310 CMR, § 42.07 - Criteria for Certification
(1)
Proficiency Testing. Satisfactory performance in the
proficiency testing program is accomplished when the analytes in a category are
correctly identified and acceptably quantified. Criteria for acceptability
shall be set by the Department for each analyte in each discipline and
category. Continued unsatisfactory performance in the analysis of an analyte
within a category may result in revocation of certification for that
analyte.
(2)
Inspections.
(a) The
Department may conduct an inspection of each laboratory to determine whether or
not the laboratory meets the Department's standards for performing analyses in
the matrices, disciplines, and categories for which certification is sought or
is obtained.
(b) The Department
shall consider the following factors in determining whether to certify or
continue certification of a laboratory:
1.
Education and experience of laboratory personnel;
2. Adequacy of laboratory facilities and
equipment;
3. Adherence to
Department-approved methodology and quality assurance/quality control
procedures;
4. Adherence to
Department-approved methods of handling and reporting data;
5. Adequacy of safety equipment and training;
and
6. Any other factors the
Department deems relevant to the determination of the ability of a laboratory
to operate in a professional manner.
(c) If the Department issues a report of
deficiencies found during an inspection of a laboratory, the laboratory shall
have 90 days from the date of issuance of the report to take the necessary
corrective actions specified in the report and submit documentation of such
corrective action to the Department.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.