Iowa Admin. Code r. 193-7.10 - Presiding officer
(1) The
presiding officer in all licensee disciplinary contested cases will be the
board , a panel of board members, or a panel of nonboard member specialists as
provided in Iowa Code sections
272C.6(1) and
272C.6(2). When
board members act as presiding officer , they will conduct the hearing and issue
either a final decision or, if a quorum of the board is not present, a proposed
decision. As provided in subrule 7.10(4), the board may be assisted by an
administrative law judge when the board acts as presiding officer .
(2) In cases that do not pertain to licensee
discipline, the board may act as presiding officer or may notify the parties
that an administrative law judge will act as presiding officer at hearing and
issue a proposed decision. The use of an administrative law judge as presiding
officer is only an option in cases that do not pertain to licensee discipline
because only the board may conduct licensee discipline hearings pursuant to
Iowa Code section 272C.6. Any party to a
nondisciplinary case who wishes to request that the presiding officer assigned
to render a proposed decision be an administrative law judge employed by the
department of inspections, appeals, and licensing will need to file a written
request within 20 days after service of a notice of hearing that identifies the
presiding officer as the board . The board may deny the request only upon a
finding that one or more of the following apply:
a. Neither the board nor any officer of the
board under whose authority the contested case is to take place is a named
party to the proceeding or a real party in interest to that
proceeding.
b. There is a
compelling need to expedite issuance of a final decision in order to protect
the public health, safety, or welfare.
c. The case involves a disciplinary hearing
to be held by the board pursuant to Iowa Code section
272C.6.
d. The case involves significant policy
issues of first impression that are inextricably intertwined with the factual
issues presented.
e. The demeanor
of the witnesses is likely to be dispositive in resolving the disputed factual
issues.
f. Funds are unavailable to
pay the costs of an administrative law judge and an interboard
appeal.
g. The request was not
timely filed.
h. The request is not
consistent with a specified statute.
(3) The board will issue a written ruling
specifying the grounds for its decision within 20 days after a request for an
administrative law judge is filed. If the ruling is granted, the administrative
law judge assigned to act as presiding officer and issue a proposed decision in
a nondisciplinary contested case will have a J.D. degree unless waived by the
board .
(4) The board or a panel of
board members when acting as presiding officer may request that an
administrative law judge perform certain functions as an aid to the board or
board panel, such as ruling on prehearing motions, conducting the prehearing
conference, ruling on evidentiary objections at hearing, assisting in
deliberations, or drafting the written decision for review by the board or
board panel.
(5) All rulings by an
administrative law judge who acts either as presiding officer or assistant to
the board are subject to appeal to the board pursuant to rules
193-7.31 (17A) and
193-7.32 (17A). A party will
need to timely seek intra-agency appeal of prehearing rulings or proposed
decisions in order to exhaust adequate administrative remedies. While a party
may seek immediate board or board panel review of rulings made by an
administrative law judge when sitting with and acting as an aid to the board or
board panel during a hearing, such immediate review is not required to preserve
error for judicial review.
(6)
Unless otherwise provided by law, board members have the powers of and will
comply with the provisions of this chapter that apply to presiding officers
when reviewing a proposed decision of a panel of the board or an administrative
law judge.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.