Iowa Code r. 189-22.23 - Ex parte communication
(1) Prohibited communications. Unless
required for the disposition of ex parte matters specifically authorized by
statute, following issuance of the notice of hearing, there shall be no
communication, directly or indirectly, between the presiding officer and any
party or representative of any party or any other person with a direct or
indirect interest in such case in connection with any issue of fact or law in
the case except upon notice and opportunity for all parties to participate.
This does not prohibit persons jointly assigned such tasks from communicating
with each other. Nothing in this provision is intended to preclude the
presiding officer from communicating with members of the division or seeking
the advice or help of persons other than those with a personal interest in, or
those engaged in personally investigating as defined in subrule 22.9(2),
prosecuting, or advocating in, either the case under consideration or a pending
factually related case involving the same parties as long as those persons do
not directly or indirectly communicate to the presiding officer any ex parte
communications they have received of a type that the presiding officer would be
prohibited from receiving or that furnish, augment, diminish, or modify the
evidence in the record.
(2)
Prohibitions on ex parte communications commence with the issuance of the
notice of hearing in a contested case and continue for as long as the case is
pending.
(3) Written, oral or other
forms of communication are "ex parte" if made without notice and opportunity
for all parties to participate.
(4)
To avoid prohibited ex parte communications, notice must be given in a manner
reasonably calculated to give all parties a fair opportunity to participate.
Notice of written communications shall be provided in compliance with rule
22.12(17A) and may be supplemented by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail or
other means of notification. Where permitted, oral communications may be
initiated through conference telephone call including all parties or their
representatives.
(5) Persons who
jointly act as presiding officer in a pending contested case may communicate
with each other without notice or opportunity for parties to
participate.
(6) The executive
director or other persons may be present in deliberations or otherwise advise
the presiding officer without notice or opportunity for parties to participate
as long as they are not disqualified from participating in the making of a
proposed or final decision under any provision of law and they comply with
subrule 22.23(1).
(7)
Communications with the presiding officer involving uncontested scheduling or
procedural matters do not require notice or opportunity for parties to
participate. Parties should notify other parties prior to initiating such
contact with the presiding officer when feasible, and shall notify other
parties when seeking to continue hearings or other deadlines pursuant to rule
22.17(17A).
(8) Disclosure of
prohibited communications. A presiding officer who receives a prohibited ex
parte communication during the pendency of a contested case must initially
determine if the effect of the communication is so prejudicial that the
presiding officer should be disqualified. If the presiding officer determines
that disqualification is warranted, a copy of any prohibited written
communication, all written responses to the communication, a written summary
stating the substance of any prohibited oral or other communication not
available in written form for disclosure, all responses made, and the identity
of each person from whom the presiding officer received a prohibited ex parte
communication shall be submitted for inclusion in the record under seal by
protective order. If the presiding officer determines that disqualification is
not warranted, such documents shall be submitted for inclusion in the record
and served on all parties. Any party desiring to rebut the prohibited
communication must be allowed the opportunity to do so upon written request
filed within ten days after notice of the communication.
(9) Promptly after being assigned to serve as
presiding officer at any stage in a contested case proceeding, a presiding
officer shall disclose to all parties material factual information received
through ex parte communication prior to such assignment unless the factual
information has already been or shortly will be disclosed pursuant to Iowa Code
section 17A.13(2) or
through discovery. Factual information contained in an investigative report or
similar document need not be separately disclosed by the presiding officer as
long as such documents have been or will shortly be provided to the
parties.
(10) The presiding officer
may render a proposed or final decision imposing appropriate sanctions for
violations of this rule including default, a decision against the offending
party, censure, or suspension or revocation of the privilege to practice before
the division. Violation of ex parte communication prohibitions by division
personnel shall be reported to the superintendent for possible sanctions
including censure, suspension, dismissal, or other disciplinary
action.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.