Reports. The following information shall
be presented in narrative form in a report with a table of contents and divided
and labeled according to paragraphs (C)(1) to (C)(10) of this rule.
(3) Site investigation. A
hydrogeologic and geotechnical site investigation report, which shall include
at a minimum the following:
(a) Sufficient
information to allow the director to determine the suitability of the site for
solid waste disposal through the following:
(i) Identification and characterization of
the hydrogeology of the uppermost aquifer system and stratigraphic units that
exist above the uppermost aquifer system.
(ii) Characterization of the site geology and
hydrogeology to allow for the evaluation of the proposed design of the sanitary
landfill facility and to ensure that it will be in compliance with the
requirements of rules
3745-27-07 and
3745-27-10 of the Administrative
Code.
[Comment: The narrative portion of the hydrogeologic and
geotechnical report focuses on the siting and ground water monitoring issues.
The subsurface investigation portion of the report also addresses geotechnical
and design issues.]
(b) A description, based on publicly
available information, of the regional geology and hydrogeology within one mile
of the proposed sanitary landfill facility. At a minimum, the description shall
include the following:
[Comment: Publicly available information regarding unstable
areas is placed in a separate section located in the geotechnical analysis in
paragraph (C)(4) of this rule.]
(i)
The identification and average yield of the regional aquifer system.
(ii) The direction of ground water flow in
the regional aquifer system.
(iii)
The identification of recharge and discharge areas of the regional aquifer
system.
(iv) Regional stratigraphy,
including any regional stratigraphic or structural features, such as the
bedrock surface, bedrock dip, or joint systems, that may influence the ground
water flow system.
(v) A
description of the regional geomorphology, including the location of surface
water bodies, floodplains, and a description of any topographic features that
may influence the ground water flow system.
(c) The following documents:
(i) If any surface or underground mines were
identified in accordance with paragraph (B)(2)(b)(ix) of this rule, a letter
from the Ohio department of natural resources, division of mineral resources
management or other appropriate agency verifying the type, mining method,
location, depth, and status of the mine.
(ii) Documentation of who owns the mineral
rights below the sanitary landfill facility.
(iii) If any oil or gas wells were identified
in accordance with paragraph (B)(2)(b)(ix) of this rule, a letter from the Ohio
department of natural resources or other appropriate agency verifying the type,
location, depth, and status of the well.
(iv) A letter from the United States army
corps of engineers agreeing with the wetland delineation, depicted on the plan
drawing with the information pursuant to paragraph (B)(2)(a)(iv) of this rule,
including confirmation of any isolated wetlands or if no wetlands are
present.
(d) A detailed
description and analysis of the geology and hydrogeology under the proposed
sanitary landfill facility. This description shall be based on data collected
using appropriate subsurface investigatory methods such as borings,
piezometers, monitoring wells, tensiometers, geophysical surveys, soil gas
surveys, dutch cone penetrometers, and test pits. At a minimum, the description
and analysis shall include the following:
[Comment: This information may also be used in the geotechnical
analysis pursuant to paragraph (C)(4) of this rule.]
(i) The consolidated and unconsolidated
stratigraphic units from the ground surface down to the base of the uppermost
aquifer system including the following:
(a)
The following characteristics, composition, and features:
(i) For unconsolidated stratigraphic units,
the textural classification in accordance with ASTM D2487.
(ii) For consolidated stratigraphic units,
the rock type such as limestone, dolomite, coal, shale, siltstone, or
sandstone.
(iii) Color.
(iv) Moisture content.
(v) Stratigraphic features such as layering,
interbedding, or weathering.
(vi)
Structural features such as fracturing or jointing.
(vii) Visible accessory minerals such as
pyrite, calcite, or gypsum.
(viii)
Hydraulic conductivity.
(b) Thickness.
(c) Lateral extent.
(d) Depth and elevation.
(e) Variations in texture, saturation,
stratigraphy, structure, or mineralogy exhibited by each stratigraphic unit
that could influence the ground water flow or quality in the uppermost aquifer
system or any overlying zones of saturation.
(ii) The local geomorphology at the proposed
sanitary landfill facility including surface water bodies or topographic
features that may influence the ground water flow in the uppermost aquifer
system or any overlying significant zones of saturation.
(iii) Any local structural geology features
under the proposed sanitary landfill facility that may influence the ground
water flow in the uppermost aquifer system or any overlying significant zones
of saturation.
(iv) The uppermost
aquifer system and significant zones of saturation above the uppermost aquifer
system. This description shall include the depth to, and lateral and vertical
extent of, the uppermost aquifer system and significant zones of saturation
above the uppermost aquifer system. This description and analysis shall include
but not be limited to the following:
(a)
Temporal fluctuations in ground water levels over a period of time to determine
the seasonal effects on ground water flow directions.
(b) An interpretation of the ground water
flow system including hydraulic conductivity, rate of flow, direction of flow,
vertical and lateral components of flow, and interconnections between and
within the uppermost aquifer system and any significant zones of saturation
above the uppermost aquifer system. This interpretation shall be described in
both narrative and map form.
(c)
Identification and characterization of recharge and discharge areas within the
boundaries of the proposed sanitary landfill facility. This shall include any
relationships of ground water with seeps, springs, streams, and other surface
water features.
(d) Yield of any
significant zones of saturation and of the uppermost aquifer system.
(v) If the applicant chooses, a
site specific justification based on evidence gathered in accordance with
paragraph (C)(3)(b) of this rule, that an unconsolidated aquifer system capable
of sustaining a yield of one hundred gallons per minute for a twenty-four-hour
period is not located beneath the facility.
(e) A description and quantification of the
ground water quality of the uppermost aquifer system and significant zones of
saturation above the uppermost aquifer system. The description and
quantification of ground water quality shall describe and quantify the rate,
extent, and concentration of any ground water contamination located under the
facility.
(f) Subsurface
investigation information used to prepare the site investigation report
narrative in accordance with paragraphs (C)(3)(b), (C)(3)(d) and (C)(3)(e) of
this rule and the geotechnical analyses in accordance with paragraph (C)(4) of
this rule. The submitted information shall be adequate to satisfy the
performance standards of paragraphs (C)(3)(a) and (C)(4) of this rule. At a
minimum, the information shall include the following:
[Comment: The narrative portion of the hydrogeologic and
geotechnical report focuses on the siting and ground water monitoring issues.
The subsurface investigation portion of the report also addresses geotechnical
and design issues.]
(i) Publicly
available information collected and used to prepare the site investigation
report narrative in accordance with paragraph (C)(3)(b) of this rule and the
plan sheets in accordance with paragraph (B)(2) of this rule. At a minimum,
publicly available information includes the following:
(a) Well logs and, where applicable, the
decommissioning records for public and private water supply wells within one
mile of the proposed sanitary landfill facility.
(b) The Ohio department of natural resources
county ground water resource maps or other appropriate regional hydrogeological
data.
(c) Other publicly available
information.
(ii)
Information collected at the site for each stratigraphic unit from the surface
to the bottom of the uppermost aquifer system or to one hundred and fifty feet
below the proposed composite liner system, whichever is shallower. The
information shall be used to prepare the site investigation report narrative in
accordance with paragraph (C)(3)(d) of this rule. This information shall be
presented on logs appropriate for the subsurface investigatory method used. At
a minimum, the information shall include the following:
[Comment: The subsurface investigation conducted to provide the
information pursuant to this paragraph may be combined with the subsurface
investigation conducted to provide the information pursuant to paragraph
(C)(3)(f)(v) of this rule.]
(a) The
northing and easting location coordinates of the subsurface investigation
site.
(b) Surface elevation
surveyed to the nearest tenth of a foot.
(c) Depth interval for each stratigraphic
unit.
(d) Field descriptions of the
consolidated and unconsolidated units. At a minimum, the information shall
include the following:
(i) Textural
classification for each unconsolidated stratigraphic unit in accordance with
ASTM D2487.
(ii) Color.
(iii) Moisture content.
(iv) Stratigraphic features such as layering,
interbedding, or weathering.
(v)
Structural features such as fracturing or jointing.
(vi) Visible accessory minerals such as
pyrite, calcite, or gypsum.
(vii)
Rock type such as limestone, dolomite, coal, shale, siltstone or
sandstone.
(viii)
Thickness.
(ix) Variations in
texture, saturation, stratigraphy, structure or mineralogy in each
stratigraphic unit.
(e)
Depth to saturation.
(f) Hydraulic
conductivity, including the following:
(i) For
saturated unconsolidated stratigraphic units, at least one field measurement of
hydraulic conductivity per saturated unconsolidated unit and one additional
measurement per saturated unconsolidated unit for each twenty acres.
(ii) For unconsolidated stratigraphic units,
from which an undisturbed sample can be collected, at least one laboratory
measurement of vertical hydraulic conductivity per unconsolidated unit and one
additional measurement per unconsolidated unit for each twenty acres.
(iii) For saturated consolidated
stratigraphic units, at least one field measurement of hydraulic conductivity
per saturated consolidated unit and one additional measurement per saturated
consolidated unit for each twenty acres.
[Comment: Most field methods for measuring hydraulic
conductivity primarily evaluate lateral hydraulic conductivity, but also
account for at least some effects of vertical hydraulic conductivity over the
tested interval. In cases where laboratory measurements of vertical hydraulic
conductivity are obtained for unconsolidated saturated units which are wholly
or partially saturated, the vertical hydraulic conductivity should be compared
to the field hydraulic conductivity to help evaluate the extent to which
near-vertical fractures may be contributing to ground water flow through the
unit. Hydraulic conductivity data should be interpreted with respect to the
primary and secondary porosity features that are observed or are reasonably
expected to occur in the investigated units, as well as the stratigraphic and
structural features of the investigated units.]
(g) Yield of any significant zones of
saturation and of the uppermost aquifer.
(h) If an unconsolidated aquifer system
capable of sustaining a yield of one hundred gallons per minute for a
twenty-four-hour period is suspected beneath the facility based on evidence
gathered in accordance with paragraph (C)(4)(b) of this rule, and the applicant
proposes to revise that finding, the applicant must provide adequate
site-specific information on the suspected aquifer system to justify any
requested revision including but not limited to the yield of any aquifer
systems below the uppermost aquifer system.
(iii) A construction diagram of each
monitoring well and piezometer. At a minimum, the diagram shall include the
following:
(a) The top-of-casing elevation
used for water level measurement reference surveyed to the nearest hundredth
foot.
(b) The boring diameter and
the inside diameter of the well casing.
(c) The total depth of the boring and the
total depth of the well.
(d) The
screened interval depth and elevation, and the screen slot size.
(e) A description of construction materials
and depth intervals for construction materials.
(iv) Data gathered by sampling and analyzing
the ground water from the uppermost aquifer system and significant zones of
saturation above the uppermost aquifer system. These samples shall at a minimum
be analyzed for compounds 1 to 78 listed in appendix I to rule
3745-27-10 of the Administrative
Code.
(v) Information collected at
the site and used to prepare the geotechnical analysis in accordance with
paragraph (C)(4) of this rule. This information shall be presented on logs
appropriate for the subsurface investigatory method used. The subsurface
investigatory method and frequency must be adequate to find the unconsolidated
stratigraphic units susceptible to bearing capacity failure, static stability
failure, seismic stability failure, or settlement at the site. The information
shall be collected for each unconsolidated stratigraphic unit under the
facility down to fifty feet below the proposed depths of excavation. At a
minimum, the information shall include the following:
[Comment: Ohio EPA recommends a frequency of one subsurface
investigatory site for every four acres on a more or less uniform grid across
the site. However, for sites which are located in areas where landslides or
mass movements of unconsolidated material have occurred, or are underlain by
complex geology with multiple unconsolidated stratigraphic units, more borings
may be necessary pursuant to paragraph (A)(1) of this rule. Sites that are
located in areas with a consistent stratigraphy, which is supported by
comprehensive and reliable information from previous studies, may use a lower
frequency of borings. Ohio EPA recommends against boring through cap, existing
waste, or liner to obtain this information. Other methods or increased borings
around the landfill footprint should be used.]
[Comment: Given the objective of finding thin unconsolidated
stratigraphic units susceptible to bearing capacity failure, static stability
failure, seismic stability failure, or settlement, the unconsolidated
stratigraphic units should be logged continuously, and the subsurface
investigation may also need to go deeper if publicly available data gathered
pursuant to paragraph (C)(4)(h) of this rule or if field data gathered pursuant
to paragraph (C)(3)(d)(i) of this rule indicate that deeper susceptible units
exist.]
[Comment: The subsurface investigation conducted to provide the
information pursuant to this paragraph may be combined with the subsurface
investigation conducted to provide the information pursuant to paragraph
(C)(3)(f)(ii) of this rule.]
(a)
Northing and easting location coordinates.
(b) Surface elevation surveyed to the nearest
tenth of a foot.
(c) Depth interval
for each stratigraphic unit.
(d)
Field descriptions of the unconsolidated units. At a minimum, the information
shall include the following:
(i) Textural
classification for each unconsolidated stratigraphic unit in accordance with
ASTM D2487.
(ii) Color.
(iii) Moisture content.
(iv) Stratigraphic features such as layering,
interbedding, or weathering.
(v)
For fine-grained unconsolidated units, field descriptions of consistency and
plasticity or dilatancy.
(vi)
Thickness.
(vii) Variations in
texture, saturation, stratigraphy, structure, or mineralogy in each
stratigraphic unit.
(e)
Identification of the depth interval of any samples collected including those
submitted for laboratory testing.
(f) Depth to phreatic and piezometric
surfaces.
[Comment: "Phreatic surface" is synonymous with the term "water
table" and "piezometric surface" is synonymous with the term "potentiometric
surface." Hydrogeologic investigations generally use "water table" for a water
level surface in an unconfined saturated unit and "potentiometric surface" for
the pressure head surface associated with a confined saturated unit. In
hydrogeologic applications, the "water table" is considered a special type of
potentiometric surface where the head pressure is equal to atmospheric
pressure.]
[Comment: Any piezometric surfaces associated with bedrock that
may affect the facility during excavation or construction may also be
identified.]
(g) Results
from penetration testing in accordance with ASTM D1586, plus the corrected and
normalized standard penetration number or results from mechanical cone
penetration testing in accordance with ASTM D3441.
(vi) Laboratory analysis on representative
samples of each unconsolidated stratigraphic units under the facility down to a
minimum of fifty feet below the proposed depths of excavation. The information
shall be used to prepare the geotechnical analysis in accordance with paragraph
(C)(4) of this rule. At a minimum, the information shall include the following:
[Comment: Undisturbed samples from at least ten per cent of the
borings passing through each susceptible unit or a minimum of three, whichever
is greater, should be collected to provide representative data.]
(a) Grain size distribution.
(b) Atterberg limits.
(c) Specific gravity.
(d) In situ unit weight.
(e) In situ moisture content.
(f) Dry unit weight.
(g) For unconsolidated stratigraphic units
susceptible to bearing capacity failure, the effective drained or undrained
peak shear strength parameters, as appropriate, in accordance with ASTM D2850,
ASTM D4767, or ASTM D6467.
(h) For
unconsolidated stratigraphic units susceptible to static stability failure or
seismic stability failure, the effective shear strength in accordance with ASTM
D4767 or ASTM D6467.
(i) For
unconsolidated stratigraphic units susceptible to static stability failure or
seismic stability failure due to excessive increase in pore pressures from
construction and operation activities, the undrained shear strength using fully
saturated samples determined in accordance with ASTM D2850.
(j) For unconsolidated stratigraphic units
susceptible to settlement, the following parameters:
(i) The coefficient of
consolidation.
(ii) The over
consolidation ratio.
(iii) The
pre-consolidation pressure.
(iv)
The compression index.
(v) The
swelling index.
(vi) The in situ
void ratio.
(vii) The effective
porosity.
(vii)
Representative samples of each unconsolidated stratigraphic units susceptible
to seepage piping failure be tested in accordance with ASTM D4647. Units
susceptible to seepage piping failure include those located within fifteen feet
of the proposed depths of excavation and those located where the piezometric
surface of an aquifer or a zone of significant saturation is higher than the
depth of excavation.
(viii) Any
other data generated.
(g)
A detailed description of how the subsurface investigation was conducted
including the following:
(i) The subsurface
investigatory and sampling methods used in characterizing the geologic and
hydrogeologic properties of the consolidated and unconsolidated stratigraphic
units at the proposed sanitary landfill facility and an explanation of why the
particular subsurface investigatory method was chosen.
(ii) The analytical procedures and
methodology used to characterize the unconsolidated and consolidated materials
obtained from test pits and borings.
(iii) The methodology, equipment, and
procedures used to define the uppermost aquifer system and significant zones of
saturation above the uppermost aquifer system, including the following:
(a) Well and piezometer construction
specifications.
(b) Water level
measurement.
(iv) The
methodology, equipment, and procedures used to determine the ground water
quality in the uppermost aquifer system and any significant zones of saturation
above the uppermost aquifer system, including the following:
(a) Detection of immiscible layers.
(b) Collection of ground water samples,
including the following:
(i) Well
evacuation.
(ii) Sample
withdrawal.
(iii) Sample containers
and handling.
(iv) Sample
preservation.
(c)
Performance of field analysis, including the following:
(i) Procedures and forms for recording data
and the exact location, time, and facility-specific considerations associated
with the data acquisition.
(ii)
Calibration of field devices.
(d) Decontamination of equipment.
(e) Analysis of ground water
samples.
(f) Chain of custody
control, including the following:
(i)
Standardized field tracking reporting forms to record sample custody in the
field prior to and during shipment.
(ii) Sample labels indicating a unique sample
number, date, time, sample media, sample type, analytical methods, any
preservatives, and any other information necessary for effective sample
tracking.
(g) Field and
laboratory quality assurance and quality control including the following, the
number of which shall be enough to adequately demonstrate the accuracy of the
analysis results:
(i) Collection of duplicate
samples.
(ii) Submission of
field-bias blanks.
(iii) Potential
interferences.
(4) Geotechnical analysis. The following
analyses shall provide sufficient information to allow Ohio EPA to characterize
the facility geology to allow for the evaluation of the proposed design of the
sanitary landfill facility.
(a) The
hydrostatic uplift analysis shall include the following:
(i) The scope, extent, and findings of the
subsurface investigation conducted in accordance with paragraph (C)(3) of this
rule, as it pertains to hydrostatic uplift.
(ii) A narrative description of the rationale
used for the selection of the analysis input parameters.
(iii) A description of the method used to
calculate hydraulic uplift.
(iv) A
description of the assessed failure modes and conditions.
(v) A narrative description of the rationale
used for the selection of the critical cross section that at a minimum shall
consider the worst case intersection of the highest phreatic or piezometric
surface with the maximum excavation depth.
(vi) A plan drawing showing the temporal high
phreatic and piezometric surfaces derived in accordance with paragraph
(B)(3)(c) of this rule and the horizontal and vertical limits of excavation
derived in accordance with paragraph (B)(4)(a) of this rule.
(vii) A profile view of the critical area
that fully depicts the analysis input model including the following:
(a) The material boundaries.
(b) The applicable dimensions, including but
not limited to the depth of excavation, and depth to the temporal high phreatic
and piezometric surfaces.
(c) The
material types.
(d) The in situ
unit weights and saturated unit weights.
(viii) The actual calculations or computer
output.
(b) The bearing
capacity analysis for any vertical sump risers on the composite liner system
shall include the following:
(i) The scope,
extent, and findings of the subsurface investigation conducted in accordance
with paragraph (C)(3) of this rule, as it pertains to bearing
capacity.
(ii) A narrative
description of the rationale used for the selection of the analysis input
parameters.
(iii) A description of
the method used to calculate bearing capacity.
(iv) A description of the assessed failure
modes and conditions.
(v) A profile
view of the critical cross section that fully depicts the analysis input model
including the following:
(a) The material
boundaries.
(b) The temporal high
piezometric surface.
(c) The
material types.
(d) The in situ
unit weights and saturated unit weights.
(vi) The plan view of the critical cross
section including northings and eastings for the endpoints of the
section.
(vii) The actual
calculations or computer output.
(c) The static stability analysis shall
include the following:
(i) The scope, extent,
and findings of the subsurface investigation conducted in accordance with
paragraph (C)(3) of this rule, and earthen materials testing program as it
pertains to static stability.
(ii)
A narrative description of the rationale used for the selection of the analysis
input parameters.
(iii) A
description of the method used to calculate static stability.
(iv) An assessment of failure modes and
conditions that at a minimum should include the following:
(a) Deep-seated translational and rotational
failure mechanisms of internal slopes, interim slopes, and final slopes for
drained conditions and, as applicable, undrained conditions.
(b) Shallow translational and rotational
failure mechanisms of internal slopes and final slopes for saturated conditions
and drained conditions.
(v) For each of the failure modes and
conditions assessed, a narrative description of the rationale used for the
selection of the critical cross sections for the internal slopes, interim
slopes, and final slopes.
(vi) A
profile view of the critical cross sections that fully depicts the analysis
input model including the following:
(a) The
material boundaries.
(b) The
temporal high phreatic and piezometric surfaces.
(c) The material types.
(d) The in situ unit weights and, where
applicable, the in situ saturated unit weights.
(e) The material shear strengths.
(vii) The plan view of the
critical cross sections that includes the northings and eastings for the
endpoints of the sections.
(viii) A
summary of the results using two dimensional limit equilibrium methods or other
methods acceptable to Ohio EPA for each of the critical cross
sections.
(ix) The actual
calculations or computer output.
(d) The seismic stability analysis shall
include the following:
(i) The scope, extent,
and findings of the subsurface investigation conducted in accordance with
paragraph (C)(3) of this rule, and earthen materials testing program as it
pertains to seismic stability.
(ii)
A narrative description of the rationale used for the selection of the analysis
input parameters.
(iii) A
description of the method used to calculate the seismic stability.
(iv) An assessment of failure modes and
conditions that at a minimum include the following:
(a) Deep-seated translational and rotational
failure mechanisms of final slopes for drained conditions.
(b) Deep-seated translational and rotational
failure mechanisms of internal slopes and interim slopes for drained
conditions, if required by Ohio EPA.
(c) Shallow translational and rotational
failure mechanisms of final slopes for drained conditions.
(d) Liquefaction failure mechanisms of
internal slopes, interim slopes, and final slopes.
(v) For each of the failure modes and
conditions, a narrative description of the rationale used for the selection of
the critical cross sections for the internal slopes, interim slopes, and final
slopes.
(vi) The profile views of
the critical cross sections that fully depict the analysis input model
including the following:
(a) The material
boundaries.
(b) The temporal high
phreatic and piezometric surfaces.
(c) The material types.
(d) The in situ unit weights and, where
applicable, the in situ saturated unit weights.
(e) The material shear strengths.
(vii) The plan views of the
critical cross sections that include the northings and eastings for the
endpoints of the sections.
(viii) A
summary of the results using two or three dimensional limit equilibrium methods
or other methods acceptable to Ohio EPA for each of the critical cross
sections.
(ix) The actual
calculations or computer output.
(e) The settlement analyses of the composite
liner system shall include the following:
(i)
The scope, extent, and findings of the subsurface investigation conducted in
accordance with paragraph (C)(3) of this rule, and earthen materials testing
program as it pertains to settlement.
(ii) A narrative description of the rationale
used for the selection of the analysis input parameters.
(iii) A description of the method used to
calculate the settlement.
(iv) A
description of the assessed failure modes and conditions.
(v) A summary of the results.
(vi) The actual calculations of settlement or
computer output.
(f) The
seepage piping failure analyses where the piezometric surface of an underlying
aquifer or zone of saturation is above the in situ foundation, added geologic
material, and recompacted soil liner shall include the following for the
relevant layer:
(i) The scope, extent, and
findings of the subsurface investigation conducted in accordance with paragraph
(C)(3) of this rule pertaining to seepage piping failure through in situ
foundation.
(ii) A narrative
description of the rationale used for the selection of the analysis input
parameters.
(iii) A description of
the method used to calculate likelihood of seepage piping failure through in
situ foundation or added geologic material or recompacted soil liner.
(iv) A description of the assessed failure
modes and conditions.
(v) A
narrative description of the rationale used for the selection of the critical
cross section that at a minimum considers the worst-case intersection of the
highest phreatic or piezometric surface with the maximum excavation
depth.
(vi) A plan drawing showing
the temporal high phreatic and piezometric surfaces derived in accordance with
paragraph (B)(3)(d) of this rule and the horizontal and vertical limits of
excavation derived in accordance with paragraph (B)(4)(a) of this
rule.
(vii) A profile view of the
critical area that fully depicts the analysis input model including the
following:
(a) The material
boundaries.
(b) The applicable
dimensions including but not limited to the depth of excavation, and depth to
the temporal high phreatic and piezometric surfaces.
(c) The material types.
(d) The in situ unit weights and saturated
unit weights.
(viii) The
actual calculations or computer output.
(g) If a separatory liner is used and is
designed with a slope other than that specified by rule
3745-27-08 of the Administrative
Code, the settlement analysis of the separatory liner shall include the
following:
(i) A narrative description of the
rationale used for the selection of the analysis input parameters.
(ii) A description of the method used to
calculate the settlement.
(iii) A
description of the assessed failure modes and conditions.
(iv) A summary of the results.
(v) The actual calculations of settlement or
computer output.
(h) A
description, based on publicly available information, of any of the following
unstable areas within one mile of the limits of solid waste placement. If the
sanitary landfill facility is located in an unstable area, the applicant shall
provide an analysis that the structural components will maintain their
integrity based on the findings of the subsurface investigation conducted in
accordance with paragraph (C)(3) of this rule.
(i) Regional stratigraphic or structural
features that are susceptible to bearing capacity failure, static stability
failure, seismic stability failure, or settlement.
(ii) Areas susceptible to
liquefaction.
(iii) Areas
susceptible to mass movement such as landslides, debris slides and falls, and
rock falls.
(iv) Areas impacted by
natural and human induced activities such as cutting and filling, draw down of
ground water, rapid weathering, heavy rain, seismic activity and
blasting.
(v) Presence of karst
terrain.
(vi) Presence of
underground mining.
(vii) Areas
susceptible to coastal and river erosion.
(5) Calculations. The following design
calculations with references to equations used, showing site-specific input and
assumptions that demonstrate compliance with the design requirements of rule
3745-27-08 of the Administrative
Code:
(a) Calculations showing gross volume of
the sanitary landfill facility in cubic yards, the anticipated life of the
sanitary landfill facility in years, the gross volume of each unit in cubic
yards, and the anticipated life of each unit in years.
(b) If a geotextile cushion layer is
necessary to protect the flexible membrane liner from puncture and excessive
strain due to the force exerted on the granular drainage layers, calculations
for mass per unit area of the geotextile cushion layer accounting for the
weight of the overlying waste mass.
(c) Calculations for leachate head and
flow.
(d) If leachate is to be
recirculated, calculations for amount of leachate to be recirculated and the
leachate head and flow.
(e)
Calculations for sizing any leachate storage tanks based on the volume of
leachate generated after final closure.
(f) Pump size and pipe size calculations
based on paragraphs (C)(5)(c) and (C)(5)(d) of this rule.
(g) Pipe strength and pipe deflection
calculations for the leachate collection and management system.
(h) An itemized written final closure cost
estimate, in current dollars, based on the following:
(i) The cost of final closure of a sanitary
landfill facility in accordance with rule
3745-27-11 of the Administrative
Code.
(ii) A third-party conducting
the final closure activities, assuming payment to employees of not less than
the applicable prevailing wage.
(i) An itemized written post-closure care
cost estimate, in current dollars, based on the following:
(i) The cost of post-closure care of the unit
of the sanitary landfill facility in accordance with rule
3745-27-14 of the Administrative
Code.
(ii) A separate estimate for
each noncontiguous unit of the sanitary landfill facility.
(iii) A third-party conducting the
post-closure care activities, assuming payment to its employees of not less
than the applicable prevailing wage.
(j) Soil erosion calculations.
(k) Calculations for sizing surface water
control structures and verifying that scouring and crushing is
minimized.
(l) Sedimentation basin
calculations.
(m) Other relevant
calculations.
(8)
Operational information. The following statements, which if modified, could
require a permit:
(a) The authorized maximum
daily waste receipt requested for the sanitary landfill facility.
(b) The technique of waste receipt including
but not limited to acceptance of baled waste or loose waste.
(c) The type of waste to be received
including but not limited to municipal solid waste, industrial solid waste,
residual solid waste, asbestos or asbestos containing waste that is subject to
the provisions of NESHAP, 40 CFR Part
61, subpart M
(1984) or construction and demolition
debris.
(d) The type of equipment
to be used to construct, operate, and maintain the sanitary landfill facility.
[Comment: A change in equipment that decreases the capability
of the owner or operator to handle the waste received may be considered to
endanger human health and may require a permit.]
(10) Notifications
and certification. The application shall include the following:
(a) Letters of intent to establish or modify
a sanitary landfill facility, which include a description of property and
facility boundaries, shall be sent via certified mail or any other form of mail
accompanied by a receipt to the following entities (copies of these letters of
intent with copies of the mail receipts shall be included with the
application):
(i) The governments of the
general purpose political subdivisions where the sanitary landfill facility is
located, e.g., county commissioners, legislative authority of a municipal
corporation, or the board of township trustees.
(ii) The single county or joint county solid
waste management district.
(iii)
The owner or lessee of any easement or right-of-way bordering or within the
proposed facility boundaries that may be affected by the proposed sanitary
landfill facility.
(iv) The local
zoning authority having jurisdiction, if any.
(v) The airport administrator and the federal
aviation administration, if the placement of solid waste will occur within five
miles of any airport runway.
(vi)
The park system administrator, if any part of the sanitary landfill facility is
located within or shares the park boundary.
(vii) The conservancy district, if any part
of the sanitary landfill facility is located within or shares the conservancy
district boundary.
(b) A
list of the permits, licenses, plan approvals, authorizations or other
approvals that have been applied for and the local, state, or federal office or
agency where application has been made.
(c) Wetland demonstration. Applications that
propose to locate the sanitary landfill facility in wetlands shall include a
copy of a certification and permit approved in accordance with section 401 and
404 of the "Clean Water Act" or other permit or certification authorizing the
discharge of dredge or fill material under state law.
(d) Proof of property ownership or lease
agreement to use the property as a sanitary landfill facility.