Or. Admin. Code § 660-012-0035 - Evaluation and Selection of Transportation System Alternatives
(1) The TSP shall
be based upon evaluation of potential impacts of system alternatives that can
reasonably be expected to meet the identified transportation needs in a safe
manner and at a reasonable cost with available technology. The following shall
be evaluated as components of system alternatives:
(a) Improvements to existing facilities or
services;
(b) New facilities and
services, including different modes or combinations of modes that could
reasonably meet identified transportation needs;
(c) Transportation system management
measures;
(d) Demand management
measures; and
(e) A no-build system
alternative required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 or other
laws.
(2) The following
standards shall be used to evaluate and select alternatives:
(a) The transportation system shall support
urban and rural development by providing types and levels of transportation
facilities and services appropriate to serve the land uses identified in the
acknowledged comprehensive plan;
(b) The transportation system shall be
consistent with state and federal standards for protection of air, land and
water quality including the State Implementation Plan under the Federal Clean
Air Act and the State Water Quality Management Plan;
(c) The transportation system shall minimize
adverse economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences;
(d) The transportation system shall minimize
conflicts and facilitate connections between modes of transportation;
and
(e) The transportation system
shall avoid principal reliance on any one mode of transportation by increasing
transportation choices to reduce principal reliance on the
automobile.
(3) Where
existing and committed transportation facilities and services have adequate
capacity to support the land uses in the acknowledged comprehensive plan, the
local government shall not be required to evaluate alternatives as provided in
this rule.
(4) Transportation uses
or improvements listed in OAR
660-012-0065(3)(d) to (g) and
(o) and located in an urban fringe may be
included in a TSP only if the project identified in the transportation system
plan as described in section (6) of this rule, will not significantly reduce
peak hour travel time for the route as determined pursuant to section (5) of
this rule, or the jurisdiction determines that the following alternatives
cannot reasonably satisfy the purpose of the improvement project:
(a) Improvements to transportation facilities
and services within the urban growth boundary;
(b) Transportation system management measures
that do not significantly increase capacity; or
(c) Transportation demand management
measures. The jurisdiction needs only to consider alternatives that are safe
and effective, consistent with applicable standards and that can be implemented
at a reasonable cost using available technology.
(5) A project significantly reduces peak hour
travel time when, based on recent data, the time to travel the route is reduced
more than 15 percent during weekday peak hour conditions over the length of the
route located within the urban fringe. For purposes of measuring travel time, a
route shall be identified by the predominant traffic flows in the project
area.
(6) A "transportation
improvement project" described in section (4) of this rule:
(a) Is intended to solve all of the
reasonably foreseeable transportation problems within a general geographic
location, within the planning period; and
(b) Has utility as an independent
transportation project.
Notes
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 197.040 & ORS 197.245
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 195.025, ORS 197.230, ORS 197.245, ORS 197.712, ORS 197.717 & ORS 197.012
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.