In determining whether a proposed facility satisfies the
requirements of this rule, the Council will accept, where applicable, the
assumptions and methods used or approved by the federal Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) or the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) in evaluating
compliance with their respective regulations, in the absence of clear and
convincing evidence that the use of such assumptions and methods will not
adequately protect the health and safety of the public. To issue a site
certificate for a uranium mill, the Council must find that:
(1) The facility can be designed, constructed
and operated such that there is reasonable assurance that:
(a) During normal operations of the facility,
the annual radiation dose equivalent to any member of the public will not
exceed the limits specified in OAR
345-095-0090(l).
(b) The release of airborne effluents will
not result in ambient levels exceeding the limits in OAR
345-095-0090(2).
(c) The facility shall be located at a remote
site. To be considered remote, the calculated population doses within a 50-mile
radius of the mill resulting from all exposure pathways will not exceed:
(A) Whole Body -- 50 person
rem/year;
(B) Lung -- 500 person
rem/year;
(C) Bone -- 1250 person
rem/year.
(2)
(a) The site selected for final disposal is
suitable for disposal of uranium mill tailings and wastes from decommissioning
the uranium mill and the proposed amount thereof intended for disposal at the
site. In order for the Council to find the site to be suitable, the Council
must find that the applicant has evaluated reasonable disposal methods for the
site including, but not limited to, below ground disposal, fixation of tailings
with asphalt or cement, single tailings dam and multiple dams or
dikes.
(b) In the evaluation
required under (a), the applicant must provide the data needed to determine the
effect of the alternate disposal method on the economic viability of the
facility. The applicant must demonstrate that reasonably expected wind and
water erosion will not uncover uranium mill tailings and wastes from
decommissioning the uranium mill and that surface and ground waters will not
become contaminated with chemicals or radioactivity in excess of those levels
specified in OAR
345-092-0040(4).
The applicant must demonstrate that water contamination will not occur by use
of a transport model that uses the existing aquifer boundaries, hydrogeologic
flow rates, soil absorption phenomena (e.g., filtration, ion exchange,
precipitation, etc.) and the leachability of materials from the uranium mill
tailings under reasonably expected natural conditions at the site. The
applicant must consider perturbations caused by reasonably expected
hydrogeologic changes at the site.
(3) The amount of uranium mill tailings and
waste that would result from decommissioning the uranium mill must be disposed
of at the site in Oregon, rather than permitting their uncontrolled
abandonment, to protect the environment and the health, safety and welfare of
the people of the state from such wastes.
(4) There is no available, economically
feasible alternative to the applicant's proposal for disposal of uranium mill
tailings and wastes from decommissioning the uranium mill, in the proposed
amounts, inside or outside of the state. The applicant must evaluate
alternatives including, but not limited to return of tailings to the mine,
creation of a regional disposal facility, disposal in an out-of-state
commercial disposal site and at least 2 alternative sites within 20 miles. The
Council will not consider an alternative to be available unless such
alternative provides superior protection to the public health and safety than
the proposed site.
(5) The proposed
amount of uranium mill tailings and wastes from decommissioning the uranium
mill can be disposed of at the site in a manner compatible with the regulatory
programs of the federal government in existence on the date of adoption of
these standards for disposal of such wastes.
(6) The proposed amount of uranium mill
tailings and wastes from decommissioning the uranium mill can be disposed of at
the site in a manner that is coordinated with the regulatory programs of
adjacent states in existence on the date of adoption of these standards for
disposal of such wastes. To support a Council finding that the manner of
disposal can be coordinated with regulatory programs of adjacent states, the
applicant must demonstrate that radiological impacts in adjacent states from
disposal of uranium mill tailings and wastes from decommissioning the uranium
mill are not likely to exceed the applicable standards for disposal of these
wastes that are in effect in the adjacent state on the effective date of this
standard.
(7) After disposal of
uranium mill tailings and wastes from decommissioning the uranium mill, the
calculated radon emanation rates at the site are likely to be no greater than 2
picocuries per square meter per second above natural background levels that
existed at the site prior to disposal of any wastes, and calculated gamma
radiation levels are not likely to be statistically different from background
levels that existed at the site prior to disposal of any wastes.
(8) The applicant has identified all
reasonably expected loads, including but not limited to seismic events and
liquification, hydrostatic, flood, wind and ice loads expected to be placed on
any dike or dams associated with the facility, and the applicant has
demonstrated that such dikes and dams can withstand these loads without
failure.