21 N.C. Admin. Code 42L .0104 - COMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS
(a)
Upon receipt of a written complaint alleging misconduct that might subject a
licensee or other person to discipline, or upon notice of such otherwise coming
to the Board's attention through investigatory means, the Board may investigate
such matter to determine whether probable cause exists to institute formal
disciplinary proceedings.
(b) The
President shall appoint one member from the Board to serve with the Executive
Director of the Board as the probable cause or investigatory committee. The
probable cause committee may be assisted by any attorney retained by the Board
for the purpose of such investigation, or any investigator retained by the
Board.
(c) The probable cause
committee shall investigate the complaint referred to it by the Board. The
committee shall determine whether or not there is probable cause to believe
that the licensee has violated any statute or board rule which would justify a
disciplinary hearing. If the committee determines that such probable cause
exists, the committee may confer with the licensee in an attempt to settle the
matter through informal means. If the committee and the licensee reach an
agreement on the disposition of the matter under investigation, the committee
may cause to be drafted a proposed settlement agreement, which may include
proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a consent order, for
presentation to and consideration by the Board. Such settlement agreement shall
be presented to and approved by the licensee before they are presented to the
Board for consideration and approval.
(d) If the probable cause committee and the
licensee are not able to settle the matter under investigation by informal
means, the licensee may request an administrative hearing pursuant to Rule
.0002 of this Section or the Board may give notice of a disciplinary or
contested case hearing, if required.
(e) Any Board member who has been appointed
to a probable cause committee shall not be assigned to make a decision or to
make findings of fact and conclusions of law in any administrative hearing
concerning the particular matter on which he served on the probable cause
committee. Such Board member may be called as a witness and may give testimony
at any administrative hearing resulting from such investigation.
(f) Subsequent to the issuance of a notice of
hearing, the attorney prosecuting the contested case for the Board may not
communicate, directly or indirectly, in connection with any issue of fact of
question of law, with any party or his representative, including the members of
the Board assigned to make a decision or to make findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the contested case, except on notice and opportunity for
all parties to participate. However, the attorney prosecuting the matter for
the Board may continue to communicate concerning such contested case with the
members of the probable cause committee who investigated such matter, and he
may communicate with persons not parties to the contested case who may be
called as witnesses, including the person who filed the complaint against the
optometrist. He also may communicate with the Board members about other
matters.
Notes
Eff. April 1, 1993;
Pursuant to G.S. 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without substantive public interest Eff. May 23, 2015.
Eff. April 1, 1993.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.