Wash. Admin. Code § 132B-125-430 - Evidence
The introduction and consideration of evidence during the hearing is subject to the following procedures and restrictions:
(1)
Relevance: The committee
chair shall review all questions for relevance and shall explain on the record
their reasons for excluding any question based on lack of relevance.
(2) Relevance means that information elicited
by the question makes facts in dispute more or less likely to be
true.
(3) Questions or evidence
about a complainant's sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior are not
relevant and must be excluded, unless such question or evidence:
(a) Is asked or offered to prove someone
other than the respondent committed the alleged misconduct; or
(b) Concerns specific incidents of prior
sexual behavior between the complainant and the respondent, which are asked or
offered on the issue of consent.
(4)
No negative inference: The
committee may not make an inference regarding responsibility solely on a
witness's or party's absence from the hearing or refusal to answer
questions.
(5)
Privileged
evidence: The committee shall not consider legally privileged
information unless the holder has effectively waived the privilege. Privileged
information includes, but is not limited to, information protected by the
following:
(a) Spousal/domestic partner
privilege;
(b) Attorney-client and
attorney work product privileges;
(c) Privileges applicable to members of the
clergy and priests;
(d) Privileges
applicable to medical providers, mental health therapists, and
counselors;
(e) Privileges
applicable to sexual assault and domestic violence advocates; and
(f) Other legal privileges identified in
RCW
5.60.060 Who is disqualified-Privileged
communications.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.