC 13-1-14 - Proceedings
Authority: IC 4-33-3-23; IC 4-33-4; IC 4-35-4
Affected: IC 4-21.5-3; IC 4-33; IC 4-35
Sec. 14.
(a) The
burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the
affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence
that the:
(1) respondent should be
disciplined; or
(2) gaming device
or gaming devices should be seized and forfeited.
(b) The respondent has the:
(1) burden of proof to prove the allegations
contained in any affirmative defense contained in the answer; and
(2) affirmative responsibility of
establishing the elements of an affirmative defense by a preponderance of the
evidence.
(c) Any
testimony must be given under oath or affirmation. The administrative law judge
and recorder are authorized to administer oaths.
(d) Both parties may present an opening
statement on the merits. The commission proceeds first, followed by the
respondent. The respondent may not reserve opening statement for a later time.
The administrative law judge may determine the length of opening
statements.
(e) The commission must
then present the commission's case-in-chief.
(f) Upon conclusion of the commission's
case-in-chief, the respondent may move for a directed finding. The
administrative law judge may:
(1) hear
arguments on the motion; or
(2)
grant, deny, or reserve any decision thereon, with or without
argument.
(g) If:
(1) no motion for directed finding is made;
or
(2) such motion is denied or
decision reserved thereon; the respondent may present its case.
(h) Each party may conduct
cross-examination of adverse witnesses.
(i) Upon conclusion of the respondent's case,
the commission may present evidence in rebuttal.
(j) The administrative law judge may:
(1) ask questions of the witnesses;
and
(2) request or allow additional
evidence at any time, including additional rebuttal evidence.
(k) Both parties may present
closing argument. The commission proceeds first, then the respondent, and,
thereafter, the commission may present rebuttal argument. The administrative
law judge may determine the length of closing arguments.
(l) The administrative law judge may require
or allow the parties to submit posthearing briefs or proposed findings of fact
and conclusions of law, or both, within:
(1)
ten (10) days of the conclusion of the hearing; or
(2) such other time period the administrative
law judge might order.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.