Or. Admin. R. 410-141-3555 - Resolving Disputes between Health Care Entities and CCOs that Concern CCO Contact Award
Current through Register Vol. 60, No. 12, December 1, 2021
(1) The
dispute resolution process described in this rule applies only when, under ORS
414.635:
(a) An entity is applying to the Authority
for contract award as a CCO (applicant);
(b) A Health Care Entity (HCE) and the
applicant (together, the "parties" for purposes of this rule) have failed to
agree upon terms for a contract; and
(c) One or more of the following occurs:
(A) The applicant states that the HCE is
necessary for the applicant to qualify as a CCO;
(B) An HCE states that its inclusion is
necessary for the applicant to be awarded a CCO; or
(C) In reviewing the applicant's information,
the Authority identifies the HCE as necessary for the applicant to qualify as a
CCO.
(2) If an
applicant and HCE disagree about whether the HCE is necessary for the
successful award of a contract to the applicant as a CCO, the applicant or HCE
may request the Authority to review the issue.
(3) If the Authority determines the HCE is
not necessary for the applicant's award of a contract, the process described in
this rule does not apply.
(4) If
the Authority determines or the parties agree the HCE is necessary for the
applicant's award of a contract, the following applies:
(a) The HCE and the applicant shall
participate in good faith contract negotiations. The parties shall take the
following actions in an attempt to reach a good faith resolution:
(A) The applicant shall provide a written
offer of terms and conditions to the HCE. The HCE shall explain the area of
disagreement to the applicant;
(B)
The applicant's or HCE's chief financial officer, chief executive officer, or
an individual authorized to make decisions on behalf of the HCE or applicant
shall have at least one face-to-face meeting in a good faith effort to resolve
the disagreement.
(b) The
applicant or HCE may request the Authority to provide technical assistance. The
Authority also may offer technical assistance, with or without a request. The
Authority's technical assistance is limited to clarifying the CCO contracting
process, criteria, and other program requirements.
(5) Pursuant to ORS
414.635, if the applicant and
HCE cannot reach agreement on contract terms within 10 calendar days of the
face-to-face meeting, either party may request arbitration. The requesting
party shall notify the other party in writing to initiate a referral to an
independent third-party arbitrator for an HCE's refusal to contract with the
CCO or the termination, extension, or renewal of a HCE's contract with a CCO.
The party initiating the referral shall provide a copy of the notification to
the Authority.
(6) After
notification that one party-initiated arbitration, the parties shall attempt to
agree upon the selection of the arbitrator and complete the paperwork required
to secure the arbitrator's services. If the parties are unable to agree, each
party shall appoint an arbitrator, and these arbitrators shall select the final
arbitrator.
(7) The parties shall
pay for all arbitration costs. In consideration of potentially varied financial
resources between the parties, which may pose a barrier to the use of this
process, the parties may ask the arbitrator to allocate costs between the
parties based on ability to pay.
(8) Within 10 calendar days of a referral to
an arbitrator, the applicant and HCE shall submit to each other and to the
arbitrator the following:
(a) The most
reasonable contract offers; or
(b)
The HCE's statement that a contract is not desirable and an explanation of why
this is reasonable.
(9)
Within 10 calendar days of receiving the other party's offer or the HCE's
statement that a contract is not desirable, each party shall submit to the
arbitrator and the other party the advocacy briefs regarding whether the HCE is
reasonably or unreasonably refusing to contract with the applicant.
(10) The arbitrator shall apply the following
standards when making a determination about whether an HCE reasonably or
unreasonably refused to contract with the applicant:
(a) An HCE may reasonably refuse to contract
when an applicant's reimbursement to an HCE for a health service is below the
reasonable cost to provide the service. The arbitrator shall apply federal or
state statutes or regulations that establish specific reimbursements, such as
payments to federally qualified health centers, rural health centers, and
tribal health centers; and
(b) An
HCE may reasonably refuse to contract if that refusal is justified in fact or
by circumstances, taking into consideration the health system transformation
legislative policies. Facts or circumstances outlining what is a reasonable or
unreasonable refusal to contract include, but are not limited to:
(A) Whether contracting with the applicant
would impose demands that the HCE cannot reasonably meet without significant
negative impact on HCE costs, obligations, or structure while considering the
proposed reimbursement arrangement or other CCO requirements. Some of the
requirements include:
(i) Use of electronic
health records;
(ii) Service
delivery requirements, or
(iii)
Quality or performance requirements.
(B) Whether the HCE's refusal affects access
to covered services in the applicant's community. This factor alone cannot
result in a finding that the refusal to contract is unreasonable; however, the
HCE and applicant shall make a good faith effort to work out differences in
order to achieve beneficial community objectives and health system
transformation policy objectives;
(C) Whether the HCE has entered into a
binding obligation to participate in the network of a different CCO or
applicant and that participation significantly reduces the HCE's capacity to
contract with the applicant.
(11) The following outlines the arbitrator
determination and the parties' final opportunity to settle:
(a) The arbitrator shall evaluate the final
offers or statement of refusal to contract and the advocacy briefs from each
party and issue a determination within 15 calendar days of the receipt of the
parties' information;
(b) The
arbitrator shall provide the determination to the parties. The arbitrator and
the parties may not disclose the determination to the Authority for 10 calendar
days to allow the parties an opportunity to resolve the issue themselves. If
the parties resolve the issue no later than the end of the tenth day, the
arbitrator may not release the determination to the Authority;
(c) If the parties have not reached an
agreement after 10 calendar days, the arbitrator shall provide its decision to
the Authority. After submission to the Authority, the arbitrator's
determination becomes a public record, subject to protection of trade secret
information if identified by one of the parties prior to the arbitrator's
submission of the determination.
(12) If the parties cannot agree, the
Authority shall evaluate the arbitrator's determination and may take the
following actions:
(a) The Authority may award
a contract to an applicant if the arbitrator determined the applicant made a
reasonable attempt to contract with the HCE or the HCE's refusal to contract
was unreasonable;
(b) The Authority
may refuse to award a contract to an applicant when the arbitrator determined
the applicant did not reasonably attempt to contract with the HCE or the HCE's
refusal to contract was reasonable, and the Authority determines that
participation from the HCE remains necessary for applicant's award of a
contract as a CCO;
(c) The
Authority may not pay fee-for-service reimbursements to an HCE if the
arbitrator determined the HCE unreasonably refused to contract with the
applicant. This applies to health services available through a CCO;
(d) In any circumstance within the scope of
this rule when the parties have failed to agree, the current statutes regarding
reimbursement to non-participating providers shall apply to CCOs that hold
contracts with OHA and the HCE, consistent with ORS
414.743 for hospitals and
consistent with Authority rules for other providers.
(13) To be qualified to resolve disputes
under this rule, the arbitrator shall:
(a) Be
a knowledgeable and experienced arbitrator;
(b) Be familiar with health care provider
contracting matters;
(c) Be
familiar with health system transformation; and
(d) Follow the terms and conditions specified
in this rule for the arbitration process.
Notes
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 413.042, 414.615, 414.625, 414.635 & 414.651
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 414.610 - 414.685
The following state regulations pages link to this page.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.