Wis. Admin. Code Public Service Commission PSC 4.10 - Categorizing commission actions
(1) TYPE I ACTIONS.
Type I actions are major actions that significantly affect the quality of the
human environment, within the meaning of s.
1.11(2) (c), Stats. The commission shall prepare an
EIS on any of the proposed actions involving a request for commission approval,
categorized as Type I actions, listed in Table 1. The commission shall also
prepare an EIS for actions not listed in Table 1 that it determines are Type I
actions.
(2) TYPE II ACTIONS. Type
II actions are proposed actions involving requests for commission approval that
have the potential to significantly affect the quality of the human
environment, within the meaning of s.
1.11(2) (c), Stats. Unless the commission decides an
EIS is necessary, the commission shall prepare an EA on any of the proposed
actions involving a request for commission approval, categorized as Type II
actions, listed in Table 2.
(3)
TYPE III ACTIONS. Type III actions are proposed actions involving requests for
commission approval that normally do not have the potential to significantly
affect the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of s.
1.11(2) (c), Stats. As such, they do not normally
require an EA or an EIS. An evaluation of a specific Type III proposal,
however, may indicate that the preparation of an EA or EIS is warranted for
that proposal. Type III actions are listed in Table 3.
(3m) ACTIONS NOT REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT.
(a) Commission actions not
specified under sub. (2) do not normally require an environmental assessment
except as otherwise determined by the commission under par. (b).
(b) Notwithstanding par. (a), the commission
shall prepare an EA on a proposed action if it finds that:
1. The action may be a major action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning
of s.
1.11(2) (c), Stats., and that an EIS may be required;
or
2. The action involves
unresolved conflicts concerning the use of available resources within the
meaning of s.
1.11(2) (e), Stats., such that the commission is
required to study, develop and describe alternatives to the proposed action,
and the commission has not studied, developed, and described alternatives in
writing by other means.
(4) CATEGORIZING TRANSMISSION LINES. If an
electric transmission line is designed with a combination of the structure
height and strength, line insulators, right-of-way and other elements that
would allow the line to be easily modified to operate at a higher voltage than
the initial operating voltage, the type of environmental review under this
section is based on the line's potential higher voltage level.
(5) REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS.
(a) If a reasonable alternative to any
proposed action specified in subs. (2) to (3m) exists, and the alternative
would require review under sub. (1) as a Type I action, the proposed action
shall be reviewed as a Type I action.
(b) Unless par. (a) applies, if a reasonable
alternative to any proposed action specified in subs. (3) to (3m) exists, and
the alternative would require review under sub. (2) as a Type II action, the
proposed action shall be reviewed under sub. (2) as a Type II action.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.