Wis. Admin. Code Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System § UWS 7.05 - Expedited process
Current through March 28, 2022
(1) Whenever the chancellor of an institution
within the University of Wisconsin System receives a report under s.
UWS 7.04
or other credible information that a faculty member has pleaded guilty or no
contest to, or has been convicted of a felony of a type listed in s.
UWS 7.02(1)
(a), in state or federal court, the
chancellor shall:
(a) Within 3 working days of
receipt of the report or information, inform the faculty member of its receipt
and, after consulting with appropriate institutional governance
representatives, appoint an investigator to investigate the report or
information and to advise the chancellor as to whether to proceed under this
section or ch. UWS 4. If the university knows the identity of an affected
party, the university shall make a reasonable attempt to notify the affected
party of the report or information at the same time as the faculty
member.
(b) Upon appointing an
investigator and notifying the faculty member, afford the faculty member 3
working days in which to request that the investigator be disqualified on
grounds of lack of impartiality or other cause. In the event that the
chancellor determines that a request for disqualification should be granted,
the chancellor shall, within 2 working days of the determination, appoint a
different investigator. The faculty member shall have the opportunity to
request that any second or subsequent investigators be disqualified on grounds
of lack of impartiality or other cause.
(2) The investigator shall complete and file
a report with the chancellor not later than 10 working days following the
investigator's appointment.
(3)
Within 3 working days of receipt of the investigator's report, the chancellor
shall consult with appropriate institutional governance representatives and
decide whether to seek dismissal of the faculty member pursuant to this
chapter, to seek dismissal of the faculty member pursuant to ch. UWS 4, to seek
an alternative disciplinary sanction, or to discontinue the proceedings as
follows:
(a) If the chancellor decides to seek
dismissal of the faculty member pursuant to this chapter, the chancellor shall
file charges within 2 working days of reaching the decision.
(b) If the chancellor decides to seek
dismissal of the faculty member pursuant to ch. UWS 4, the chancellor shall
file charges and proceed in accordance with the provisions of that chapter and
implementing institutional policies. If, during the course of such proceedings
under ch. UWS 4, the chancellor receives a report under s.
UWS 7.04
or other credible information that the faculty member has pleaded guilty or no
contest to or has been convicted of a felony of a type listed in s.
UWS 7.02(1)
(a), and one or more of the conditions listed
in s.
UWS 7.02(1) (b)
through (e) are present, the chancellor may,
at that point, elect to follow the procedures for dismissal pursuant to this
chapter.
(c) If the chancellor
decides to seek an alternative disciplinary sanction, the procedures under chs.
UWS
4 and 6, and implementing institutional policies,
shall be followed.
(4) If
charges seeking dismissal are filed under sub. (3) (a), the faculty member
shall be afforded a hearing before the institutional standing committee charged
with hearing dismissal cases and making recommendations under s.
UWS
4.03. The hearing shall provide the procedural
guarantees enumerated under ss.
UWS 4.05 to
4.06, except that the hearing shall be concluded, and written findings and a
recommendation to the chancellor shall be prepared, within 15 working days of
the filing of charges.
(5) Within 3
working days of receipt of the findings and recommendation of the committee
under sub. (4), the chancellor shall prepare a written recommendation on the
matter as follows:
(a) If the recommendation
is for dismissal, the chancellor shall transmit it to the board for
review.
(b) Disciplinary action
other than dismissal may be taken by the chancellor, whose decision shall be
final, unless the board at its option grants a review on the record at the
request of the faculty member. The faculty member shall receive a copy of the
chancellor's final decision. If the identity of an affected party is known to
the university, the university shall make a reasonable attempt to provide the
affected party a copy of the chancellor's final decision at the same time as
the faculty member.
(6)
Upon receipt of the chancellor's recommendation, the full board shall review
the record before the institutional hearing committee and shall offer an
opportunity for filing exceptions to the recommendation, as well as for oral
argument. The full board shall issue its decision on the matter within 15
working days of receipt of the chancellor's recommendation. If the university
knows the identity of an affected party, the board shall make a reasonable
attempt to notify the affected party of its decision at the same time as the
faculty member.
(7) If a faculty
member whose dismissal is sought under sub. (3) (a) does not proceed with the
hearing before the institutional hearing committee as provided in sub. (4), the
board shall take appropriate action within 10 working days of receipt of the
statement of charges and the recommendation of the chancellor.
(8) The administration or its representatives
shall have the burden of proof to show that just cause exists for dismissal
under this chapter. The administration shall demonstrate by clear and
convincing evidence that the faculty member engaged in serious criminal
misconduct, as defined in s.
UWS
7.02.
(9)
The chair of the faculty hearing body, subject to the approval of the
chancellor, may extend the time limits set forth in this section if the parties
are unable to obtain, in a timely manner, relevant and material testimony,
physical evidence or records, or where due process otherwise
requires.
Notes
The following state regulations pages link to this page.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.