La. Admin. Code tit. 34, § V-527 - Bid Evaluation and Award [Formerly LAC 34:I.527]

A. General. The contract is to be awarded "to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder whose bid meets the requirements and criteria set forth in the invitation for bids." See R.S. 39:1594(G)(Competitive Sealed Bidding, Award) of the Louisiana Procurement Code. The invitation for bidsshall set forth the requirements and criteria which will be used to determine the lowest responsive bidder. No bid shall be evaluated for any requirements or criteria that are not disclosed in the invitation for bids.
B. Responsibility and Responsiveness

Responsive Bidder-a person who has submitted a bid under R.S. 39:1594 which conforms in all substantive respects to the invitation for bids including the specifications set forth in the invitation.

Responsible Bidder or Offeror-a person who has the capability in all respects to perform the contract requirements and the integrity and reliability which will assure good faith performance.

C. Product Acceptability
1. The invitation for bids shall set forth the evaluation criteria to be used in determining product acceptability. It may require the submission of bid samples, descriptive literature, technical data, or other material. It may also provide for:
a. inspection or testing of a product prior to award for such characteristics as quality or workmanship;
b. examination of such elements as appearance, finish, taste, or feel; or
c. other examinations to determine whether the product conforms with any other purchase description requirements, such as unit packaging. If bidder changes the unit or packaging, and it is determined that the change prejudices other bidders, then the bid for the changed item shall be rejected.
2. The acceptability evaluation is not conducted for the purpose of determining whether one bidder's item is superior to another but only to determine that a bidder's offering is acceptable as set forth in the invitation for bids. Any bidder's offering which does not meet the acceptability requirements shall be rejected.
D. Determination of Lowest Bidder
1. Following determination of product acceptability as set forth in Subsection C of this Section, if any is required, bids will be evaluated to determine which bidder offers the lowest cost to the state in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in the invitation for bids. Only objectively measurable criteria which are set forth in the invitation for bids shall be applied in determining the lowest bidder. Examples of such criteria include but are not limited to transportation cost, and ownership or life-cycle cost formula. Evaluation factors need not be precise predictors of actual future costs, but to the extent possible, such evaluation factors shall:
a. be reasonable estimates based upon information the state has available concerning future use; and
b. treat all bids equitably.
E. Restrictions. A contract may not be awarded to a bidder submitting a higher quality item than that required by the invitation for bids unless the bid is also the lowest bid as determined under Subsection D of this Section. Further, this Section does not permit negotiation with any bidder.

Notes

La. Admin. Code tit. 34, § V-527
Promulgated by the Office of the Governor, Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing, LR 8:330 (July 1982), amended LR 21:566 (June 1995), repromulgated LR 40:1352 (July 2014).
AUTHORITY NOTE: Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 39:1581.

State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.


No prior version found.