Section 1. Definitions.
(1) "Advanced practice doctorate" means a
program of study beyond the master's degree designed to meet the workforce and
applied research needs of a profession.
(2) "Board" or "governing board" is defined
by KRS
164.001(4).
(3) "College" means an administrative unit
within a state university, which consists of related academic disciplines, that
offers academic programs but does not have the authority to grant a
degree.
(4) "Comprehensive
university" is defined by
KRS
164.001(7).
(5) "Council" is defined by
KRS
164.001(8).
(6) "Learning outcomes" is defined by
KRS
164.001(25).
(7) "Postsecondary education system" is
defined by KRS
164.001(17).
(8) "Public" is defined by
KRS
164.001(19).
(9) "Southern Association of Colleges and
Schools Commission on Colleges" means the regional body for the accreditation
of degree-granting higher education institutions in Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Texas, Virginia, Latin America, and other international sites.
(10) "Specialization" means a set of courses
designed to develop expertise within a major at the doctoral level.
(11) "Strategic agenda" is defined by
KRS
164.001(23).
Section 2. General Requirements.
(1) In submitting the Pre-Proposal for a New
Academic Program required by Section 3(1) of this administrative regulation and
the Proposal for a New Doctoral Program required by Section 3(5) of this
administrative regulation, a comprehensive university shall demonstrate that an
advanced practice doctorate adheres to the role and scope of the institution as
set forth in its mission statement and as complemented by the institution's
academic plan by:
(a) Listing the objectives
of the advanced practice doctorate;
(b) Providing a copy of the curriculum and
explaining how the advanced practice doctorate relates to the institutional
mission and strategic plan;
(c)
Explaining how the advanced practice doctorate addresses the state's
postsecondary education strategic agenda; and
(d) Explaining how the advanced practice
doctorate furthers the statewide implementation plan for the strategic
agenda.
(2) In
submitting the Pre-Proposal for a New Academic Program required by Section 3(1)
of this administrative regulation and the Proposal for a New Doctoral Program
required by Section 3(5) of this administrative regulation, a comprehensive
university shall demonstrate program quality and commitment to student success
by:
(a) Listing all learning
outcomes;
(b) Explaining how the
curriculum achieves the objectives of the advanced practice doctorate by
describing the relationship between the overall curriculum or the major
curricular components and the objectives;
(c) Highlighting any distinctive qualities of
the advanced practice doctorate;
(d) Noting whether the advanced practice
doctorate will replace any specializations within another doctorate
program;
(e) Including the
projected ratio of faculty to students;
(f) Explaining if the comprehensive
university will seek specialized accreditation if accreditation exists for the
advanced practice doctorate;
(g)
Demonstrating that faculty possesses terminal degrees, master's degrees with
professional experience in the field of study, and research
experience;
(h) Demonstrating that
library resources meet standards for study at the doctoral level and in a
particular field of study if standards are available from the Southern
Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges or a specialized
accrediting agency for a specific field of study;
(i) Demonstrating availability of classroom,
laboratory, office space, and specialized equipment;
(j) Explaining the admission and retention
standards;
(k) Stating the degree
completion requirements;
(l)
Describing how the advanced practice doctorate articulates with related
programs at other comprehensive universities and at the University of Kentucky
and the University of Louisville;
(m) Providing course descriptions for all
courses that will be offered as part of the advanced practice
doctorate;
(n) Describing
alternative methods of program delivery involving use of technology, distance
education, or accelerated degree designs;
(o) Describing how the advanced practice
doctorate builds upon the reputation and resources of the comprehensive
university's existing master's degree program in the field of study;
(p) Explaining the impact of the advanced
practice doctorate on undergraduate education at the comprehensive university;
and
(q) Discussing the nature and
appropriateness of available clinical sites if there is a clinical component to
the advanced practice doctorate.
(3) In submitting the Pre-Proposal for a New
Academic Program required by Section 3(1) of this administrative regulation and
the Proposal for a New Doctoral Program required by Section 3(5) of this
administrative regulation, a comprehensive university shall demonstrate demand
for the advanced practice doctorate and lack of unnecessary duplication by:
(a) Providing evidence of student demand at
the regional, state, and national levels;
(b) Identifying the potential pool of
students and how potential students will be contacted;
(c) Describing the student recruitment and
selection process;
(d) Identifying
the undergraduate and master's level programs as well as employers from which
students will be identified;
(e)
Providing any evidence of a projected net increase in total student enrollments
to the campus as a result of the advanced practice doctorate;
(f) Estimating student enrollment, doctoral
candidacies, and degrees conferred for the first five (5) years of the
program;
(g) Describing the types
of jobs available for graduates, average wages for these jobs, and the number
of anticipated openings for each type of job at the regional, state, and
national levels;
(h) Justifying the
advanced practice doctorate based on changes in the field of study or other
academic reasons;
(i) Explaining
new practice or licensure requirements in the profession and new requirements
by specialized accrediting agencies;
(j) Identifying similar advanced practice
doctoral programs in the member states of the Southern Regional Education
Board; and
(k) Comparing the
program to similar programs within Kentucky in terms of curriculum or areas of
specialization, student populations, access to similar programs, demand for
similar programs, and potential for collaboration between the proposed program
and similar programs.
(4) In submitting the Pre-Proposal for a New
Academic Program required by Section 3(1) of this administrative regulation and
the Proposal for a New Doctoral Program required by Section 3(5) of this
administrative regulation, a comprehensive university shall demonstrate costs
and funding sources for the advanced practice doctorate by:
(a) Identifying any necessary additional
resources;
(b) Explaining the
financial impact on existing programs and organizational units within the
comprehensive university;
(c)
Demonstrating sufficient return on investment to Kentucky to offset new
costs;
(d) Obtaining letters from
other comprehensive universities stating that there will not be a negative
financial impact on any of their existing programs;
(e) Providing financial and enrollment data
from other comprehensive universities with similar programs;
(f) Estimating funding available from state,
federal, other non-state, tuition, and institutional allocations and
reallocations; and
(g) Estimating
costs associated with faculty, student employees, graduate assistants, and
professional staff; equipment and instructional materials; library materials;
contractual services; academic and student support services; other support
services; faculty professional development; student space and equipment;
faculty space and equipment; and miscellaneous expenses.
(5) In submitting the Pre-Proposal for a New
Academic Program required by Section 3(1) of this administrative regulation and
the Proposal for a New Doctoral Program required by Section 3(5) of this
administrative regulation, a comprehensive university shall demonstrate program
evaluation procedures by:
(a) Identifying what
program components will be evaluated;
(b) Explaining when and how the components
will be evaluated;
(c) Identifying
who is responsible for the data collection;
(d) Explaining how the data will be shared
with faculty;
(e) Explaining how
the data will be used for program improvement;
(f) Identifying measures of teaching
effectiveness; and
(g) Identifying
plans to assess students' post-graduation success.
Section 3. New Advanced Practice
Program Application Procedures.
(1) A
comprehensive university shall submit the Pre-Proposal for a New Academic
Program to the online Kentucky Postsecondary Program Proposal System (KPPPS)
after the pre-proposal has been approved by the appropriate college within the
comprehensive university.
(2) After
this information is posted to KPPPS, the chief academic officers, or their
designees, of the postsecondary education system and council staff shall have
thirty (30) days to review and comment on the proposed program. The thirty (30)
day time period shall begin on the date that the pre-proposal is
submitted.
(3) If another
institution or the council staff expresses concerns about the proposed program,
the council staff may require additional relevant information and may request
review by the chief academic officers of the postsecondary education system. If
additional information is requested, the proposing institution shall submit
that information within thirty (30) days of the request.
(4) Once all concerns have been addressed,
the council staff shall notify the comprehensive university that:
(a) The advanced practice doctoral degree
program proposed for that comprehensive university has been pre-approved;
and
(b) The comprehensive
university may continue the process for developing the program.
(5) The comprehensive university
shall submit a Proposal for a New Doctoral Program, which has been approved by
the institutional governing board, to the council within six (6) months of the
council staff's pre-approval.
(6)
Upon receipt of the Proposal for a New Doctoral Program, council staff shall
review the proposal. If council staff determines that the comprehensive
university has met all the requirements established in Section 2 of this
administrative regulation, staff shall recommend the proposal to the council
for approval.
(7) Upon staff
recommendation, at its first subsequent meeting after completion of the
proposal process, the council shall either:
(a) Approve the proposal; or
(b) Deny the proposal and identify
deficiencies in the proposal that shall be corrected by the comprehensive
university by submitting a revised proposal to council staff within ninety (90)
working days.
Section
4. Incorporation by Reference.
(1) The following material is incorporated by
reference:
(a) "Kentucky Postsecondary Program
Proposal System", November 2011;
(b) "Pre-Proposal for a New Academic
Program", November 2011; and
(c)
"Proposal for a New Doctoral Program", November 2011.
(2) This material may be inspected, copied,
or obtained, subject to applicable copyright law, at the Kentucky Council on
Postsecondary Education, 1024 Capital Center Drive, Suite 320, Frankfort,
Kentucky 40601, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.