(1) Where a watershed analysis has been
completed and approved for a WAU under this chapter:
(a) Any landowner within the WAU may apply
for a multiyear permit to conduct forest practices according to the watershed
analysis prescriptions. This permit is not renewable if a reanalysis is found
necessary by the department under subsection (6) of this section and either the
reanalysis has not been completed and approved or the department has rescinded
the prescriptions.
(b) Nonmultiyear
forest practices applications and notifications submitted to the department
shall indicate whether an area of resource sensitivity will be affected and, if
so, which prescription the operator, timber owner, or forest landowners shall
use in conducting the forest practice in the area of resource
sensitivity;
(c) The department
shall assist operators, timber owners, and forest landowners in obtaining
governmental permits required for the prescription. See WAC
222-50-020 and
222-50-030;
(d) The department shall confirm that the
prescription selected under (a) and (b) of this subsection was one of the
prescriptions approved for the area of resource sensitivity under WAC
222-22-080 and shall require the
use of the prescription; and
(e)
The department shall not further condition forest practices applications and
notifications in an area of resource sensitivity in a WAU where the applicant
will use a prescription contained in the watershed analysis nor shall the
department further condition forest practices applications and notifications
outside an area of resource sensitivity in a WAU, except:
(i) For reasons other than the watershed
processes and fish, water, and capital improvements of the state or its
political subdivisions analyzed in the watershed analysis in the WAU;
or
(ii) To correct mapping errors,
misidentification of soils, landforms, vegetation, or stream features, or other
similar factual errors.
(2) Pending completion and approval of a
watershed analysis for a WAU, the department shall process forest practices
notifications and applications in accordance with the other chapters of this
title.
Processing and approval of applications and notifications shall
not be delayed by reason of review, approval, or appeal of a watershed
analysis.
(3) The board
encourages cooperative and voluntary monitoring. Evaluation of resource
conditions may be conducted by qualified specialists, analysts, field managers,
and qualified experts as determined under WAC
222-22-030. Subsequent watershed
analysis and monitoring recommendations in response to areas where recovery is
not occurring shall be conducted in accordance with this chapter.
(4) To keep watershed analyses current, the
department shall determine if and when a reanalysis of a watershed analysis is
necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the prescriptions applied under this
chapter to the WAU in providing for the protection and recovery of the
resource. The department shall determine which watershed analysis modules and
prescriptions need to be included in the reanalysis. Review and reanalysis
shall be conducted in accordance with this chapter and board manual section 11,
standard methodology for conducting watershed analysis, except that:
(a) The reanalysis may be conducted on areas
smaller than the entire WAU in the case of subsection (6)(a) of this section;
and
(b) The reanalysis shall be
conducted only on the areas affected in the case of subsection (6)(b) or (c) of
this section.
(5)
Entities with an interest in maintaining prescriptions the department has
identified for reanalysis are responsible for committing sufficient resources
to complete a reanalysis in addition to the available resources provided by the
department to administer the reanalysis process.
(6) Once a watershed analysis is completed
and approved on a WAU, the department shall conduct a review to determine if a
reanalysis is necessary, upon the earliest of the following to occur:
(a) Five years after the date the watershed
analysis is final, and every five years thereafter; or
(b) The occurrence of a natural disaster
having a material adverse effect on the resource characteristics of the WAU;
or
(c) Deterioration in the
condition of a resource characteristic in the WAU measured over a twelve-month
period or no improvement in a resource characteristic in fair or poor condition
in the WAU measured over a twelve-month period unless the department
determines, in cooperation with the departments of ecology and fish and
wildlife, affected Indian tribes, forest landowners, and the public, that a
longer period is reasonably necessary to allow the prescriptions selected to
produce improvement.
(7)
Once the department has determined that a reanalysis is necessary under
subsection (6) of this section:
(a) The
department shall notify the forest landowners in the WAU, the departments of
ecology and fish and wildlife, affected Indian tribes, relevant federal
agencies and local governmental entities, and the public.
(b) Prior to the start of the reanalysis, the
department shall determine and clearly delineate on a map the areas on which
the reanalysis is to be conducted.
(c) The department shall classify per WAC
222-16-050 proposed forest
practices within the mapped reanalysis area that would have been subject to
those prescriptions identified for reanalysis.
(d) The department shall determine if the
forest landowners in the WAU want to participate in the reanalysis and commit
sufficient resources to complete the reanalysis process in accordance with
subsection (5) of this section:
(i) If no
forest landowners in the WAU wish to participate and commit resources, then the
department may rescind the prescriptions it identified for the reanalysis after
conducting SEPA review. If the department rescinds prescriptions, it shall
notify the landowners in the WAU.
(ii) If a landowner wishes to participate and
commit resources, then the department in consultation with the departments of
ecology and fish and wildlife, affected Indian tribes, forest landowners, and
the public shall establish a timeline for the reanalysis. If the timeline for
completion is not being met, the department may adjust the timeline or, after
conducting SEPA review, rescind the prescriptions it identified for the
reanalysis. If the department rescinds prescriptions, it shall notify the
landowners in the WAU.
(e) Upon receiving recommendations from the
reanalysis, the department shall select prescriptions and approve or disapprove
the reanalysis in accordance with WAC
222-22-080.
(f) Reanalysis must be reviewed under SEPA on
a nonproject basis. See WAC
222-10-035.
(8) Regardless of subsection (7) of this
section, the owner or owners of ten percent or more of the nonfederal forest
land in the WAU may conduct a reanalysis at any time at their own expense and
the reanalysis may be conducted on areas smaller than the entire WAU.