(1)
Applicability. New MSWLF units and lateral expansions must be constructed in
accordance with the requirements under subsection (2) of this section. Existing
MSWLF units are not subject to this section. Waste placement in existing units
must be consistent with past operating practices or modified practices to
ensure good management, including operating plans approved under chapter
173-304 WAC.
(2) New MSWLF units
and lateral expansions must be constructed:
(a) With a composite liner as defined in
subsection (3) of this section and a leachate collection system that is
designed and constructed to maintain less than a 1 foot (30 cm) depth of
leachate over the liner and less than a 2-foot depth over the leachate pump
sump area; or
(b) In accordance
with an alternative design approved by the jurisdictional health department
with the department's written consent. Alternative designs must ensure that the
concentration values listed in Table 1 of this section and the criteria in the
water quality standards for groundwaters of the state of Washington, chapter
173-200 WAC, will not be exceeded in the hydrostratigraphic unit(s) identified
in the hydrogeologic characterization/report at the relevant point of
compliance as specified during the permitting process in WAC
173-351-700 or through the permit
modification process of WAC
173-351-720(6).
Alternative designs must also sufficiently control methane to meet the criteria
in WAC
173-351-200(4)(a).
(3) For the purpose of this
section, "composite liner" means a system consisting of two components; the
upper component must consist of a minimum of 60 mil thickness high density
polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane. The lower component must consist of at least a
two-foot (60 cm) layer of compacted soil with a hydraulic conductivity of no
more than 1X10-7 cm/sec. The geomembrane must be
installed in direct and uniform contact with the compacted soil component.
Thinner geomembranes of other than high density polyethylene may be used
provided that a demonstration can be made that the alternative has equivalent
mechanical strength, permeability, chemical resistance and other factors under
conditions of construction and use. Minimum thickness of geomembranes other
than high density polyethylene must be 30 mils.
(4) When demonstrating that a proposed
alternative design meets the standards of this section, the owner or operator
may use:
(a) Existing information such as
vadose zone, groundwater monitoring, or leachate characterization that has
previously been conducted at the facility;
(b) Contaminant transport modeling in
accordance with the requirements of WAC
173-351-480; and/or
(c) Other information determined as
appropriate and relevant by the jurisdictional health department.
(5) When approving an alternative
design, the jurisdictional health department must consider at least the
following factors:
(a) The hydrogeologic
characteristics of the facility and surrounding land;
(b) The climatic factors of the area;
and
(c) The volume, physical and
chemical characteristics of the leachate.
(6) The relevant point of compliance approved
during the permitting process in WAC
173-351-700 or through the permit
modification process of WAC
173-351-720(6),
must be no more than one hundred fifty meters (four hundred ninety-two feet)
from the waste management unit boundary and must be located on land owned by
the owner of the MSWLF unit. In approving the relevant point of compliance the
jurisdictional health department must consider at least the following factors:
(a) The hydrogeologic characteristics of the
facility and surrounding land;
(b)
The volume, and physical/chemical characteristics of the leachate;
(c) The quantity and quality, and direction
of flow of groundwater;
(d) The
proximity and withdrawal rate of the groundwater users;
(e) The availability of alternative drinking
water supplies;
(f) The existing
quality of the groundwater, including other sources of contamination and their
cumulative impacts on the groundwater, and whether the groundwater is currently
used or reasonably expected to be used for drinking water;
(g) Public health, safety, and welfare
effects; and
(h) Practical
capability of the owner or operator.
(7) Liner separation from groundwater. New
MSWLF units and lateral expansions may not be designed such that the bottom of
the lowest liner component is any less than ten feet (three meters) above the
seasonal high level of groundwater, unless a demonstration can be made during
the permit process of WAC
173-351-700 or through the permit
modification process of WAC
173-351-720(6)
that a hydraulic gradient control system, or the equivalent, can be installed
which prevents the controlled seasonal high level of groundwater in the
identified water-bearing unit from contacting the bottom of the lowest liner
component. For the purposes of this section, groundwater includes any
water-bearing unit that is horizontally and vertically extensive, hydraulically
recharged and volumetrically significant as to harm or endanger the integrity
of the liner at any time. The owner or operator must place the demonstration in
the application for a permit under WAC
173-351-700 or through the permit
modification process of WAC
173-351-720(6).
This demonstration must include:
(a) A
hydrogeologic report required in WAC
173-351-490 including a
discussion showing the effects from subsoil settlement, changes in surrounding
land uses affecting groundwater levels, liner leakage or other impacts will not
bring any hydrostratigraphic unit in contact with the bottom of the lowest
liner during the active life, closure, post-closure, and upon completion of
post-closure care of the MSWLF unit;
(b) Any available ground/surface water
quality data for aquifers, springs, or streams in direct hydrologic contact
with landfill's active area;
(c) A
showing that any gradient-control discharges to groundwater will not adversely
impact existing groundwater/surface water users or the instream flow of surface
waters in direct hydrologic contact or continuity with the landfill's hydraulic
gradient control system;
(d)
Conceptual engineering drawings of the proposed MSWLF unit and discussion as to
how the hydraulic gradient control system will not affect the structural
integrity nor performance of the liner during the active life, closure,
post-closure, and upon completion of post-closure care of the MSWLF
unit;
(e) Design specifications for
the proposed ground and surface water monitoring systems;
(f) A discussion of the potential impacts
from the gradient control system on the capability of collecting groundwater
samples that represent the quality of groundwater passing the relevant point of
compliance; and
(g) Preliminary
engineering drawings of the hydraulic gradient control system.
TABLE 1
|
CHEMICAL
|
Maximum
Concentration (mg/l)
|
|
ARSENIC
|
0.00005
|
|
BARIUM
|
1.0
|
|
BENZENE
|
0.001
|
|
CADMIUM
|
0.005
|
|
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
|
0.0003
|
|
CHROMIUM (HEXAVALENT)
|
0.05
|
|
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXY ACETIC ACID
|
0.07
|
|
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
|
0.004
|
|
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
|
0.0005
|
|
1,1 DICHLOROETHYLENE
|
0.007
|
|
ENDRIN
|
0.0002
|
|
FLUORIDE
|
4
|
|
LINDANE
|
0.00006
|
|
LEAD
|
0.015
|
|
MERCURY
|
0.002
|
|
METHOXYCHLOR
|
0.04
|
|
NITRATE
|
10
|
|
SELENIUM
|
0.01
|
|
SILVER
|
0.05
|
|
TOXAPHENE
|
0.00008
|
|
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
|
0.20
|
|
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
|
0.003
|
|
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY ACETIC ACID
|
0.01
|
|
VINYL CHLORIDE
|
0.00002
|