1.0
Background on OTM-51
This method provides procedures for use of unmanned aerial
systems (UAS) to perform surface emissions monitoring for MSW landfills. This
method was submitted by Sniffer Robotics, LLC to EPA's Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards Measurement Technology group and was included into the
Other Test Method (OTM) category on EPA's Air Emission Measurement Center
website on 12/15/2022.
OTM-51 is approved for use at MSW landfills for several federal
regulations and is approved for use under this chapter, subject to the caveats
and additional information specified in section 11.0 of this appendix.
The following application of OTM-51 is only approved for the
purpose of compliance with the surface emission monitoring requirements of this
chapter, and does not supersede any approved methods, requirements, or
regulations regarding the use of OTM-51 for other federal, state, and local
laws or regulations.
2.0
Scope and Application
Scope: This method is an alternative test method for
determining compliance with the surface methane operational standard for
landfills in lieu of procedures set forth pursuant to WAC 173-408-120
(1)(a).
Analytes
|
Analyte
|
CAS Number
|
|
Methane (CH4)
|
74-82-8
|
3.0
Summary of Method
This alternative test method seeks to replicate, to the
greatest extent possible, EPA Method 21, but automates surface emission
monitoring by utilizing a methane detection payload on an "unmanned aerial
system (UAS)," as defined in WAC
173-408-020, coupled with a
ground level to UAS sampling system. The methane detector payload includes a
hose and custom nozzle design that, when carried by the UAS, places the nozzle
inlet within 5-10 cm of the ground. The UAS transmits the geolocated methane
readings to the operator via a wireless communication system. The UAS is used
to sample large areas for "increased meter readings," as defined in WAC
173-408-020, each of which are
then inspected using EPA Reference Method 21.
4.0
Equipment and Supplies
(a) The methane detection payload shall have
the following specifications:
(i) The methane
detection payload shall collect and respond to methane in the air samples;
standoff or remote detection technologies are not applicable. Detector types
that may meet this requirement include, but are not limited to, flame
ionization, nondispersive infrared absorption (NDIR) and tunable diode laser
absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS).
(ii) The methane detection payload shall be
capable of measuring methane in the range from zero through the increased meter
reading up to and above the exceedance limit of 500 ppm specified in this
chapter.
(iii) The scale of the
methane detection payload shall be readable to ±2.5 percent of the increased
meter reading level of 200 ppm methane.
(iv) The methane detection payload shall be
equipped with a pump that provides the detector a constant sample flow rate.
The nominal sample flow rate, as measured at the sample probe nozzle, shall be
at least 0.5 l/min when the probe is fitted with the full impedance stack of
tubing, filters, and nozzle.
(v)
The methane detection payload shall have a known instrument-only response time.
Instrument-only response time shall be measured for the methane detection
instrument prior to being placed into service but does not have to be repeated
at subsequent intervals. Instrument-only response time shall be measured by
measuring the T90 response time for a minimum of five unique tube lengths less
than 10m, fitting a linear regression to the measured T90 response times and
recording they-intercept as the instrument only response time if the
r2 of the linear regression is greater than
0.95.
(b) The ground
level sampling system shall have the following specifications:
(i) The ground level sampling system shall be
equipped with a single nozzle with inside diameter such that the air speed into
the nozzle (per the nominal sample flow rate defined in section 4.0(a)(iv) of
this appendix) is at least 0.3 m/s.
(ii) The ground level sampling system shall
include a hose of sufficient length to drag the nozzle on the ground such that
the nozzle is in fluid communication with the methane detection
payload.
(iii) Before putting the
ground level sampling system into service, determine the "nozzle offset
distance," as defined in WAC
173-408-020. If the tube length
of the ground sampling density changes or the planned AGL for the ground level
sampling system changes, repeat measurements to determine the nozzle offset
distance.
(c) The UAS
shall have the following specifications:
(i)
The UAS shall carry the methane detection payload and the ground level sampling
system and use an automated, real-time measurement and control system to fly at
a constant AGL of ±1 meter.
(ii)
The UAS shall include a data acquisition system to record both timestamped
drone position (GPS coordinates with an accuracy of no worse than ±2 meters)
and methane concentration. The data shall be logged at a frequency of at least
the instrument-only response time per section 4.0(a)(v) of this
appendix.
(iii) The UAS shall have
a gimbaled camera that is remotely viewable and controllable by a remote
operator in near real-time. The camera and display shall have high enough
resolution for the operator to discern indicators of elevated concentrations of
landfill gas, including distressed vegetation, cracks or seeps in the cover and
cover penetrations from the defined flight AGL. Pictures taken shall be
georeferenced via metadata or similar to the GPS accuracy of ±2
meters.
(iv) The UAS shall be in
communication with an operator display that shows the methane concentration, as
measured by the methane detection payload.
(v) If automated flight plans are used to
control the path of the UAS, the UAS shall be controllable by the remote
operator to deviate from said flight plans to inspect areas where visual
observations indicate potential elevated concentrations of landfill gas, such
as distressed vegetation, cracks, or seeps in the cover and cover
penetrations.
(vi) The UAS shall be
equipped with a method to control the forward speed to the value determined to
meet the limit under section 7.0 of this appendix.
5.0
Reagents and
Standards
(a) Two gas mixtures are
required for methane detection payload calibration and performance evaluation:
(i) Zero gas. Air, less than 10 parts per
million by volume (ppmv) methane.
(ii) Methane calibration gas. Obtain a known
standard in air at a concentration approximately equal to the 500 ppm above
background operational limit specified in the regulation.
(b) Cylinder gases: If cylinder calibration
gas mixtures are used, they must be analyzed and certified by the manufacturer
to be within two percent accuracy, and a shelf life must be specified. Cylinder
standards must be either reanalyzed or replaced at the end of the specified
shelf life.
6.0
Sample Collection, Preservation, Storage, and Transport
(a) Methane detection payload performance
evaluation: Assemble and start up the methane detection payload according to
the manufacturer's instructions for recommended warm-up period and preliminary
adjustments.
(b) Calibration
precision: The calibration precision test shall be completed prior to placing
the methane detection payload into service and at subsequent three-month
intervals or at the next use, whichever is first.
(i) Make a total of three measurements of
both the zero and the methane calibration gas by alternately introducing them
where the measurement is collected via the ground level sampling system with
all filters, the full tube length, and nozzle present. The introduction of the
gas must be done such to not change the flow rate of the system or to
pressurize the measurement cell. Record the meter readings.
(ii) Calculate the average algebraic
difference between the meter readings and the known value. Divide this average
difference by the known calibration value and multiply by 100 to express the
resulting calibration precision as a percentage.
(iii) The calibration precision shall be
equal to or less than 10.0 percent of the calibration gas value.
(c) Response time: The response
time test shall be completed prior to placing the methane detection payload and
ground level sampling system into service and at subsequent three-month
intervals or at the next use, whichever is first. If a modification to the
sample pumping system or flow configuration is made that would change the
response time, a new test is required before further use.
(i) Introduce zero gas into the nozzle of the
ground level sampling system. When the meter reading has stabilized, switch
quickly to the specified calibration gas. After switching, measure the time
required to attain 90 percent of the final stable reading. Perform this test
sequence three times and record the results. Calculate the average response
time.
(ii) The response time shall
be equal to or less than 30 seconds. The instrument pump, ground level sampling
system with all filters, tubing, and nozzle lengths, which will be used during
testing shall all be in place during the response time determination.
(d) Nozzle offset distance: The
nozzle offset distance shall be measured prior to placing the methane detection
payload into service by recording the time between the UAS passing a known
point in space and the nozzle passing the same point in space at a known,
consistent speed, hose length and AGL. The horizontal offset distance is the
measured temporal offset of the UAS to the nozzle, multiplied by the known,
consistent speed.
(e) Offset
calculation: Derive the temporal offset from UAS GPS measurement to receipt of
quantified methane measurement for each combination of AGL and methane
detection payload configuration by adding the response time to the nozzle
offset distance divided by speed. Record this time offset for input to the data
acquisition system and offset the reported location of all methane measurements
along the actual traversed path by this offset (i.e., if the offset is "X"
seconds, the location of the measurement shall be reported as the location of
the UAS "X" seconds in the past).
(f) Flow rate: The flow rate test shall be
completed prior to placing the methane detection payload and ground level
sampling system into service and at subsequent three-month intervals or at the
next use, whichever is first. If a modification to the sample pumping system or
flow configuration is made that would change the flow rate, a new test is
required before further use. Measure the flow rate at the distal end of the
collection nozzle with a flow meter readable to at least 0.1 l/min per the flow
meter manufacturer's specification. Record the flow rate; the flow rate shall
be greater than 0.5 l/min.
(g)
Instrument calibration: Calibrate the methane detection pay-load according to
section 10.0 of this appendix.
7.0
Surface Emissions Monitoring via
UAS and Follow-up Ground-based Surveys
(a) Set the UAS terrain following system to
fly at the constant AGL for the ground level sampling system characterized in
section 4.0(b)(ii) of this appendix. Ensure the remote operator can control the
gimbaled camera on the UAS and that the resolution is adequate to make visual
observations that indicate elevated concentrations of landfill gas, such as
distressed vegetation and cracks or seeps in the cover and cover
penetrations.
(b) Take off and fly
the UAS (at the predefined constant AGL) at a speed such that the
instrument-only response time multiplied by the forward flight speed does not
exceed four meters along a pattern that traverses the landfill at 25-ft
intervals. The aggregation of all the surface sampling traverses shall include
the perimeter of the collection area, and all locations where visual
observations from the gim-baled camera or aerial imagery taken within 120 days
indicate elevated concentrations of landfill gas, such as distressed vegetation
and cracks or seeps in the cover.
(i) Surface
sampling traverses in accordance with this test method shall only occur during
average barometric pressure conditions to the extent possible.
(ii) Surface sampling traverses in accordance
with this test method must be terminated when the average wind speed exceeds
five miles per hour, or the instantaneous wind speed exceeds 10 miles per hour.
Surface testing can continue when the average wind speed is five miles per hour
or less. The department or local authority may approve alternatives to this
wind speed surface testing termination for MSW landfills consistently having
measured winds in excess of these specified limits.
(iii) Surface sampling traverses in
accordance with this test method must be conducted only when there has been no
measurable precipitation in the preceding 72 hours. The department or local
authority may approve alternatives to this procedure for MSW landfills that
cannot meet the requirements of this subsection.
(c) During flight, take georeferenced
pictures from the UAS gimbaled camera of features that indicate elevated
concentrations of landfill gas, such as distressed vegetation and cracks or
seeps in the cover and cover penetrations. Inspect these locations per section
7.0(d) of this appendix.
(d)
Increased meter readings: If an increased meter reading is observed or recorded
by the UAS data acquisition system, refer to Section 8.3.1 of Method 21 to
survey the area of the GPS coordinate of the increased meter reading and the
area within a radius of at least 15 meters. While inspecting the increased
meter readings and traversing the landfill between said increased meter
readings, make visual observations to identify areas that indicate elevated
concentrations of landfill gas, such as distressed vegetation, cracks or seeps
in the cover and cover penetrations and inspect said areas as increased meter
readings.
(e) Cover penetrations:
In addition to conducting ground-based surveys where increased meter readings
were detected, refer to Section 8.3.1 of Method 21 to survey applicable cover
penetrations or openings within the landfill area.
(f) Monitoring route: All measurement points
compliant with the specifications of this alternative method shall be plotted
on a map that encompasses and includes the perimeter of waste. Any points that
deviate from this test method including, but not limited to, manual deviations
to the AGL that exceed ±1 meter, GPS accuracy worse than ±2 meters, presumed or
measured flow rate less than 0.5 l/min, ground sampling density worse than
25-ft intervals, etc. shall not be plotted. Any location on the map greater
than 15m from a measurement point shall be noted and justified (e.g., noted as
an active area, noted hazards that prevent inspection detail, etc.).
(g) Remonitoring: Refer to EPA Reference
Method 21 for remonitor-ing of previously identified exceedances.
8.0
Exceedances
(a) The owner or operator of a MSW landfill
must notify the department or local authority within two working days after all
corrective actions and remonitoring taken to address exceedances detected using
this method. The notification must include a description of the corrective
actions taken. The owner or operator of a MSW landfill may request alternative
compliance measures to replace the requirements of this subsection pursuant to
WAC
173-408-130.
(b) The owner or operator must record the
date, location, and value of each exceedance, along with retest dates and
results. The location of each exceedance must be clearly marked and identified
on a topographic map, at a minimum, of the MSW landfill, drawn to scale with
the location of both the grids and the gas collection system clearly
identified.
(c) Corrective action
must be taken by the owner or operator such as, but not limited to, cover
maintenance or repair, and well vacuum adjustments, and the location must be
remonitored within 10 calendar days of a measured exceedance.
(i) If the remonitoring of the location shows
a second exceedance, additional corrective action must be taken, and the
location must be remonitored again within 10 calendar days of the second
exceedance.
(ii) If the
remonitoring required by section 8.0(c)(i) of this appendix shows a third
exceedance, the owner or operator must install a new or replacement well, or an
alternative active methane control approved by the department or local
authority, as needed to achieve compliance no later than 120 calendar days
after detecting the third exceedance.
9.0
Quality Control
|
Section
|
Quality Control
Measure
|
Effect
|
|
6.0 (Calibration Precision)
|
Instrument calibration precision
check
|
Ensure precision and accuracy, respectively, of
instrument response to standard.
|
|
10.0
|
Instrument calibration
|
|
10.0
Calibration and Standardization
(a) Calibrate the methane detection payload
as follows: After the appropriate warm-up period and any internal zero
calibration procedure, introduce the calibration gas at the inlet of the ground
level sampling system to include all filter, tubing, and the nozzle. Per the
manufacturer's guidelines ensure the instrument readout corresponds to the
calibration gas value within 10.0 percent.
11.0
ALT-150 Compliance Letter
The use of OTM-51 for purposes of compliance with this chapter
is subject to the following limitations/caveats, as specified in the EPA's
ALT-150 letter (dated 12/15/2022):
(a)
Entities other than Sniffer Robotics, LLC must submit data comparing OTM-51 and
EPA Reference Method 21 to the department or local authority before this
alternative test method may be used in lieu of SEM test procedures specified by
WAC
173-408-120
(1)(a).
(b) Increased meter readings must be
documented as prescribed by OTM-51. When an exceedance of the operational
standard is identified, the location of the monitored exceedance must be
marked, and the location and concentration recorded as specified in section 8.0
of this appendix. When an increased meter reading is not identified as an
exceedance of the operational standard, there must be at a minimum a
traditional surface monitoring pattern either in a spiral or serpentine pattern
with three-meter intervals that covers a 30-meter radius from the increased
meter readings to confirm no exceedance of the operational standard.
(c) Affected landfills using OTM-51 must
notify the department or local authority before use of this alternative method
and notification must include a copy of this appendix.
(d) Landfills must include a copy of this
appendix and method with each report presenting SEM results using
OTM-51.
(e) Once an owner or
operator of a landfill chooses to use OTM-51, the landfill must continue to use
the alternative method in meeting the requirements of this chapter until the
owner or operator receives approval from the department or local authority to
return to the existing Method 21 or use of a new EPA-test method.