Iowa Admin. Code r. 591-4.9 - Variance between adopted rule and published notice of proposed rule adoption
(1) The board shall
not adopt a rule that differs from the rule proposed in the Notice of Intended
Action on which the rule is based unless:
a.
The differences are within the scope of the subject matter announced in the
Notice of Intended Action and are in character with the issues raised in that
notice; and
b. The differences are
a logical outgrowth of the contents of that Notice of Intended Action and the
comments submitted in response thereto; and
c. The Notice of Intended Action provided
fair warning that the outcome of that rule-making proceeding could be the rule
in question.
(2) In
determining whether the Notice of Intended Action provided fair warning that
the outcome of that rule-making proceeding could be the rule in question, the
board shall consider the following factors:
a.
The extent to which persons who will be affected by the rule should have
understood that the rule-making proceeding on which it is based could affect
their interests;
b. The extent to
which the subject matter of the rule or the issues determined by the rule are
different from the subject matter or issues contained in the Notice of Intended
Action; and
c. The extent to which
the effects of the rule differ from the effects of the proposed rule contained
in the Notice of Intended Action.
(3) The board shall commence a rule-making
proceeding within 60 days of its receipt of a petition for rule making seeking
the amendment or repeal of a rule that differs from the proposed rule contained
in the Notice of Intended Action upon which the rule is based, unless the board
finds that the differences between the adopted rule and the proposed rule are
so insubstantial as to make such a rule-making proceeding wholly unnecessary. A
copy of any such finding and the petition to which it responds shall be sent to
petitioner, the administrative rules coordinator, and the administrative rules
review committee, within three days of its issuance.
(4) Concurrent rule-making proceedings.
Nothing in this rule disturbs the discretion of the board to initiate,
concurrently, several different rule-making proceedings on the same subject
with several different published Notices of Intended Action.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.