9 Miss. Code. R. § 6-IV - Accountability/Performance

(a) Fiscal Accountability The MCCB maintains fiscal accountability in two ways: (1) by setting project writing and expenditure policies for colleges to follow and (2) by conducting an annual monitoring visit to each college. FY2013 project writing and expenditure policies are included here as Appendix C. Fiscal monitoring visits consist of a review of a random sample of approximately 10% of a college's projects for the previous year. A variety of checks and balances is referenced, including but not limited to comparing the training plan to the class roll sheets, comparing reimbursement requests to invoices and instructor time sheets, reviewing instructional quality checklists and reviewing the notes on instruction as monitored by the center staff. The MCCB reserves the right to conduct 100% monitoring visits and the right to monitor any ongoing activities at any time. In the event that discrepancies are found, appropriate corrective action is taken and the college is provided technical assistance as needed. A copy of the monitoring instrument for FY2013 projects is provided as Appendix D.
(b) Programmatic Performance In FY2013, the MCCB will continue to have available performance information such as number of employees and employers being served, type and quantity of training course, and other information that can be determined from the project database. The robust performance system will continue to be used. See below:
1. the development of a common dataset,
2. electronic collection and storage of data, preferably in the local colleges existing student information system,
3. electronic systems be able to export information through data files to other entities,
4. data files are to be used for the purposes of transcripting non-credit activities, MCCB non-credit enrollment management, and for use in determining performance on SWIB/MCCB jointly approved performance measures, and

In order to facilitate the move to this performance measurement system, the MCCB in conjunction with the college and other partners define the following three file structures as the required common dataset that must be maintained for each training activity.

Data File Student
Data Element Description
Last Name Student's Last Name
First Name Student's First Name
SSN Student's 9 digit Social Security Number
DOB Student's Date of Birth
Race/Ethnicity Student's Race and/or Ethnicity
Gender Student's Gender
Level of Education Highest Level of Education Completed
Employment Status Employed or Unemployed
Employment Type Part Time, Full time, Temporary, Seasonal
Occupation Job Title
Address Street Address
City City
State State
Zip Zip Code
County County of Residence
Term College Term/Semester
Course Number Unique course Identification Number

Data File -- Course
Data Element Description
Term College Term/Semester
Course Number Unique Course Identification Number
Course Title Name of Course
Code MCCB Classification Code for Course
Start Date Month/Day/Year that course begins
End Date Month/Day/Year that course ends
Hours Length of Course/Training in Hours
Day Days of the week course is offered
Credit Number of College Credits
Company Name Name of Company
Company Federal Identification Number Federal Identification Number
Company MDES Account Number MDES Account Number (state tax id)
Campus Location where course is offered
Instructor Name Name of Course Instructor
Costs Amounts of Funding in Dollars

Data File -- Industry Based Training
Data Element Description
Term College Term/Semester
Project Number Unique Project Identification Number
Project Amounts (costs) Amount, in dollars, obligated for project
Funding Source Source of Funding for Course
Reimbursed Amount Actual Dollar Amount Reimbursed
De-obligated Amount Amount in dollars, de-obligated for project
Course Number Unique Course Identification Number
Course Title Name of Course
Code MCCB Classification Code for Course
Start Date Month/Day/Year that course begins
End Date Month/Day/Year that course ends
Hours Length of Course/Training in Hours
Day Days of the week course is offered
Credit Number of College Credits
Company Name Name of Company
Company Federal Identification Number Federal Identification Number
Company MDES Account Number MDES Account Number

The above dataset when managed properly and with the added ability to make comparisons to Mississippi's UI database will provide the information necessary to determine performance on a set of common measures as developed by the SWIB and MCCB. Additionally, there exists a host of other questions that may be of interest to the local college that can be answered by the above data set. Individual colleges are encouraged to review the data reports for locally valuable information. The common measures to be determined for each college and subsequently compiled for the state shall include those approved by the SWIB and MCCB. The measures are as follows:

1. Entered Employment This measure will determine if people who receive services gain employment. This measure is only applied to those participants who are not employed at the date of participation. It is calculated by dividing the number of participants who are employed in the first quarter after the exit quarter by the number of participants who exit during the quarter.
2. Employment Retention This measure will determine if people retain their jobs. This measure will only be applied to those who are employed in the first quarter after the exit quarter. It is calculated by dividing the number of participants who are employed in both the second and third quarters after the exit quarter by the number of participants who exit during the quarter.
3. Average Earnings - This measure will determine if the population served is inclusive. This measure would only be applied to those participants who are employed in the first, second, and third quarters after exit. It is calculated by adding total earnings in the second quarter with total earnings in the third quarter after the exit quarter and dividing by the number of participants who exit during the quarter.
4. Earnings Gains - This measure will determine if people are getting better jobs or higher pay. This measure would be applied to two separate groups. The first group is those who are unemployed at the time of training who then become employed at exit and remain employed in the second and third quarters after exit. For this group, earnings gains are calculated as the average earnings in the third quarter after exit. The second group is those who are employed at the time of participation and who are subsequently employed in the first, second and third quarters after exit. For this group, earnings gains are calculated by comparing the wage at time of participation with the wage at the third quarter after exit.
5. Business Penetration - This measure will determine the total number of businesses served in a given area under specific jurisdictions (e.g., WIA areas, Community College districts, etc.). This measure is calculated by dividing the number of businesses served in the area by the total number of businesses in operation in the area. This proposed measure could be further refined by industry and/or business size.
6. Hiring Activities - This measure will determine employee turnover, business expansion, and lay-offs. Employee turnover will determine at what rate people who receive training change jobs. This measure applies to those who received any form of workforce training. It is calculated as the average number of people who change employers anytime during the first three quarters after exit. The business expansions measure is being proposed to capture whether or not any form of training activities contribute to the expansion of business through the creation of new jobs. This measure is calculated as the difference between the number of people on the payroll in the quarter prior to receiving service and the number of people on the payroll during the first three quarters after a business uses workforce services. The lay-off measure is being proposed to determine if workforce services facilitate businesses to retain their employees by making the business more competitive. This measure is calculated as the average number of people laid-off in the first three quarters after the business receives training services.
(c) Compliance Failure to maintain the common dataset for a training project will result in no reimbursement for that project.

Notes

9 Miss. Code. R. § 6-IV

State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.