(1) Tennessee water
quality standards shall consist of the General Water Quality Criteria and the
Antidegradation Statement found in Chapter 0400-40-03, and the Use
Classifications for Surface Waters found in Chapter 0400-40-04.
(2) Waters have many uses which in the public
interest are reasonable and necessary. Such uses include: sources of water
supply for domestic and industrial purposes; propagation and maintenance of
fish and other aquatic life; recreation in and on the waters including the safe
consumption of fish and shellfish; livestock watering and irrigation;
navigation; generation of power; propagation and maintenance of wildlife; and
the enjoyment of scenic and aesthetic qualities of waters.
(3) The rigid application of uniform water
quality is not desirable or reasonable because of the varying uses of such
waters. The assimilative capacity of a stream for sewage and waste varies
depending upon various factors and including the following: volume of flow,
depth of channel, the presence of falls or rapids, rate of flow, temperature,
natural characteristics, and the nature of the stream.
(4) In order to permit the reasonable and
necessary uses of the waters of the state, existing pollution should be
corrected as rapidly as practicable, and future pollution prevented through the
level of treatment technology applicable to a specific source or that greater
level of technology necessary to meet water quality standards; i.e., modeling
and stream survey assessments, treatment plants or other control
measures.
(5) Since all streams are
classified for more than one use, the most stringent criteria will be
applicable.
(6) Waters identified
as wet weather conveyances according to the definition found in Rule
0400-40-03-.04, shall
be protective of humans and wildlife that may come in contact with them and
shall not adversely affect the quality of downstream waters. Applicable water
quality standards will be maintained downstream of wet weather
conveyances.
(7) Where general
water quality criteria are applied on a regional, ecoregional, or
subecoregional basis, these criteria will be considered to apply to a stream if
eighty percent (80%) of its watershed or catchment is contained within the unit
upon which the criterion is based.
(8) All fish and aquatic life metals criteria
are expressed as total recoverable, except cadmium, copper, lead, nickel,
silver, and zinc which are expressed as dissolved. Translators will be used to
convert the dissolved fraction into a total recoverable permit limit. One of
three approaches to metals translation will be used:
(1) translator is the same as the conversion
factor,
(2) translator is based on
relationships derived from STORET data,
(3) a site-specific translator is developed.
Where available, a site-specific translator is preferred. For assessing whether
criteria for cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc are exceeded by
ambient water quality conditions, the dissolved criteria will also be
translated in order to allow direct comparison to the ambient data, if total
recoverable. The Metals Translator: Guidance for Calculating a Total
Recoverable Permit Limit From a Dissolved Criteria (EPA-823-B-96-007) may be
referenced in applying this provision.
(9) Site-specific numeric criteria studies
may be conducted on any appropriate fish and aquatic life criteria criterion.
(a) Site-specific criteria studies based on a
Water Effects Ratio (WER) calculated from the documented toxicity of a
parameter in the stream in which it will be introduced may supersede the
adopted criteria at a site. The Division shall approve a site-specific
criterion for metals developed by others provided that the WER methodology
[Interim Guidance on Determination and Use of Water-effect Ratios for Metals
(EPA-823-B-94-001)] or the Streamlined Water-effects Ratio Procedure for
Discharges of Copper (EPA-822-R-01-001) is used, both the study plan and
results are approved by the Department, and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has concurred with the final site specific criterion
value(s).
(b) Any site specific
criterion for other toxics based on methodologies other than the above-listed
methodologies which recalculate specific criterion, such as the Resident
Species Method or the Recalculation Method or the Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) for
copper, must be adopted as a revision to Tennessee water quality standards into
this chapter, and following EPA approval, can be used for Clean Water Act
purposes.
References on this subject include, but are not limited to:
Technical Support Document for Water Quality-based Toxics Control (EPA -
505/2-90-001); Technical Guidance Manual for Performing Waste Load Allocations:
Book VIII (EPA/600/6-85/002a/002b/002c); MinteqA2, An Equilibrium Metal
Speciation Model (EPA/600/3-87/012); Water Quality Standards Handbook, Second
Edition (EPA-823-B-93-002); Interim Guidance on Determination and Use of
Water-effect Ratios for Metals (EPA-823-B-94-001).
(10) Interpretation and application of
narrative criteria shall be based on available scientific literature and EPA
guidance and regulations.