Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1200-03-18-.87 - QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES FOR CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS (CEMS)
(1) Each owner or
operator of a CEMS shall develop and implement a CEMS QC program. At a minimum,
each QC program shall include written procedures that describe in detail
step-by-step procedures and operations for each of the following:
(a) Initial and routine periodic calibration
of the CEMS.
(b) Calibration drift
(CD) determination and adjustment of the CEMS.
(c) Preventative maintenance of the CEMS
(including spare parts inventory).
(d) Data recording, calculations, and
reporting.
(e) Accuracy audit
procedures including sampling and analysis methods.
(f) Program of corrective action for
malfunctioning CEMS.
(2)
Out-of-control conditions are as follows:
(a)
If either the zero (or low-level) or high-level CD exceeds twice the applicable
drift specification in 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix B, as of July 1, 1991, for
five consecutive daily periods, the CEMS is out-of-control.
(b) If either the zero (or low-level) or
high-level CD exceeds four times the applicable drift specification in 40
C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix B, as of July 1, 1991, during any CD check, the CEMS
is out-of-control.
(c) If the CEMS
fails a performance audit (PA), the CEMS is out-of-control, and the owner or
operator shall take necessary corrective action to eliminate the problem.
Following the corrective action, the source owner or operator shall reconduct
the appropriate failed portion of the audit and other applicable portions to
determine whether the monitoring system is operating properly and within
specifications. Monitoring data obtained during any out-of-control period may
not be used for compliance determination or to meet any data capture
requirements; however, the data can be used for identifying periods when there
has been a failure to meet quality assurance/quality control
criteria.
(3)
Out-of-control time periods determination shall be as follows:
(a) The beginning of the out-of-control
period is:
1. The time corresponding to the
completion of the fifth consecutive daily CD check with CD in excess of two
times the allowable limit, or
2.
The time corresponding to completion of the daily CD check preceding the daily
CD check that results in a CD in excess of four times the allowable
limit.
(b) The end of
the out-of-control period is the time corresponding to the completion of the CD
check following corrective action that results in the CD's at both the zero (or
low-level) and high-level measurement points being within the corresponding
allowable CD limit (i.e., either two times or four times the allowable limit in
40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix B, as of July 1, 1991).
(c) If the CEMS failed a PA, the beginning of
the out-of-control period is the time corresponding to the completion of the
failed audit test. The end of the out-of-control period is the time
corresponding to a successful retest of the PA sample.
(4) The owner or operator shall keep the QC
procedure described in Paragraph (1) of this rule in a readily accessible
location for at least 3 years and shall make the procedure available to the
Technical Secretary upon request.
(5) Upon request, the owner or operator shall
submit to the Technical Secretary a copy of all information and records
documenting out-of-control periods including beginning and end dates and
descriptions of corrective actions taken.
(6) Use of an adaptation to any of the
requirements specified in this rule shall be approved by the Technical
Secretary and EPA case-by-case. An owner or operator shall submit sufficient
documentation for the Technical Secretary and EPA to find that the specified
requirements are inappropriate and that the proposed adaptation is
appropriate.
Notes
Authority: T.C.A. ยงยง 4-5-202 and 68-201-105.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.