Wash. Admin. Code § 296-900-17520 - Advisory committee
(1) The department
will create a SHIP advisory committee (SAC) that will be a subcommittee of the
WISHA advisory committee and will advise the department on program policy
issues and participate in the grant application review process. The SAC will
have eight to 10 members, including equal numbers of employer and employee
representatives, and others with relevant experience and expertise. Members
will be appointed to serve three-year renewable terms by the assistant director
of DOSH. The initial term for half of the first group of appointees will be 18
months. SAC membership will include:
(a) At
least one employer representative from the WISHA advisory committee or an
employer representative recommended by the WISHA advisory committee employer
representatives; and
(b) At least
one employee representative from the WISHA advisory committee or an employee
representative recommended by the WISHA advisory committee employee
representatives.
(2) The
SAC will be supplemented by ad hoc grant review committees consisting of
selected members of the SAC together with other individuals with experience and
expertise in the specific topic areas under review. Members of such ad hoc
grant review committees will be appointed by the assistant director for DOSH,
taking into consideration recommendations from the SAC and WISHA advisory
committee.
(3) All meetings of the
SAC will be convened and chaired by the assistant director for DOSH or
designee.
(4) The SAC will provide
the following assistance:
(a) Advice on SHIP
policy issues to DOSH and the WISHA advisory committee;
(b) Make recommendations to DOSH and the
WISHA advisory committee regarding funding priority areas;
(c) Review and comment on funding
recommendations made by grant review committees to the assistant director of
DOSH;
(d) Keep records of the SACs
decisions;
(e) Develop and maintain
communication networks in the community.
(5) SAC and grant review committee members
will disclose to the department any potential conflicts of interest with
specific project applications, whether direct or indirect. The department will
determine whether a member's connection to a project should result in recusal
from voting on the project. The department's decision and reasons supporting
the decision will be documented in the meeting minutes.
(6) SAC and grant review committee members
will not disclose any information about applications to anyone not authorized
access to the information by law or regulation.
Notes
Statutory Authority: RCW 49.17.010, 49.17.040, 49.17.050,
49.17.060, and
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.