Or. Admin. Code § 836-042-0210 - Rating Plans for Which Employers May be Combined; Retrospective Rating Deposit Required; When Group Rating May be Applied
(1) An insurer may use the combined
experience of a group of employers for experience rating, retrospective rating,
or premium discounting of workers' compensation insurance premiums for the
employers in the group. An insurer may also apply other factors approved by the
Insurance Commissioner which are not adequately reflected in experience rating,
retrospective rating, or premium discounting and which satisfy the requirements
of section (6) of this rule.
(2) If
the combined experience of a group of employers is used for experience rating,
a modification factor to supplement the modification factors of individual
employers shall be calculated and distributed by a licensed rating organization
according to the Experience Rating Plan of the National Council on Compensation
Insurance filed with the Insurance Commissioner. Limitations or other data
adjustments shall be applied only to the experience data of individual group
members. The rating organization shall provide such service to an insurer upon
request and may charge a reasonable fee.
(3) The premiums of a group of employers may
be combined for premium discounting if the group can reasonably justify the
combination by showing savings in acquisition, premium collection, policy
issuance or other insurance administrative expenses or insurance services
provided by an organization of which employers in the group are
members.
(4) The premiums of a
group of employers may be combined for retrospective rating either to enhance
volume and reduce insurance charges or to realize expense savings as would be
allowed for premium discounting.
(5) Rating modifications based on the
combined experience of a group of employers shall apply to individual members
of the group as of the individual member's first anniversary rating date on or
after the group anniversary rating date.
(6) An insurer may file a group rating plan
for applying factors not adequately recognized and reflected by experience
rating, retrospective rating, or premium discounting. The effective date of a
proposed plan shall be the date specified in the filing, but not sooner than 30
days after the filing is received by the Insurance Commissioner. The
Commissioner may approve an earlier effective date not preceding the date the
filing was received. If, within the 30-day period, the Commissioner finds the
proposal does not meet the standards and requirements of ORS Chapter 737 and
this section, the Commissioner shall notify the insurer that the proposal has
been disapproved, stating the basis for such action, and the proposal shall not
become effective. If, following the 30-day period, the commissioner finds the
proposal does not satisfy the requirements and standards of ORS Chapter 737,
the commissioner may proceed according to ORS
737.336(2),
737.215, and
737.045 to disapprove the plan.
The Commissioner shall not approve a plan for applying rating factors unless:
(a) All factors can be objectively evaluated
and are consistently and uniformly applied and evidence thereof maintained by
the insurer;
(b) Premium
modifications for each factor are supported by actuarial evidence;
(c) The insurer captures and maintains
statistical data demonstrating the rating equity of applying premium
modifications; and
(d) The
application of a rating factor does not inappropriately duplicate the
recognition of experience used in other rating factors.
Notes
Stat. Auth.: ORS 731.244 & ORS 737.316
Stats. Implemented: ORS 737.316
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.