Or. Admin. R. 150-306-0130 - Oregon Land Information System Fund and the Oregon Map Project
Current through Register Vol. 61, No. 4, April 1, 2022
(1) Definitions.
For the purpose of this rule:
(a) "County" is
the agency, approved by the County Assessor, requesting funds from the Oregon
Map Project (ORMAP).
(b)
"Department" means the Oregon Department of Revenue.
(c) "Director" means the director of the
Oregon Department of Revenue.
(d)
"Fund" means the Oregon Land Information System (OLIS) Fund. The fund provides
financial support for ORMAP. The fund is separate from the state's General
Fund. The fund's source is an allocated dollar amount received quarterly from
each county's collected document-recording fees, as provided by ORS
205.323(3)(a).
(e) "Grant" means a money award
from the OLIS Fund.
(f) "Oregon
Map Project" (ORMAP) means the program implemented and authorized by the
department to establish a statewide base map for facilitating and improving
Oregon's property tax mapping system and for providing other Geographic
Information System (GIS) benefits, pursuant to ORS
306.132 and
306.135.
(g) "ORMAP Project Coordinator" is the
department employee tasked with administering the ORMAP project.
(h) "Oregon Land Information System Advisory
Committee" (Advisory Committee) is a team of individuals appointed by the
department's director. The committee is comprised of ORMAP stakeholders in
private industry, and in federal, state, or local government who have an
interest in the success of the program (OAR 150-306.135).
(i) "ORMAP Funding Criteria" (Funding
Criteria) are listed in the document used for the administrative review,
technical review, and priority scoring for grant applications. The criteria is
part of the grant application and on the ORMAP web site (www.ormap.net).
(j) "ORMAP Goals" are the project goals
approved by the advisory committee. The goals are identified on the ORMAP web
site.
(k) "ORMAP Policies" are
administrative policies approved by the advisory committee. The policies are
identified on the ORMAP web site.
(l) "ORMAP Technical Group" (Tech Group) is
comprised of volunteers who have education or experience in surveying,
cadastral cartography, legal descriptions, mapping software, database software,
or other GIS technology. The group evaluates and provides recommendations on
individual county project grant applications and ORMAP policies to the
department and the advisory committee.
(m) "ORMAP Technical Specifications" (Tech
Specs) is a minimum standard used to determine if taxlots and tax maps remapped
with ORMAP funds have been completed and meet ORMAP goals.
(n) "ORMAP Tools Group" (Tools Group) is
comprised of volunteers who have education or experience in surveying,
cadastral cartography, legal descriptions, mapping software, database software,
or other GIS technology. This group develops and provides support for map
editing tools used in the construction of Oregon assessor's maps.
(o) "Project" means a mapping activity that
is eligible for a grant from the fund.
(2) The department administers the fund to
fulfill the ORMAP goals. The department adopts priorities for funding specific
projects, goals, or geographic areas in support of ORMAP. The grant is intended
to assist the counties in the development of a statewide base map system. The
department makes the following disbursements from the fund:
(a) Quarterly payments for ORMAP
administrative costs to the department. Administrative costs include but are
not limited to, personnel, equipment, and other services and supplies required
in completing the ORMAP goals.
(b)
Tools group funding. The tools group is eligible for funding at 3 percent of
the total annual available funds, up to $25,000 per year.
(c) Grants to the counties. Counties are
eligible for grants to support eligible ORMAP projects and for the purchase of
approved equipment or software.
(3) Counties applying for a grant to fund an
ORMAP project must complete an ORMAP Grant Application; Form No. 150-304-101-9.
The application is available upon request to the department or on the ORMAP web
site.
(a) Completed project grant
applications must be submitted to the department's ORMAP Project Coordinator no
later than the due date for that funding cycle, which is posted on the ORMAP
web site. The department accepts grant applications for the purchase of
approved equipment or software at any time.
(b) A county's grant request must adhere to
the ORMAP goals, tech specs, and the county's business plan for achieving ORMAP
goals.
(c) A county that submits a
grant application must have a representative available during the tech group
meeting to respond to questions related to the application.
(d) If requested by the department, a county
must provide a reduction package by completing the Alternative Funding Request
form developed by the department and attached to the grant application. The
county must describe the modified deliverable in the event full funding is not
possible.
(4) The ORMAP
Project Coordinator reviews applications using the current version of the ORMAP
policies and the funding criteria's section titled, Administrative Review
Criteria.
(a) Administrative review criteria
are all pass/fail and include:
(A) The county
maintains a current online ORMAP business plan and provides the department with
a status map of the county's ORMAP project phases,
(B) The county has no more than two
outstanding ORMAP grant contracts,
(C) The county agrees to share data with the
department for its internal use,
(D) The county has proposed a project
directed at meeting one of the ORMAP goals,
(E) The county has provided the department
with the most current calendar year's countywide cadastral data, which meets
the Cadastral Data Exchange Standard,
(F) At the department's discretion, the
county provides an alternative funding request for the grant application
outlining funding reductions of varying percentages defined by the department,
and
(G) Final remapping grant
application. If a county grant application proposes to bring the entire county
to meeting ORMAP Goal 6 (100% of county tax maps meeting the technical
specifications) and the application meets other criteria for approval, it may
receive priority for a one-time full funding to the 20% funding limitation for
that funding cycle. If more than one county submits a final remapping grant
request for a funding cycle, the tech group and advisory committee may review
final grant applications and make recommendations for prioritizing and funding
final remapping grant requests.
(b) The ORMAP Project Coordinator will notify
the county applicant if any of the criteria are not met. The applicant may
resubmit an amended grant application prior to the grant cycle deadline.
(c) An application that does not
pass all the department's administrative review criteria referenced in section
(4) of this rule will be denied.
(d) Applications for approved equipment and
software may be awarded at the discretion of the department without review by
the tech group. A list of approved equipment and software is attached to the
grant application form.
(5) A project grant request that passes the
department's administrative review process will be submitted to the tech group
for review at its first scheduled meeting for that funding cycle. Each grant
application will be reviewed using the current version of the funding criteria
section titled, Technical Review Criteria.
(a) Technical review criteria are pass/fail
and include:
(A) The project demonstrates a
successful process,
(B) The
project has a completion time frame that does not exceed one year, and
(C) The project has reasonable and
measurable deliverables.
(b) If additional information is requested by
the tech group, the county must submit a written addendum to the ORMAP Project
Coordinator by the date specified.
(c) The tech group may review any information
submitted at its next scheduled meeting. The department will determine if more
meetings are required to complete the application review process.
(6) The department will determine
if there are sufficient funds to provide full funding to all grant requests
that pass the technical review. The department will provide funding to as many
counties as possible as its first priority. If full funding is not available,
grant applications will then be scored using the current Priority Scoring
section of the funding criteria.
(a) The
Priority Scoring criteria will each be assigned points, and include:
(A) The project is identified as a county
edge matching project,
(B) The
project is part of an ongoing process,
(C) The county currently has a low completion
percentage of taxlots that meet the ORMAP Technical Specifications,
(D) The project shows a multi-county effort
to encourage collaboration,
(E)
The project shows funding partnerships,
(F) The project demonstrates significantly
greater costs if not funded in the current cycle,
(G) The county has had significant
contribution of non-department resources in completing ORMAP Goal 6,
(H) The county has signed a statewide data
sharing agreement to share its taxlot data, and
(I) The County voluntary withdraws the
application from the current funding cycle.
(b) The department will rank each grant
application in point total order, with the higher scoring projects receiving
preference, using the Priority Scoring methodology.
(c) The tech group will evaluate the
department's ranking and make findings and recommendations as to the
department's application of that methodology.
(d) The department will take account of each
of the tech group's findings and recommendations in the course of recommending
approval, denial, or partial funding of the grant based on the Priority Scoring
and, if applicable, the quality and quantity of the deliverable in the event of
insufficient overall funds.
(7) The department may make changes to the
criteria listed in sections (4), (5) and (6) of this rule and notice will be
given in the grant application prior to the funding cycle.
(8) The department will provide a written
recommendation on grant awards to the advisory committee.
(a) The advisory committee will review the
written recommendation of the department and may provide suggestions and input
during each funding cycle.
(b) The
department will consider any suggestions and input from the advisory committee,
and in its discretion, may modify the original written recommendation on grant
awards.
(c) The department will
notify each grant requestor of its final grant determination and award by
letter within two weeks of notifying the advisory committee of grant
determinations.
(9) The
department will consider appeals of grant decisions.
(a) Appeals must be submitted in writing to
the department within 30 days from the action that is being appealed.
(b) If an appellant is successful
and additional funds are granted, the additional funding will be deducted from
the next quarterly fund deposit.
(10) The department and the grant award
recipient must execute an intergovernmental service agreement prior to the
disbursement from the fund.
(11)
The department must review and approve all documentation of completed project
deliverables before approving the payment from the fund to grant recipients.
(12) The department may approve
modifications to awarded ORMAP contracts. These modifications may be
adjustments to the timeline, deliverables, or amount awarded. The modifications
are granted at the discretion of the department based on the availability of
funds or the circumstances that required the modification of the contract.
(a) To be granted a contract modification,
the county assessor must send, by letter or e-mail, to the ORMAP Project
Coordinator the completed ORMAP Contract Modification Request form attached to
the grant application. The form is also available upon request to the
department's ORMAP Project Coordinator.
(b) The department must receive contract
modification requests one month prior to the contract expiration
date.
Notes
Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 305.100
Stats. Implemented: ORS 306.132, 306.135
The following state regulations pages link to this page.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.