Wash. Admin. Code § 108-40-110 - Revocation of charter school contract
(1)
The commission may revoke a school's charter contract at any time that it
determines that the school failed to comply with the Charter Schools Act or:
(a) Committed a material and substantial
violation of any of the terms, conditions, standards, or procedures required
under this chapter or the charter contract;
(b) Failed to meet or make sufficient
progress toward the performance expectations set forth in the charter
contract;
(c) Failed to meet
generally accepted standards of fiscal management; or
(d) Substantially violated any material
provision of law from which the charter school is not exempt.
(2) If the commission determines
that a school's charter contract should be revoked, the commission will notify
the school, in writing, of the determination and the associated reasons. The
school may submit a written response that must be received by the commission
within thirty days of issuance of the notice.
(3) The commission, or a person designated by
the commission, will review the notice, response, and any supporting
information and issue a draft resolution to revoke or not revoke the school's
charter contract and any conditions that are recommended if the school's
contract is not to be revoked. The draft resolution will be sent to the
school.
(4) The school may request
an opportunity to respond to a draft resolution recommending revocation. This
request must be sent to the commission's executive director, or designee,
within twenty days of issuance of the draft resolution. Failure to make this
request within twenty days acts as a waiver rendering the draft resolution
final.
(5) If a school requests an
opportunity to respond, the commission will designate an individual or
individuals to preside over a recorded public proceeding at which the school
may:
(a) Submit a written response explaining
why it believes that its charter contract should not be revoked;
(b) Submit documents and give testimony
opposing the revocation of the charter contract;
(c) Call witnesses on its behalf;
and
(d) Be represented by
counsel.
(6) The
commission may also, through staff or counsel, present documents, witnesses
and/or testimony to support the revocation at the public proceeding.
(7) The presiding officer(s) shall regulate
the course of the public proceeding and, in the discretion of the presiding
officer(s), may impose reasonable limits on the conduct of the public
proceeding including, but not limited to, limitations on the length of time
that the school and commission has to present documents and evidence. The
presiding officer(s) may issue deadlines and other requirements that the
presiding officer(s) deems necessary for the orderly conduct of the proceeding.
Unless they conflict with the Charter School Act, and commission's rules, the
provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW shall govern these proceedings.
(8) Within no more than thirty days of the
public proceeding, the presiding officer(s) shall make a written recommendation
to the commission regarding whether the revocation decision should stand or
whether it should be altered in some manner. This recommendation will be
transmitted to the commission, the school, and posted on the commission's web
site.
(9) The commission will,
after a reasonable period for deliberation, consider the recommendation of the
presiding officer(s) as well as any other evidence or documentation submitted
during the revocation process, and make a final determination. The commission's
final determination shall be in the form of a resolution that clearly states
the reasons for the revocation or decision not to revoke.
(10) Within ten days of issuing this
resolution, the commission will submit a report of action to the school, the
superintendent of public instruction, and the state board of education. The
resolution will be attached to the report of action and will set forth the
action taken, reasons for the decision, and assurances of compliance with the
commission's renewal/nonrenewal procedures.
(11) Nothing within these rules prevents the
commission from engaging in contingency planning in initiating the termination
protocol.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.