12 Va. Admin. Code § 5-20-80 - Elements of committee review process
A. No human research shall be conducted or
authorized by a person, institution, or agency unless a research review
committee has reviewed and approved the proposed human research project giving
consideration to:
1. The adequacy of the
description of the potential benefits and risks involved and the adequacy of
the methodology of the human research;
2. The degree of the risk and, if the human
research is nontherapeutic, whether it presents greater than minimal
risk;
3. Whether the rights and
welfare of the human subjects involved are adequately protected;
4. Whether the risks to the human subjects
are outweighed by the potential benefits to them;
5. Whether the risks to subjects are
minimized (i) by using procedures that are consistent with sound human research
design and that do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risk and (ii) whenever
appropriate, by using currently accepted procedures for diagnostic or treatment
purposes;
6. Whether additional
safeguards have been included in the study to protect the rights and welfare of
the subjects when some or all of the subjects are likely to be incapable of
providing informed consent or are otherwise vulnerable to coercion or undue
inducement , such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled
persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons;
7. Whether the informed consent is to be
obtained by methods that are adequate and appropriate and whether the written
consent form is adequate and appropriate in both content and language for the
particular human research and for the particular subjects of the human
research;
8. Whether the persons
proposing to supervise or conduct the particular human research are
appropriately competent and qualified;
9. Whether criteria for selection of subjects
are equitable; and
10. Whether the
human research conforms with other requirements of the department, where
applicable.
B. The
committee shall consider a research proposal within 45 days after its
submission to the committee. In order for the research proposal to be approved,
it shall receive the approval of a majority of the committee members present at
a meeting for which a quorum exists. A committee shall notify investigators and
the institution in writing of its decision to approve or disapprove the
research proposal or of modifications required to secure committee
approval.
C. During the committee
review of research proposals, no personal identifiers of present or potential
subjects shall be stated.
D. The
committee shall develop a written description of the procedure to be followed
when a subject has a complaint about a research project in which he is
participating or has participated.
E. Any subject who has a complaint about a
research project in which he is participating or has participated shall be
referred to the committee to determine if there has been a violation of the
protocol.
F. The committee shall
have the authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not
being conducted in accordance with the committee requirements or that has been
associated with unexpected serious harm to the subjects. Any suspension or
termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the
committee's action and shall be reported promptly to the investigator,
appropriate institutional officials, the department or agency head, and the
commissioner.
G. The chair of the
committee shall provide a written report to the head of the institution of any
violation of the human research protocol that led the committee to suspend or
terminate the human research.
H.
The committee shall require reports from approved research projects at least
annually to ensure conformity with the approved proposal. The frequency of such
reports shall be consistent with the nature and degree of risk of each research
project. The committee shall also require a report at the conclusion of the
research project.
I. The committee
shall ensure compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (42 USC § 1320d et seq.), if applicable, and
federal and state regulations regarding the use and disclosure of PHI created
for human research. In particular, authorization shall be obtained for the use
and disclosure of PHI created for the purpose of human research, except as
otherwise permitted by 45
CFR 164.512(i).
J. When cooperating institutions conduct some
or all of the human research involving some or all of the subjects of the human
research, each cooperating institution shall be responsible for safeguarding
the rights and welfare of the subjects and for complying with this chapter,
provided however, in complying with this chapter, institutions may enter into
joint review, rely upon the review of another qualified committee, or come to
similar agreements aimed at avoiding duplication of effort. Any such agreement
shall be in writing and designate a lead institution, which shall be the
institution responsible for reporting and handling any possible misconduct in
the human research. Such agreements shall be entered into by the committee
chair with the approval of a majority of the committee members. If an
institution or agency does not have a research review committee, such
agreements shall be approved and entered into by the chief executive officer of
the institution or his designee.
Notes
Statutory Authority: §§ 32.1-12 and 32.1-12.1 of the Code of Virginia.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.