Or. Admin. Code § 137-003-0655 - Further Hearing and Issuance of Final Order
(1) After issuance of the proposed order, if
any, the administrative law judge shall not hold any further hearing or revise
or amend the proposed order except at the request of the agency, except as
provided in this subsection. The administrative law judge may withdraw a
proposed order for correction within three working days of issuance of the
proposed order. If the administrative law judge withdraws a proposed order for
correction, the time for filing exceptions shall begin on the date the
administrative law judge issues the corrected proposed order.
(2) If the agency requests the administrative
law judge to conduct a further hearing under section (1) of this rule, the
agency shall specify the scope of the hearing and the issues to be addressed.
After further hearing, the administrative law judge shall issue a proposed
order.
(3) If the administrative
law judge's proposed order recommended a decision favorable to a party and the
agency intends to reject that recommendation and issue an order adverse to that
party, the agency shall issue an amended proposed order if:
(a) The official(s) who are to render the
final order have not considered the record; or
(b) The changes to the proposed order are not
within the scope of any exceptions or agency comment to which there was an
opportunity to respond.
(4) Any amended proposed order issued under
section (3) of this rule shall comply with OAR 137-003-0665(3) and (4) and
shall include a statement that the party may file exceptions and present
argument to the agency. The agency shall serve the amended proposed order on
each party to the contested case proceeding.
(5) The agency or, if authorized to issue a
final order, administrative law judge shall consider any timely exceptions and
argument before issuing a final order. If exceptions are received, the agency
or the administrative law judge may not consider new or additional evidence
unless the agency requests the administrative law judge to conduct further
hearings under section (1) of this rule. The agency or administrative law judge
may issue an amended proposed order in light of any exceptions or
argument.
(6) The agency or, if
authorized, the administrative law judge shall issue a final order in
accordance with OAR 137-003-0665. The agency may adopt the proposed order as
the final order, or modify the proposed order and issue the modified order as
the final order.
(7) An agency
should issue an amended proposed order or a final order within 90 days of the
date of the proposed order. When an agency will not issue an amended proposed
order or final order within 90 days of the proposed order, the agency shall
give written notice to the administrative law judge and all parties of the date
by which the agency expects to issue the amended proposed order or the final
order. This rule does not apply to proceedings under ORS chapters 539 and
537.670 through 537.700. An agency may adopt a rule exempting classes of cases
from the requirements of this subsection upon the agency's determination that,
due to the nature of the cases, 90 days normally is an insufficient time in
which to issue an amended proposed or final order. The requirements of this
subsection apply to all orders for which the proposed order is issued after
January 31, 2012.
(8) If an agency
decision maker has an actual or potential conflict of interest as defined in
ORS 244.020(1) or (7), that decision maker shall comply with the requirements
of ORS Chapter 244, including but not limited to 244.120 and 244.130.
Notes
Stat. Auth.: ORS 183.341
Stats. Implemented: ORS 183.341 & 183.630
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.