Iowa Admin. Code r. 61-9.57 - Selection process
The
(1) In selection
of competitive applicants, the program may utilize generally accepted methods
of grant review, including but not limited to checklists; quality scales;
written comments by application review committee members; and formulas based on
past funding, population, clients served and available funds.
(2) In selection of competitive applications,
the program shall establish an application review committee . The committee
shall submit recommendations for funding awards to the chief . The chief shall
submit to the board the recommendations of the application review committee and
any alternative recommendations by the program staff.
a. The application review committee shall be
comprised of representatives from the victim assistance board and experts in
the fields of victim services, funding administration and management, and
criminal justice. Committee members shall be selected solely by section
staff.
b. The program shall provide
the committee with information related to an applicant 's performance with
previous awards, the quality and quantity of services provided, and community
support for an applicant .
c. The
committee shall review the contents of the applications and information
provided by the section and members of the committee regarding an applicant and
the geographical area to be served.
(3) The board shall consider the
recommendations of the application review committee and the chief to determine
final competitive awards to the extent that funds are available and to the
extent to which applications meet the application criteria. The board may
reject any or all applications.
(4)
In selection of an applicant for a focus grant, a written proposal shall be
solicited from current grantees. Interested grantees shall submit a proposal to
the chief outlining the purpose, cost, and outcome of the proposed activities
and funds. The chief shall submit a recommendation to the deputy attorney
general for criminal justice who oversees the section , and the deputy attorney
general shall make a final decision based on the availability of funds and the
merits of the proposal.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.