N.H. Admin. Code § Rev 1611.01 - Substantial Understatement of Tax
(a) The department
shall assess the penalty for understatement of tax provided by
RSA
21-J:33-a on returns where the understatement
exceeds the greater of 10% of the correct tax liability or $5,000 unless the
retailer or customer meets the exceptions provided in
RSA
21-J:33-a, IV(a) and
(b).
(b) The exception as provided in
RSA
21-J:33-a, IV(b) shall occur
when a retailer or customer has adequately disclosed the tax treatment of an
item on the return or in a statement attached to the front of the return and
all of the following criteria are met:
(1)
The statement contains a prominent caption identifying the statement as a
disclosure of the tax treatment for the penalty for understatement of tax on
return where the understatement exceeds the greater of 10% of the correct tax
liability or $5,000;
(2) The item
for which the disclosure is made is clearly identified;
(3) The dollar amount of the item is
disclosed; and
(4) The statement
contains those facts affecting the tax treatment of the item that reasonably
will apprise the department of the nature of the potential controversy or a
concise description of the legal issues presented by the facts in
question.
(c) In
determining whether a retailer or customer has substantial authority, as stated
in RSA
21-J:33-a, IV(a), the
department shall consider the following as being authoritative sources, which
shall be considered in the following order of review, based on the relevance of
the source, the similarity of the facts, and the precedential value of the
source compared to the matters at issue:
(1)
United States and New Hampshire supreme court decisions;
(2) Communications services tax law and any
other New Hampshire statutes that have a bearing on the tax statutes;
(3) Rules issued by the department;
(4) Declaratory rulings requested by and
issued to the retailer or customer;
(5) Technical information releases issued by
the department;
(6) Superior court
and board of tax and land appeals decisions;
(7) Federal District Court and First Circuit
Court of Appeals decisions;
(8)
Legislative committee reports specifying legislative intent; and
(9) Written advice from the department issued
to the retailer or customer about the tax treatment of the item in
question.
(d) In
addition to (c) above, a retailer or customer shall have substantial authority
for the tax treatment of an item only if the authoritative sources supporting
the retailer or customer's position outweighs the authoritative sources
supporting the department's position on the tax treatment of the same
item.
(e) The following shall not
be considered authoritative sources:
(1)
Opinions reached by tax professionals;
(2) Tax publication opinions or narrative
statements; and
(3) Articles
contained in any professional or tax periodicals.
(f) The existence of substantial authority
for a particular item shall be determined as of the date the return containing
the item was filed or as of the last day of the period to which the return
relates.
(g) The penalty shall be
applied to the net understatement determined by reducing the understatement as
defined in RSA
21-J:33-a, III by the
portion of the understatement for which the retailer or customer had
substantial authority or had adequately disclosed the position taken on the
return.
Notes
#6336, eff 9-24-96; ss by #8178, eff 9-24-04; ss by #10213, eff 10-24-12
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.