555 CMR, § 9.09 - Conditional Certification
(1)
If the Division determines that an applicant has not satisfied any
certification standard set forth in
555
CMR 9.08(2), the Division
may conditionally certify the applicant where:
(a) The applicant has been unable to meet
such a certification standard solely due to circumstances that are beyond the
applicant's control and that are attributable to a current or former employer
of the applicant, to the MPTC, or to the Commission; and
(b) A conditional certification is warranted
by other appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, where:
1. The application is substantially complete
and does not reveal any basis for denying certification, but certain additional
details need to be supplied or certain information needs to be
verified;
2. The applicant has been
unable to satisfy a certification standard because the applicant was on
approved leave during the relevant time or because of another valid
reason;
3. The applicant has
experienced a demonstrable hardship which has interfered directly with the
applicant's ability to meet a certification standard; or
4. The applicant has taken all required steps
in connection with the certification process, but circumstances beyond the
applicant's control have delayed a final decision on the application.
(2) If the Division
determines that an applicant has satisfied all certification standards set
forth in
555
CMR 9.08(2), the Division
may nevertheless conditionally certify the applicant where it deems a
conditional certification warranted, pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6E, §§
3(a) and 4.
(3) Where the Division
conditionally certifies an applicant pursuant to
555
CMR 9.09(1) or (2), it shall
set appropriate conditions that must be met in order for the applicant to
maintain a certification.
(4) In
any case, the Division may attach to an applicant's certification any
limitations or restrictions that it deems warranted, pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6E,
§§ 3(a) and 4.
(5) Where
an applicant is conditionally certified:
(a)
If the applicant was certified at the time of applying and is lawfully serving
as a law enforcement officer with a law enforcement agency when the application
is granted, the Division shall stipulate that the applicant need not satisfy
any condition attached to a conditional recertification, and that no time
periods associated with any such condition will begin to elapse, before the
conclusion of any review or hearing, or the expiration of the time afforded for
the officer to seek such review or hearing, pursuant to
555
CMR 9.11; and
(b) In other instances, the Division may, in
its discretion, so stipulate.
(6) When an applicant fails to satisfy a
condition of a conditional certification within the time allowed, taking into
account the provisions of
555
CMR 9.09(5), the Division
shall terminate the applicant's certification, unless good cause for an
extension of time for the applicant to satisfy the condition has been
shown.
(7) When an applicant
satisfies all conditions of a conditional certification within the time
allowed, taking into account the provisions of
555
CMR 9.09(5), and the
Commission has not otherwise limited, restricted, or suspended the applicant's
certification, the Division shall convert the conditional certification into a
full certification with an expiration date of three calendar years from the
date of issuance of the conditional certification under
555
CMR 9.12(2).
(8) An applicant's failure to act in
accordance with a limitation or restriction on a certification may constitute
grounds for disciplinary action pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6E, §§ 3(a),
4(f)(4), 8, 9, and/or 10.
(9) In
all other respects, an individual who holds a conditional, limited, or
restricted certification is "certified," as that term is used in M.G.L. c.
6E.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.