[Comment: For dates of non-regulatory government publications,
publications of recognized organizations and associations, federal rules and
federal statutory provisions referenced in this rule, see rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code.]
(A) Any POTW or
a combination of POTWs operated by the same public authority shall establish,
administer, and enforce a pretreatment program in accordance with 40 C.F.R.
403
and this rule if Ohio EPA does not exercise the option to assume local
responsibilities as the control authority where any of the following apply:
(1) The POTW or combination of POTWs has a
total cumulative design flow greater than five million gallons per day and
receives from industrial users, pollutants that pass through or interfere with
the operation of the POTW or that are otherwise subject to national
pretreatment standards.
(2) The
POTW or combination of POTWs has a total design flow of five million or less
gallons per day and receives indirect discharges, if the director determines
that such a program is necessary to prevent interference or pass through. The
director shall consider and base the determination on any of the following:
(a) The nature or volume of the indirect
discharges.
(b) The number, nature,
or frequency of violations of effluent limitations contained in the POTW's
NPDES permit.
(c) The nature,
frequency, or duration of POTW treatment process upsets.
(d) The actual or potential for contamination
of municipal sludge.
(e) Whether
the indirect discharges are subject to categorical pretreatment
standards.
(f) Any other
circumstance that causes or contributes to an interference or pass
through.
(B)
POTWs identified as being required to develop a POTW pretreatment program under
paragraph (A) of this rule shall develop and submit such a program for approval
as soon as possible, but in no case later than one year after written
notification from the director of such identification. The POTW pretreatment
program shall meet the criteria set forth in paragraph (C) of this rule and
shall be administered by the POTW to ensure compliance by industrial users with
applicable pretreatment standards and requirements. The POTW's NPDES permit
will be reissued or modified to incorporate the approved program as an
enforceable condition of the permit.
(C) A POTW pretreatment program shall be
based on the following legal authority and include all of the following
procedures. These authorities and procedures shall at all times be fully and
effectively exercised and implemented.
(1) The
POTW shall operate pursuant to legal authority, enforceable in federal, state,
or local courts, that authorizes or enables the POTW to enforce the
requirements of sections 307(b), 307(c) and 402(b)(8) of the act and any
regulation implementing those sections. Such authority may be contained in a
statute, ordinance, series of contracts, or joint powers agreements that the
POTW is authorized to enact, enter into or implement, and that is authorized by
state law. At a minimum, this legal authority shall enable the POTW to take all
of the following actions:
(a) Deny or
condition any new or increased contribution of pollutants, or change in the
nature of pollutants, to the POTW by industrial users where such contribution
does not meet applicable pretreatment standards and requirements or where such
contribution would cause the POTW to violate the NPDES permit.
(b) Require compliance with applicable
pretreatment standards and requirements by industrial users.
(c) Issue control mechanisms to control each
industrial user's contribution to the POTW to ensure compliance with applicable
pretreatment standards and requirements. In the case of industrial users
identified as significant under paragraph (S) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code, this control shall be achieved through individual or
general control mechanisms issued to each such user or group of users. Both
individual and general control mechanisms shall be enforceable and, at a
minimum, shall include all of the following:
(i) A statement of duration (in no case more
than five years).
(ii) If
determined by the POTW to be transferable, a statement of transferability with,
at a minimum, prior notification to the POTW and provision of a copy of the
existing control mechanism to the new owner or operator.
(iii) Effluent limits that are based on
applicable general pretreatment standards in rule
3745-3-04
of the Administrative Code, categorical pretreatment standards, local limits,
and state and local law.
(iv)
Requirements for all of the following:
(a)
Self-monitoring, including an identification of the pollutants to be monitored
or the process for seeking a waiver from monitoring a pollutant neither present
nor expected to be present in the discharge in accordance with paragraph (C)
(1)(d) of this rule, sampling location, sampling frequency, and sample type
based on the applicable general pretreatment standards in rule
3745-3-04
of the Administrative Code, categorical pretreatment standards, local limits,
state, and local law.
(b)
Reporting.
(c) Notification and
recordkeeping.
(v) A
statement of applicable civil and criminal penalties for violation of
pretreatment standards and requirements, and any applicable compliance
schedule. Such schedules may not extend the compliance date beyond applicable
federal deadlines.
(vi)
Requirements to control slug discharges, if determined by the POTW to be
necessary.
(d)
Authorize, at the POTW's discretion, an industrial user subject to a
categorical pretreatment standard, except for centralized waste treatment
facilities regulated by and defined in 40 C.F.R.
437, to forgo sampling of a
pollutant regulated by a categorical pretreatment standard if the industrial
user has demonstrated through sampling and other technical factors that the
pollutant is neither present nor expected to be present in the discharge, or is
present only at background levels from intake water and without any increase in
the pollutant due to activities of the industrial user. This authorization is
subject to all of the following conditions:
(i) The POTW may authorize a waiver where a
pollutant is determined to be present solely due to sanitary wastewater
discharged from the facility, provided that the sanitary wastewater is not
regulated by an applicable categorical standard and otherwise includes no
process wastewater.
(ii) A
monitoring waiver is valid only for the duration of the effective period of the
permit or other equivalent individual control mechanism, but in no case longer
than five years. The industrial user shall submit a new request for the waiver
before the waiver can be granted for each subsequent control
mechanism.
(iii) In making a
demonstration that a pollutant is not present, the industrial user shall
provide data from at least one sampling of the facility's process wastewater
prior to any treatment present at the facility that is representative of all
wastewater from all processes. The request for a monitoring waiver shall be
signed in accordance with paragraph (F) of rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code, and include the certification statement in
paragraph (F)(1) of rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code. Non-detectable sample results may only be used as a
demonstration that a pollutant is not present if the U.S. EPA approved
analytical method from 40 C.F.R.
136 with the lowest method detection limit for
that pollutant was used.
(iv) The
POTW shall include any monitoring waiver as a condition in the industrial
user's control mechanism. However, the control mechanism shall still contain a
monitoring schedule for the situation described in paragraph (C)(1)(d)(vii) of
this rule.
(v) The reasons
supporting any monitoring waiver and any information submitted by the user in
the request for the waiver shall be maintained by the POTW for three years
after expiration of the waiver.
(vi) Upon approval of the monitoring waiver
and revision of the industrial user's control mechanism by the POTW, the
industrial user shall certify on each periodic compliance monitoring report
required by paragraph (E)(1) of rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code with the following statement:
"Based on my inquiry of the person or persons directly
responsible for managing compliance with the pretreatment standards under 40
C.F.R. [specify applicable national pretreatment standard part or parts], I
certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there has been no
increase in the level of [list pollutant or pollutants] in the wastewaters due
to the activities at the facility since submittal of the last periodic report
under paragraph (E)(1) of rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code."
(vii) The POTW shall include provisions
within the control mechanism which addresses a situation where a waived
pollutant is found to be present or is expected to be present based on changes
that occur in the industrial user's operations. In this situation, the user
shall be required to immediately meet both of the following:
(a) Notify the POTW in writing.
(b) Comply with the monitoring requirements
specified in the POTW's pretreatment program and control mechanism, as required
by paragraphs (C)(1)(c)(iv) and (C)(1)(d)(iv) of this rule.
(viii) The provision for a
monitoring waiver does not relieve the industrial user of any other
certification processes and requirements established by the control authority
or in categorical pretreatment standards, except as otherwise specified in the
categorical pretreatment standard.
(e) Require the development of a compliance
schedule by each industrial user for the installation of technology required to
meet applicable pretreatment standards and requirements.
(f) Require the submission of all notices and
self-monitoring reports from industrial users as are necessary to assess and
assure compliance by industrial users with pretreatment standards and
requirements, including but not limited to the reports required in rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code.
(g)
Carry out all inspection, surveillance and monitoring procedures necessary to
determine, independent of information supplied by industrial users, compliance
or noncompliance with applicable pretreatment standards and requirements by
industrial users. Representatives of the POTW shall be authorized to enter any
premises of any industrial user in which a discharge source or treatment system
is located or in which records are required to be kept under paragraphs (J) to
(M) of rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code to assure compliance with pretreatment standards.
Such authority shall be at least as extensive as the authority provided under
section
6111.05
of the Revised Code.
(h) Obtain
remedies for noncompliance by any industrial user with any pretreatment
standard or requirement including but not limited to: the duty to allow or
carry out inspections, entry, or monitoring activities; any rules, regulations,
or orders issued by the POTW; any requirements set forth in control mechanisms
issued by the POTW; or any reporting requirements imposed by the POTW or this
chapter. Remedies shall include but are not limited to the following:
(i) The POTW shall be able to seek injunctive
relief for noncompliance by industrial users with pretreatment standards and
requirements. The POTW shall also have authority to seek or assess civil or
criminal penalties in at least the amount of one thousand dollars per day for
each violation by industrial users of pretreatment standards and requirements.
[Comment: The director may seek judicial relief or may also use
administrative penalty authority when the POTW has sought a monetary penalty
that the director finds to be insufficient.]
(ii) The POTW shall have authority and
procedures, after informal notice to the discharger, immediately and
effectively to halt or prevent any discharge of pollutants to the POTW that
reasonably appears to present an imminent endangerment to the health or welfare
of persons.
(iii) The POTW shall
also have authority and procedures, that shall include notice to the affected
industrial users and an opportunity to respond, to halt or prevent any
discharge to the POTW that presents or may present an endangerment to the
environment or that threatens to interfere with the operation of the
POTW.
(i) Comply with
the confidentiality requirements set forth in rule
3745-3-07
of the Administrative Code.
(2) The POTW shall develop and implement
procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements of a pretreatment
program. At a minimum, these procedures shall enable the POTW to do all of the
following:
(a) Identify all possible
industrial users that may be subject to the POTW pretreatment program. Any
compilation, index or inventory of industrial users made under this paragraph
shall be made available to the director upon request.
(b) Identify the character and volume of
pollutants contributed to the POTW by the industrial users identified in
paragraph (C)(2)(a) of this rule. This information shall be made available to
the director upon request.
(c)
Notify industrial users identified in paragraph (C)(2)(a) of this rule of
applicable pretreatment standards and any applicable requirements under
Sections 204(b) and 405 of the act, and Subtitles C and D of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act
42 U.S.C. sections
6901 to
6992.
Within thirty days of approval of a list of industrial users pursuant to
paragraph (C)(6) of this rule, notify each significant industrial user of the
status as such, and of all requirements applicable to it as a result of such
status.
(d) Receive and analyze
self-monitoring reports and other notices submitted by industrial users in
accordance with the self-monitoring requirements in rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code.
(e)
Randomly sample and analyze the effluent from industrial users and conduct
surveillance activities in order to identify, independent of information
supplied by industrial users, occasional and continuing noncompliance with
pretreatment standards. Inspect each significant industrial user and sample the
effluent from each such user at least once per year, except as follows:
(i) Where the POTW has authorized the
industrial user subject to a categorical pretreatment standard to forgo
sampling of a pollutant regulated by a categorical pretreatment standard in
accordance with paragraph (C)(1)(d) of this rule, the POTW shall sample for the
waived pollutant or pollutants at least once during the term of the categorical
industrial user's control mechanism. In the event that the POTW subsequently
determines that a waived pollutant is present or is expected to be present in
the industrial user's wastewater based on changes that occur in the user's
operations, the POTW shall immediately begin inspecting the user and monitoring
the user's discharge at the frequency set by the POTW's pretreatment
program.
(ii) Where the POTW has
determined that an industrial user meets the criteria for a non-significant
categorical industrial user, the POTW shall evaluate and document, at least
once per year, whether the industrial user continues to meet the definition in
paragraph (N) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code.
(iii) In the
case of mid-tier industrial users subject to reduced reporting requirements
under paragraph (E)(2) of rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code, the POTW shall conduct inspections and randomly
sample and analyze the effluent from such users at least once every two years.
If the industrial user no longer meets the definition in paragraph (M) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code, the POTW shall immediately begin inspecting the industrial
user and monitoring the effluent from the user at the frequency set by the
POTW's pretreatment program.
(f) Evaluate the need for a plan, device or
structure to control a potential slug discharge at least once during the term
of each significant industrial user's control mechanism. Additional significant
industrial users shall be evaluated within one year of being identified as a
significant industrial user. The results of slug discharges shall be made
available to the director upon request. If the POTW or Ohio EPA decides that a
slug control plan is needed, the plan shall contain, at a minimum, all of the
following elements:
(i) Description of
discharge practices, including non-routine batch discharges.
(ii) Description of stored
chemicals.
(iii) Procedures for
immediately notifying the POTW of slug discharges, including any discharge that
would violate a prohibition under paragraph (B) of rule
3745-3-04
of the Administrative Code, with procedures for follow-up written notification
within five days.
(iv) If
necessary, procedures to prevent adverse impact from accidental spills,
including inspection and maintenance of storage areas, handling and transfer of
materials, loading and unloading operations, control of wastewater discharge,
worker training, building of containment structures or equipment, measures for
containing toxic organic pollutants (including solvents), or measures and
equipment for emergency response.
(g) Investigate instances of noncompliance
with pretreatment standards and requirements, as indicated in the reports and
notices required under rule
3745-3-06
of the Administrative Code or indicated by analysis, inspection, and
surveillance activities described in paragraph (C)(2)(e) of this rule. Sample
taking and analysis and the collection of other information shall be performed
with sufficient care to produce evidence admissible in enforcement proceedings
or in judicial actions.
(h) Comply
with the public participation requirements of 40 C.F.R.
25 in the enforcement
of national pretreatment standards.
The POTW shall
inform the public if industrial users were in significant noncompliance with
applicable pretreatment standards or other pretreatment requirements at any
time during the previous twelve months. These procedures
shall include
provision for at least
an annual public notification, in at least one
newspaper of general circulation that provides meaningful public notice within
the jurisdiction served by the POTW
, of industrial
users that, at any time during the previous twelve months, were in significant
noncompliance with applicable pretreatment standards or other pretreatment
requirements
, and may also include such
actions as placing notices or announcements in media, mailing written notices
to interested parties, contacting organizations or individuals directly, or
requesting that communities notify the public through meetings, newsletters, or
other media acceptable to the director. A POTW is not required to provide
this public notice if there were no industrial users in significant
noncompliance at any time during the previous twelve months. For the purposes
of this provision, an industrial user is in significant noncompliance if the
violation meets the criteria in paragraph (C)(2)(h)(iii), (C)(2)(h)(iv), or
(C)(2)(h)(viii) of this rule. A significant industrial user is in significant
noncompliance if the violation meets any of the following criteria:
(i) Chronic violations of wastewater
discharge limits, defined here as those in which sixty-six per cent or more of
all the measurements taken for the same pollutant parameter at any permitted
monitoring point during a six-month period exceed (by any magnitude) a numeric
pretreatment standard or requirement, including instantaneous limits.
(ii) Technical review criteria (TRC)
violations, defined here as those in which thirty-three per cent or more of all
of the measurements taken for the same pollutant parameter at any permitted
monitoring point during a six-month period equal or exceed the product of the
numeric pretreatment standard or requirement including instantaneous limits,
multiplied by the applicable TRC (TRC = 1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, oil and grease,
and 1.2 for all other pollutants except pH).
(iii) Any other violation of a pretreatment
standard or requirement as defined in paragraph (P) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code (daily maximum or longer-term average, instantaneous limit,
or narrative standard) that the control authority determines has caused, alone
or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass through
(including endangering the health of POTW personnel or the general
public).
(iv) Any discharge of a
pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health, welfare or the
environment, or has resulted in the POTW's exercise of the POTW's emergency
authority under paragraph (C)(1)(h)(ii) of this rule to halt or prevent such a
discharge.
(v) Failure to meet,
within ninety days after the schedule date, a compliance schedule milestone
contained in a local control mechanism or enforcement order for starting
construction, completing construction, or attaining final compliance.
(vi) Failure to provide, within forty-five
days after the due date, required reports such as baseline monitoring reports,
ninety-day compliance reports, periodic self-monitoring reports, reports on
compliance with compliance schedules, or any other reports required by the
control authority.
(vii) Failure to
accurately report noncompliance.
(viii) Any other violation or group of
violations, including a violation of BMPs, that the control authority
determines adversely affects the operation or implementation of the local
pretreatment program.
(3) The POTW shall have sufficient resources
and qualified personnel to carry out the authorities and procedures described
in paragraphs (C)(1) and (C)(2) of this rule.
(4) The POTW shall develop, update as
necessary and enforce technically supported local limits that will protect the
POTW against interference and pass through. The POTW may develop BMPs and such
BMPs shall be considered local limits and pretreatment standards for the
purpose of this rule upon approval by Ohio EPA.
(5) The POTW shall develop and implement an
enforcement response plan. This plan shall contain detailed procedures
indicating how a POTW will investigate and respond to instances of industrial
user noncompliance. The plan shall detail the following, at a minimum:
(a) Describe how the POTW will investigate
instances of noncompliance.
(b)
Describe the types of escalating enforcement responses the POTW will take in
response to all anticipated types of industrial user violations and the time
periods within which responses will take place.
(c) Identify each official, including their
respective title, that is responsible for each type of response.
(d) Discuss the POTW's primary responsibility
to enforce all applicable pretreatment requirements and standards, as detailed
in paragraphs (C) (1) and (C)(2) of this rule.
(6) The POTW shall prepare and maintain a
list of the POTW's industrial users, as defined in rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code. The list shall conform to both of the following:
(a) Identify the criteria in paragraphs
(S)(1)(a) and (S)(1)(b) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code applicable to each industrial user and, when necessary,
indicate whether the POTW has made a determination pursuant to one of the
following:
(i) Paragraphs (N)(4) and
(S)(1)(c) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code that such industrial user should not be considered a
significant industrial user.
(ii)
Paragraph (M) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code that such industrial user should be considered a mid-tier
categorical industrial user.
(b) Initially be submitted to the director
when a POTW is applying for approval of the pretreatment program or, in the
case of POTWs with approved programs, at the time a program modification
request is submitted to provide for a non-significant categorical or mid-tier
industrial user classification. Any modification to the list shall be submitted
to the director in the POTW's annual report, pursuant to paragraph (J) of this
rule.
(7) The POTW may
issue a general control mechanism to a group of significant industrial users.
(a) A general control mechanism may be used
for a group of significant industrial users if, in the opinion of the POTW, the
users are more appropriately controlled under a general control mechanism than
under individual control mechanisms. Each user in the group shall meet all of
the following requirements:
(i) Have the same
or substantially similar types of operations.
(ii) Discharge the same types of
wastes.
(iii) Require the same
effluent limitations.
(iv) Require
the same or similar monitoring.
(b) To be covered by a general control
mechanism, the significant industrial user shall be required to file a written
request for coverage that identifies the user's contact information, the user's
production processes, the types of wastes generated, the location for
monitoring all wastes covered by the general control mechanism, any requests in
accordance with paragraph (C)(1)(d) of this rule for a monitoring waiver for a
pollutant neither present nor expected to be present in the discharge, and any
other information the POTW deems appropriate. A monitoring waiver for a
pollutant neither present nor expected to be present in the discharge is not
effective in the general control mechanism until the POTW has provided written
notice to the significant industrial user that a waiver request has been
granted in accordance with paragraph (C)(1)(d) of this rule.
(c) The POTW shall retain a copy of the
general control mechanism, documentation to support the POTW's determination
that a specific significant industrial user meets the criteria in paragraphs
(C)(7)(a)(i) to (C)(7)(a)(iv) of this rule, and a copy of the user's written
request for coverage for three years after the expiration of the general
control mechanism.
(d) The POTW
shall not control a significant industrial user through a general control
mechanism where the user is subject to production-based categorical
pretreatment standards or categorical pretreatment standards expressed as mass
of pollutant discharged per day or for industrial users whose limits are based
on the combined wastestream formula or net/gross calculations in
40 C.F.R.
403.6(e) and
40 C.F.R.
403.15.
(8) The POTW shall maintain records of all
information resulting from any monitoring activities, regardless of whether
such monitoring activities were required by this chapter, including
documentation associated with BMPs. Such records shall be retained for a
minimum of three years and shall include the following for all samples:
(a) The date, exact place, method, and time
of sampling and the names of the person or persons taking the
samples.
(b) The dates the analyses
were performed.
(c) The name and
address of the laboratory that performed the analyses.
(d) The analytical techniques or methods
used.
(e) The results of such
analyses.
(9) In
addition to the requirements in paragraph (C)(8) of this rule, the POTW shall
retain all of the following for a minimum of three years:
(a) Any reports submitted by an industrial
user pursuant to this chapter of the Administrative Code.
(b) Any documentation of industrial user
inspections.
(c) Any record of
communications pertaining to compliance with the pretreatment
program.
(10) A POTW
that chooses to receive electronic documents is required to satisfy the
requirements in 40 C.F.R. part
3 .
(D) POTW pretreatment program submission.
(1) A POTW requesting approval of a POTW
pretreatment program shall develop a program description that includes the
information set forth in paragraph (D) (2) of this rule. This description shall
be submitted to the director who will make a determination on the request for
program approval in accordance with the procedures described in Chapters 3745.
and 119. of the Revised Code, and Chapters 3745-47 and 3745-49 of the
Administrative Code.
(2) The
program description shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
(a) A statement from the city solicitor or a
city official acting in a comparable capacity (or the attorney for those POTWs
that have independent legal counsel) that the POTW has authority adequate to
carry out the programs described in paragraphs (A), (B), and (C) of this rule.
This statement shall identify all of the following:
(i) Identify the provision of the legal
authority under paragraph (C)(1) of this rule that provides the basis for each
procedure under paragraph (C)(2) of this rule.
(ii) Identify the manner in which the POTW
will implement the program requirements set forth in paragraphs (A), (B), and
(C) of this rule, including the means by which pretreatment standards will be
applied to individual industrial users (e.g., by permit).
(iii) Identify how the POTW intends to ensure
compliance with pretreatment standards and requirements, and how to enforce
them in the event of noncompliance by industrial users.
(b) A copy of any statutes, ordinances,
regulations, agreements, or other authorities relied upon by the POTW for the
administration of the program. This submission shall include a statement
reflecting the endorsement or approval of the local boards or bodies
responsible for supervising and funding the POTW pretreatment program if
approved.
(c) A brief description
of the POTW organization, including an organization chart, that will administer
the pretreatment program. If more than one agency is responsible for
administration of the program, the responsible agencies should be identified,
their respective responsibilities should be delineated, and their procedures
for coordination should be set forth.
(d) A description of the funding levels and
full-and part-time manpower available to implement the program.
(E) Modification of
POTW pretreatment programs. Either the director or a POTW with an approved
pretreatment program may initiate program modification at any time to reflect
changing conditions at the POTW. Program modification is necessary whenever
there is a significant change in the operation of a POTW pretreatment program
that differs from the information in the POTW's submission, as approved under
paragraph (D)(1) of this rule.
(1) The POTW
shall submit a pretreatment program modification request to the director for
any modification to the POTW's pretreatment program at least forty-five days
prior to when it is to be implemented by the POTW.
(a) At a minimum, a pretreatment program
modification request shall contain the following:
(i) A statement of the basis for the desired
modification.
(ii) The portions of
the approved program being proposed for modification and the proposed
changes.
(iii) Any other documents
the director determines to be necessary.
(b) If the director determines that a
modification is a substantial modification, then the POTW shall obtain the
director's approval prior to the implementation of the modification. The
director shall determine if a modification request is nonsubstantial or
substantial based on the criteria in paragraph (E)(2) of this rule. When
approving or disapproving a modification request, the director shall follow the
procedures in paragraphs (F) and (G) of this rule.
(2) Substantial modifications include any of
the following:
(a) Any modification that makes
the POTW's legal authorities, as described in paragraph (C) of this rule, less
stringent than they were prior to the modification, except for modifications
that directly reflect a revision to this chapter, or 40 C.F.R. chapter I,
subchapter
N, and are reported as nonsubstantial modifications pursuant to
paragraph (G) of this rule.
(b) Any
modification that makes the POTW's local limits less stringent than they were
prior to the modification, except for the modifications to local limits for pH
and the reallocation of the maximum allowable industrial loading of a pollutant
that does not increase the total industrial loading of the pollutant, that are
reported pursuant to paragraph (G) of this rule. Maximum allowable industrial
loading means the total mass of a pollutant that all industrial users of a POTW
or a subgroup of industrial users identified by the POTW may discharge pursuant
to limits developed under paragraph (C) of this rule.
(c) Any change of conditions within the
POTW's control mechanism, as described in paragraph (C)(1)(c) of this rule,
except for modification that directly reflects a revision to this chapter or 40
C.F.R. chapter I, subchapter
N.
(d)
A decrease in the frequency of self-monitoring or reporting required of
industrial users.
(e) A decrease in
the frequency of industrial user inspections or sampling by the POTW.
(f) Any change to the POTW's confidentiality
procedures.
(g) A request for
authorization to review and take final action on industrial permits to install
for indirect discharges from industrial users.
(h) A request for using the classification of
non-significant categorical industrial user, as defined in paragraph (N) of
rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code.
(i) A request
for using the classification of mid-tier categorical industrial user, as
defined in paragraph (M) of rule
3745-3-01 of the
Administrative Code.
(j) A request
for authorization to issue general control mechanisms, as described in
paragraph (C)(7) of this rule.
(k)
A request for authorization to implement a monitoring waiver, as described in
paragraph (C)(1)(d) of this rule. A request for this authorization is not
required when implementing a monitoring waiver allowed by an applicable
categorical pretreatment standard.
(l) A request for authorization to implement
enforceable alternative limits, excluding the wastestream formula, as defined
in paragraph (I) of rule
3745-3-09
of the Administrative Code.
(m) Any
other modification designated as a substantial modification by the director on
the basis that the modification could result in any of the following:
(i) A significant impact on the operation of
the POTW's pretreatment program.
(ii) An increase in pollutant loadings at the
POTW.
(iii) Less stringent
requirements being imposed on industrial users of the POTW.
(3) Nonsubstantial
modifications include both of the following:
(a) Any modification that is not a
substantial modification, as described in paragraph (E)(2) of this
rule.
(b) Any modification to
correct typographical errors.
(F) Approval procedures for substantial
modifications.
(1) The director shall approve
or disapprove the modification based on the requirements in paragraph (C) of
this rule, and using the procedures in Chapters 3745. and 119. of the Revised
Code, and Chapters 3745-47 and 3745-49 of the Administrative Code. The
modification shall become effective upon approval by the director.
(2) Notices required by
40
C.F.R.
403.11 may be performed by the POTW
provided that the POTW notice otherwise satisfies the requirements of
40
C.F.R.
403.11.
(G) Approval procedures for nonsubstantial
modifications.
(1) The POTW shall notify the
director of any nonsubstantial modification at least forty-five days prior to
implementation by the POTW in accordance with the provisions of paragraph
(E)(1) of this rule.
(2) If the
director does not notify the POTW within forty-five days of the director's
decision to approve or deny the modification, or to treat the modification as
substantial under paragraph (E)(2) of this rule, the POTW may implement the
modification.
(H) All
program modifications shall be incorporated into the POTW's NPDES permit or
NPDES permits upon approval.
(I)
The director may revoke a POTW's pretreatment program prescribed under
paragraphs (A) and (B) of this rule if the director determines that such a
program is no longer necessary. Prior to revoking a program, the director shall
consider and base the determination on all of the following:
(1) The nature or volume of indirect
discharges.
(2) The number, nature,
or frequency of violations of POTW effluent limitations contained in the POTW's
NPDES permit.
(3) The nature,
frequency, or duration of POTW treatment process upsets.
(4) The actual or potential for contamination
of municipal sludge.
(5) Whether
the indirect discharges are subject to categorical pretreatment
standards.
(6) Any other
circumstance that causes or contributes to an interference or a pass
through.
(J) Any POTW
that has a pretreatment program shall provide the director with a report that
describes the POTW's program activities, including activities of all
participating agencies if more than one jurisdiction is involved in the local
program. The report required by this paragraph shall be submitted to the
director annually as specified in the POTW's NPDES permit. The report shall
contain such information as the director deems necessary.
(1) These reports shall be signed by a
principal executive officer, ranking elected official or other duly authorized
employee. The duly authorized employee shall be an individual or position
having responsibility for the overall operation of the facility or the
pretreatment program. This authorization shall be made in writing by the
principal executive officer or ranking elected official, and submitted to the
director prior to or together with the report being submitted.
(2) These reports shall be maintained in
accordance with paragraphs (C)(8) to (C) (10) of this rule.
(3) The director may require, as an NPDES
permit condition or otherwise, electronic submittal of these reports using
information systems compatible with those of Ohio EPA.
(K) No POTW shall authorize or otherwise
allow an industrial user to discharge pollutants to the POTW in violation of
pretreatment standards established in this chapter. This provision shall not be
interpreted to prevent a POTW from adopting or enforcing a pretreatment
standard that is more stringent than provided in this chapter.
(L) Industrial user permits to install. The
director may authorize a municipal corporation, county, or special district
that owns or operates a POTW or sewerage system that has an approved
pretreatment program to review and take final action on industrial permits to
install for indirect discharges by industrial users of the treatment works or
sewerage system.
(1) In performing the review
and final action on permits to install for indirect discharges by industrial
users of the treatment works or sewerage system, the municipal corporation,
county, or special district shall apply criteria and procedures specified by
the director. This provision shall not be interpreted to prevent a municipal
corporation, county, or special district from applying criteria or procedures
that are more stringent than specified by the director.
(2) A municipal corporation, county, or
special district that owns or operates a POTW or sewerage system that has an
approved pretreatment program requesting authorization to review and take final
action on industrial permits to install for indirect discharges by industrial
users of the treatment works or sewerage system shall submit the request in
accordance with the procedures described in paragraph (E) of this rule.
Information to be submitted with the request shall be determined by the
director.
(3) The director may
periodically evaluate the review performed by the municipal corporation,
county, or special district that has received authorization from the director
to review and take final action on permits to install under paragraph (L) of
this rule and may terminate such authorization for poor quality review, or for
failure to apply rules, criteria, or procedures specified by the director.
(M) POTWs administering an approved
pretreatment program shall retain all records of pretreatment program
modification requests, pretreatment program submissions, and control mechanisms
and pollution prevention alternatives (i.e. slug control plan, toxic organic
management plan) for as long as these documents are effective. Outdated
versions of these documents shall be maintained for at least three years after
the date on which the documents became ineffective. These documents are
considered ineffective if relevant portions of the pretreatment program have
been replaced with a revised document or if the document is no longer
applicable. The POTW shall make such records available for inspection and
copying by the director. The period of retention shall be extended during the
course of any unresolved litigation regarding the discharge of pollutants by
the industrial user or the operation of the POTW pretreatment program or when
requested by the director.