N.H. Admin. Code § Site 301.05 - Effects on Aesthetics
(a) Each
application shall include a visual impact assessment of the proposed energy
facility, prepared in a manner consistent with generally accepted professional
standards by a professional trained or having experience in visual impact
assessment procedures, regarding the effects of, and plans for avoiding,
minimizing, or mitigating potential adverse effects of, the proposed facility
on aesthetics.
(b) The visual
impact assessment shall contain the following components:
(1) A description and map depicting the
locations of the proposed facility and all associated buildings, structures,
roads, and other ancillary components, and all areas to be cleared and graded,
that would be visible from any scenic resources, based on both bare ground
conditions using topographic screening only and with consideration of screening
by vegetation or other factors;
(2)
A description of how the applicant identified and evaluated the scenic quality
of the landscape and potential visual impacts;
(3) A narrative and graphic description,
including maps and photographs, of the physiographic, historical and cultural
features of the landscape surrounding the proposed facility to provide the
context for evaluating any visual impacts;
(4) A computer-based visibility analysis to
determine the area of potential visual impact, which, for proposed:
a. Wind energy systems shall extend to a
minimum of a 10-mile radius from each wind turbine in the proposed
facility;
b. Electric transmission
lines longer than 1 mile shall extend to a 1/2 mile radius if located
within any urbanized area;
c.
Electric transmission lines longer than 1 mile shall extend to a 2 mile radius
if located within any urban cluster;
d. Electric transmission lines longer than 1
mile if located within any rural area shall extend to:
1. A radius of 3 miles if the line would be
located within an existing transmission corridor and neither the width of the
corridor nor the height of any towers, poles, or other supporting structures
would be increased; or
2. A radius
of 10 miles if the line would be located in a new transmission corridor or in
an existing transmission corridor if either or both the width of the corridor
or the height of the towers, poles, or other supporting structures would be
increased;
(5) An identification of all scenic resources
within the area of potential visual impact and a description of those scenic
resources from which the proposed facility would be visible;
(6) A characterization of the potential
visual impacts of the proposed facility, and of any visible plume that would
emanate from the proposed facility, on identified scenic resources as high,
medium, or low, based on consideration of the following factors:
a. The expectations of the typical
viewer;
b. The effect on future use
and enjoyment of the scenic resource;
c. The extent of the proposed facility,
including all structures and disturbed areas, visible from the scenic
resource;
d. The distance of the
proposed facility from the scenic resource;
e. The horizontal breadth or visual arc of
the visible elements of the proposed facility;
f. The scale, elevation, and nature of the
proposed facility relative to surrounding topography and existing
structures;
g. The duration and
direction of the typical view of elements of the proposed facility;
and
h. The presence of intervening
topography between the scenic resource and elements of the proposed
facility;
(7)
Photosimulations from representative key observation points, from other scenic
resources for which the potential visual impacts are characterized as "high"
pursuant to (6) above, and, to the extent feasible, from a sample of private
property observation points within the area of potential visual impact, to
illustrate the potential change in the landscape that would result from
construction of the proposed facility and associated infrastructure, including
land clearing and grading and road construction, and from any visible plume
that would emanate from the proposed facility;
(8) Photosimulations shall meet the following
additional requirements:
a. Photographs used
in the simulation shall be taken at high resolution and contrast, using a full
frame digital camera with a 50 millimeter fixed focal length lens or digital
equivalent that creates an angle of view that closely matches human visual
perception, under clear weather conditions and at a time of day that provides
optimal clarity and contrast, and shall avoid if feasible showing any utility
poles, fences, walls, trees, shrubs, foliage, and other foreground objects and
obstructions;
b. Photosimulations
shall be printed at high resolution at 15.3 inches by10.2 inches, or 390
millimeters by 260 millimeters;
c.
At least one set of photosimulations shall represent winter season conditions
without the presence of foliage typical of other seasons;
d. Field conditions in which a viewpoint is
photographed shall be recorded including:
1.
Global Position System (GPS) location points with an accuracy of at least 3
meters for each simulation viewpoint to ensure repeatability;
2. Camera make and model and lens focal
length;
3. All camera settings at
the time the photograph is taken; and
4. Date, time and weather conditions at the
time the photograph is taken; and
e. When simulating the presence of proposed
wind turbines, the following shall apply:
1.
Turbines shall be placed with full frontal views and no haze or fog effect
applied;
2. Turbines shall
reasonably represent the shape of the intended turbines for a project including
the correct hub height and rotor diameter;
3. Turbine blades shall be set at random
angles with some turbines showing a blade in the 12 o'clock position;
and
4. The lighting model used to
render wind turbine elements shall correspond to the lighting visible in the
base photograph;
(9) If the proposed facility is required by
Federal Aviation Administration regulations to install aircraft warning
lighting or if the proposed facility would include other nighttime lighting, a
description and characterization of the potential visual impacts of this
lighting, including the number of lights visible and their distance from key
observation points; and
(10) A
description of the measures planned to avoid, minimize, or mitigate potential
adverse effects of the proposed facility, and of any visible plume that would
emanate from the proposed facility, and the alternative measures considered but
rejected by the applicant.
Notes
#9183-B, eff 6-17-08
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.